Efmoroctocog Alfa: A Review in Haemophilia A.

Efmoroctocog alfa (Elocta®, Eloctate®, Eloctate™), an extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII)-Fc fusion protein, is approved for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A. The efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa in the prevention and treatment of bleeding in previously treated patients (PTPs) and previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A has been demonstrated in phase III studies; this includes its use in the perioperative setting (in PTPs). Furthermore, the effectiveness of efmoroctocog alfa in clinical practice has been confirmed in numerous real-world studies; compared with conventional, standard half-life (SHL) FVIII products, prophylaxis with this EHL FVIII product achieved similar or reduced bleeding rates with fewer injections. Efmoroctocog alfa was generally well tolerated; inhibitors occurred in approximately one-third of PUPs in a phase III study. Efmoroctocog alfa is an established and effective EHL FVIII replacement therapy for the management of haemophilia A. Compared with SHL FVIII products, EHL FVIII products such as efmoroctocog alfa have the potential to optimise prophylactic outcomes by decreasing the burden of treatment or increasing the level of bleed protection.

Efmoroctocog Alfa: Clinical Considerations in Haemophilia A

Introduction

Coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy via intravenous (IV) administration of plasma-derived FVIII or recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates is still the mainstay of treatment for haemophilia A [1-3]. For individuals with severe disease [endogenous FVIII activity < 1 IU/kg (< 1 % of normal; ≈ 50–60% of patients)], optimal treatment would include prophylactic therapy aimed at preventing bleeding, particularly haemarthroses; prophylaxis initiated in early childhood is effective in preserving joint health [1, 2, 4]. Prophylaxis also reduces the formation of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (inhibitors), which is the most serious complication of haemophilia treatment [5].

Traditional FVIII products (including conventional rFVIII preparations) have relatively short half-lives (≈ 10–14 h) that necessitate frequent injections (typically three or more times a week) to maintain protective FVIII levels (> 1 IU/kg). Thus, rFVIII preparations with extended half-lives have been developed, which have the potential to optimise prophylactic outcomes by (i) decreasing the burden of treatment through a reduction in injection frequency [which may promote adherence and improve patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL)] or (ii) increasing the FVIII trough level (and hence the amount of bleed protection) without reducing injection frequency [1-4].

Efmoroctocog alfa (Elocta®, Eloctate®, Eloctate™), a first-in-class rFVIII-Fc fusion protein consisting of a single molecule of recombinant B-domain deleted human FVIII covalently linked to the dimeric Fc domain of human immunoglobulin G1, is one such extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII preparation [2, 5]. It is approved for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A in various countries worldwide, including those of the EU [6], as well as the USA [7] and Japan [8]. This article discusses clinical trial and real-world data on the use of efmoroctocog alfa in the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A.

Pharmacological Properties

The pharmacological properties of efmoroctocog alfa, including preclinical studies evaluating the immunomodulatory properties of this and other Fc fusion proteins in models of haemophilia A, have been reviewed in detail elsewhere [2, 9].

Key pharmacokinetic parameters for efmoroctocog alfa are summarized in Table 1. The pharmacokinetics of this EHL rFVIII product are age-dependent, with clearance decreasing and, therefore, the terminal elimination half-life (t½) increasing, with increasing age [2] (Table 1). The t½ of efmoroctocog alfa is ≈ 1.4−1.8 times longer than that of conventional FVIII/rFVIII preparations as a result of the Fc portion binding to the neonatal Fc receptor, which is part of a naturally occurring pathway that protects immunoglobulins (and Fc fusion proteins) from lysosomal degradation by recycling them back into the circulation [2, 5, 10].

Table 1

Pharmacokinetic parameters of efmoroctocog alfa: results by age group in previously treated males with severe haemophilia A who received a single intravenous dose (50 IU/kg) in phase III studies [6]

