Literature DB >> 34743959

Sonodynamic therapy: Ultrasound parameters and in vitro experimental configurations.

Yugo Araújo Martins1, Theo Zeferino Pavan2, Renata Fonseca Vianna Lopez3.   

Abstract

Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a new therapeutic modality for noninvasive cancer treatment based on the association of ultrasound and sonosensitizer drugs. Up to date, there is not a consensus on the standardization of the experimental conditions for the in vitro studies to correctly assess cell viability during SDT. Therefore, this review article mainly describes how the main ultrasound parameters and experimental setups of ultrasound application in vitro studies can influence the SDT bioeffects/response. The sonodynamic action is impacted by the combination of frequency, intensity, duty cycle, and ultrasound application time. The variation of experimental setups in cell culture, such as the transducer position, cell-transducer distance, coupling medium thickness, or type of culture, also influences the sonodynamic response. The intensity, duty cycle, and sonication duration increase cytotoxicity and reactive oxygen species production. For similar ultrasound parameters, differences in the experimental configuration impact cell death in vitro. Four main experimental setups are used to assess for SDT in cell culture (i) a planar transducer placed directly in contact with the bottom of the culture microplate; (ii) microplate positioned in the transducer's far-field using a water tank; (iii) sealed cell culture tubes immersed in water away from the transducer; and (iv) transducer dipped directly into the well with cell culture. Because of the significant variations in the experimental setups, sonodynamic response can significantly vary, and the translation of these results for in vivo experimentation is difficult. Therefore, a well-designed and detailed in vitro experimental setup is vital for understanding the interactions among the biological medium, the sonosensitizer, and the ultrasound for the in vitro to in vivo translation in SDT.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological response; Cancer treatment; Cell culture; Nanoparticles; Sensitizer; Therapeutic ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34743959     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  2 in total

1.  Microbubbles Ultrasonic Cavitation Regulates Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Enhances Sonodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Fen Xi; Yuyi Feng; Qiaoli Chen; Liping Chen; Jianhua Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Emerging photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies for urological cancers: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Yu-Sen Zhang; Yi-Chao Liu; Na Wang; Xian-Tao Zeng; Ling-Ling Zhang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 9.429

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.