Literature DB >> 34744330

Evolution of Bilateral Mammary Arterial Grafting Program in Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Sue X Wang1, Michelle Lee1, Chih-Chiun Chang1, Lillian Y Y Lai1, Nick Flores1, Liang Ge1, Curtis J Wozniak1, Elaine E Tseng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization with bilateral internal mammary arteries is associated with increased long-term survival, but underutilized due to sternal wound infection concerns. Dedicated bilateral mammary grafting programs are typically high-volume academic or private practices, rather than lower-volume federal institutions whose results are not captured in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Our institution used only single internal mammary arterial grafting in the year prior to implementing a dedicated bilateral grafting program using skeletonized technique. We describe our experience transitioning to bilateral mammary grafting and its impact on sternal wound infection.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 200 patients undergoing first-time isolated, multi-vessel coronary artery bypass from August 2014 to October 2017. Sternal wound infection was defined broadly to include any patient receiving antibiotics for suspicion of sternal infection. Patients were followed for wound complications until 3 post-operative months.
RESULTS: Of 200 total patients, 45.5% (n=91) were diabetic, 44% (n=88) had BMI >30, and 61.5% (n=123) underwent bilateral mammary grafting. Bilateral mammary grafting population had 2.4% (n=3/123) deep sternal wound infection with 1.6% (n=2/123) requiring sternal reconstruction while single mammary population had 1.3% (n=1/77, p=1.0). Bilateral mammary grafting population had 6.5% (n=8/123) superficial sternal wound infection compared to 5.2% (n=4/77, p=0.77) in single mammary grafting population.
CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning to high rates of bilateral mammary utilization was possible in a year with low rates of complications. Based on our experience, surgeons should consider adopting a skeletonized bilateral mammary grafting approach given potential long-term survival benefit.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 34744330      PMCID: PMC8568483     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  22 in total

1.  Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART).

Authors:  David P Taggart; Douglas G Altman; Alastair M Gray; Belinda Lees; Fiona Nugara; Ly-Mee Yu; Helen Campbell; Marcus Flather
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Skeletonized versus pedicled bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: outcomes and concerns analyzed through a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Paulo Ernando Ferraz Cavalcanti; Henrique José de Andrade Costa Santos; Artur Freire Soares; Rodrigo Gusmão Albuquerque Miranda; Mayara Lopes Araújo; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Current Practice of State-of-the-Art Surgical Coronary Revascularization.

Authors:  Stuart J Head; Milan Milojevic; David P Taggart; John D Puskas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries.

Authors:  D P Taggart; R D'Amico; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Gabriel S Aldea; Faisal G Bakaeen; Jay Pal; Stephen Fremes; Stuart J Head; Joseph Sabik; Todd Rosengart; A Pieter Kappetein; Vinod H Thourani; Scott Firestone; John D Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves sternal perfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison.

Authors:  Munir Boodhwani; B Khanh Lam; Howard J Nathan; Thierry G Mesana; Marc Ruel; Wanzhen Zeng; Frank W Sellke; Fraser D Rubens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Changes over time in risk profiles of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP).

Authors:  Lorraine D Cornwell; Shuab Omer; Todd Rosengart; William L Holman; Faisal G Bakaeen
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in diabetic patients: short-term and long-term results of a 515-patient series.

Authors:  Oren Lev-Ran; Rephael Mohr; Dmitri Pevni; Nahum Nesher; Yona Weissman; Dan Loberman; Gideon Uretzky
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Total Arterial Revascularization: A Superior Strategy for Diabetic Patients Who Require Coronary Surgery.

Authors:  James Tatoulis; Rochelle Wynne; Peter D Skillington; Brian F Buxton
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  National Trends and Geographic Variation in Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Philip P Goodney; Alyssa M Flores; Joseph DeSimone; Anthony W DiScipio; Andrea Austin; Jock N McCullough
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.