| Literature DB >> 34744493 |
Dong Li1,2, Zai Luo2, Bo Cao1.
Abstract
Blockchain technology is an undeniable ledger technology that stores transactions in high-security chains of blocks. Blockchain can solve security and privacy issues in a variety of domains. With the rapid development of smart environments and complicated contracts between users and intelligent devices, federated learning (FL) is a new paradigm to improve accuracy and precision factors of data mining by supporting information privacy and security. Much sensitive information such as patient health records, safety industrial information, and banking personal information in various domains of the Internet of Things (IoT) including smart city, smart healthcare, and smart industry should be collected and gathered to train and test with high potential privacy and secured manner. Using blockchain technology to the adaption of intelligent learning can influence maintaining and sustaining information security and privacy. Finally, blockchain-based FL mechanisms are very hot topics and cut of scientific edge in data science and artificial intelligence. This research proposes a systematic study on the discussion of privacy and security in the field of blockchain-based FL methodologies on the scientific databases to provide an objective road map of the status of this issue. According to the analytical results of this research, blockchain-based FL has been grown significantly during these 5 years and blockchain technology has been used more to solve problems related to patient healthcare records, image retrieval, cancer datasets, industrial equipment, and economical information in the field of IoT applications and smart environments.Entities:
Keywords: Blockchain; Federated learning; Internet of Things (IoT); Privacy; Security
Year: 2021 PMID: 34744493 PMCID: PMC8561346 DOI: 10.1007/s10586-021-03424-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cluster Comput ISSN: 1386-7857 Impact factor: 2.303
Fig. 1Paper selection strategy
Statistical view of search-based finding report for blockchain and federated learning strategies
| Keywords | Number of studies before applying inclusion and exclusion method | Total number of selected papers |
|---|---|---|
| “Blockchain” | 2435 | 287 |
| “Federated learning” | 1633 | 154 |
| “Blockchain” + “Federated learning” | 1226 | 41 |
Fig. 2Comprehensive taxonomy on blockchain-based FL mechanisms
Fig. 3Variety of blockchain technologies for existing federated learning techniques
Fig. 4Statistical view on blockchain technologies in federated learning concept
Fig. 5Percentage of the federated learning environments for blockchain technologies
List of applied federated learning algorithms with full name
| Abbreviation | Full name |
|---|---|
| CFL | Chain Federated learning |
| FGFL | Fine-Grained Federated Learning |
| AFL | Auditable Federated Learning |
| CEFL | Communication-Efficient Federated Learning |
| RFL | Reward Federated Learning |
| RFL | Reputation-Aware Federated Learning |
| RAFL | Reliability-aware Federated Learning |
| IFL | Incentive-aware Federated Learning |
Fig. 6Comparison of federated learning implementations with blockchain technology
List of most highly cited researchers in federated learning and blockchain technologies
| Cited by | Researcher |
|---|---|
| 70,242 | Qiang Yang |
| 29,942 | Bhaskar Krishnamachari |
| 26,062 | Yaochu Jin |
| 20,242 | Mary Lacity |
| 17,074 | Jin Li |
| 9344 | Hasnaine Siddique |
| 8281 | Dongning Guo |
| 6565 | Rong Yu |
| 6481 | Yaser Jararweh |
| 5784 | Behrad Bagheri |
Fig. 7Variety of evaluated QoS factors in blockchain-based federated learning techniques
Fig. 8Variety of technical keywords in blockchain-based federated learning case studies