Literature DB >> 3474454

The National Bladder Cancer Study: employment in the chemical industry.

S H Zahm, P Hartge, R Hoover.   

Abstract

The relationship between bladder cancer employment in the chemical industry was assessed in a study of 2,982 incident cases and 5,782 population controls. There were 190 cases and 369 controls who had ever been employed in the chemical industry [odds ratio (OR) = 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.8, 1.2]. Employment in the production of organic chemicals was associated with a 1.3-fold increased risk among men (95% CI = 0.8, 2.1). Risk increased with duration of employment, reaching an OR of 2.4 for 20 or more years (chi for trend = 1.57; P = .06). Women who had worked in the plastics industry had a 3.3-fold increased bladder cancer risk. Within the plastics and rubber industry, increased risks for bladder cancer were found for men in mixing, filtering, grinding, and other dusty operations (OR = 4.6; 95% CI = 1.0, 20.4) and men in heat-associated operations (OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 0.5, 15.3). A 1.4-fold risk among men in agricultural chemicals was attributable to risks in the pesticides subdivision (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.6, 8.2). Men performing dusty operations (i.e., mixing, filtering, sifting, grinding, and crushing) in any industry had an OR of 1.4 (95% CI = 0.8, 2.7). Despite the large number of study subjects, few statistically significant findings were observed and should be evaluated with consideration of the large number of comparisons made in the analysis. The statistical power of case-control studies to detect risks associated with particular occupational exposures is limited by the small proportion of the population employed in any specific occupation or industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3474454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  7 in total

1.  Cancer mortality among chemical workers in an Italian plant.

Authors:  E Rapiti; F Fantini; V Dell'Orco; V Fano; F Blasetti; C Bracci; F Forastiere; P Comba
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Cancer risk in the rubber industry: a review of the recent epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  M Kogevinas; M Sala; P Boffetta; N Kazerouni; H Kromhout; S Hoar-Zahm
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Estimating cumulative spatial risk over time with low-rank kriging multiple membership models.

Authors:  Joseph Boyle; Mary H Ward; Stella Koutros; Margaret R Karagas; Molly Schwenn; Debra Silverman; David C Wheeler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Occupation and bladder cancer: a cohort study in Sweden.

Authors:  J Ji; C Granström; K Hemminki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Medical follow-up for workers exposed to bladder carcinogens: the French evidence-based and pragmatic statement.

Authors:  Bénédicte Clin; Jean-Claude Pairon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Pesticide exposure and risk of bladder cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Liang; Xiao Wang; Bo Xie; Yi Zhu; Jian Wu; Shiqi Li; Shuai Meng; Xiangyi Zheng; Alin Ji; Liping Xie
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

7.  Work-related bladder cancer risks in male Japanese workers: estimation of attributable fraction and geographical correlation analysis.

Authors:  N Yamaguchi; S Watanabe; T Okubo; K Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1991-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.