Parameter (geometric mean)	Kids A-LONG				A-LONG
	< 6 years		6–11 years		12–17 years		≥ 15 years
	OSCA (n = 23)	CA (n = 24)	OSCA (n = 31)	CA (n = 27)	OSCA (n = 11)	CA (n = 11)	OSCA (n = 28)	CA (n = 27)
IR (IU/dL per IU/kg)	1.90	1.88	2.30	2.08	1.81	1.91	2.24	2.49
AUC/dose (IU·h/dL per IU/kg)	28.9	25.9	38.4	32.8	38.2	40.8	51.2	47.5
CL (mL/h/kg)	3.46	3.86	2.61	3.05	2.62	2.45	1.95	2.11
t½ (h)	12.3	14.3	13.5	15.9	16.0	17.5	19.0	20.9
MRT (h)	16.8	17.2	19.0	20.7	22.7	23.5	25.2	25.0
Vss (mL/kg)	57.9	66.5	49.5	63.1	59.4	57.6	49.1	52.6

AUC area under the factor VIII activity-time curve, CA chromogenic assay, CL clearance, IR incremental recovery, IU international unit, MRT mean residence time, OSCA one-stage clotting assay, t terminal elimination half-life, V volume of distribution at steady state

Therapeutic Efficacy of Efmoroctocog Alfa

Previously Treated Patients

The efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa in the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A has been demonstrated in two open-label, noncomparative, multinational, phase III trials (A-LONG [11] and Kids A-LONG [12]) and confirmed in a long-term extension study (ASPIRE) [13].

Previously treated adult and adolescent males aged ≥ 12 years with < 1 % endogenous FVIII activity (or severe genotype) were eligible to enter A-LONG if (i) they were being treated prophylactically or (ii) they were being treated episodically and had a history of ≥ 12 bleeding events in the 12 months prior to the study. This partially randomized trial had three arms: individualized prophylaxis (IP) [25 IU/kg on day 1 and 50 IU/kg on day 4 to start; thereafter, dose (25–65 IU/kg) and dosing interval (every 3–5 days) adjusted as needed]; weekly prophylaxis (WP) [65 IU/kg]; and episodic treatment (ET) [10–50 IU/kg, depending on bleeding severity] [11]. Co-primary efficacy endpoints included the overall per-patient annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in the IP arm versus the ET arm and basic pharmacokinetic parameters for efmoroctocog alfa [11] (Table 2).

Table 2

Efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa in the prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in phase III studies of previously treated males with severe haemophilia A

Outcome	A-LONG (pts ≥ 12 y) [2, 6, 11]			Kids A-LONGa (pts < 12 y) [2, 7, 12]
	IP (n = 117)	WP (n = 23)	ET (n = 23)	All pts (n = 69)	< 6 y (n = 35)	6–11 y (n = 34)
Median treatment duration (wks)	32.1	28.0	28.9	26.3	NR/NA	NR/NA
Median ABR
Overall	1.6	3.6	33.6	2.0	0.0	2.0
Spontaneous	0.0	1.9	20.2	0.0	0.0	0.0
Traumatic	0.0	1.7	9.3	0.0	0.0	0.0
Joint	0.0	1.9	22.8	0.0	0.0	0.0
Spontaneous	0.0	0.0	18.6	0.0	0.0	0.0
Traumatic	0.0	0.0	3.9	NR/NA	NR/NA	NR/NA
Pts with 0 bleeds (%)	45.3	17.4	0	46.4	51.4	41.2
Median dosing interval (d)	3.5	7	NR/NA	3.5	3.5	3.5
Median CFC/wk (IU/kg)	77.9	65.6	NR/NA	88.1	91.6	86.9
Median CFC/y (IU/kg)	4212	3805	1039	NR/NA	5146	4700

ABR annualized bleeding rate, CFC clotting factor consumption, d days, ET episodic (on-demand) treatment, IP individualized prophylaxis, IU international unit, NR/NA not reported or not available/applicable, pts patients, wk(s) week(s), WP weekly prophylaxis, y year

aAll pts received IP with efmoroctocog alfa

Children aged < 12 years with < 1 % endogenous FVIII activity (or severe genotype) were eligible to enter Kids A-LONG if they had been treated with any FVIII product for ≥ 50 exposure days (EDs) [12]. All 69 evaluable patients (35 aged < 6 years; 34 aged 6–11 years) in this single-arm, non-randomized study received IP [a twice-weekly regimen of 25 IU/kg on day 1 and 50 IU/kg on day 4 to start; thereafter, dose (≤ 80 IU/kg) and dosing interval (≥ 2 days) were adjusted as needed]. The sole primary endpoint was the development of inhibitors detected at ≥ 0.6 Bethesda units (BU)/mL [12] (Sect. 4).

Patients who completed A-LONG or Kids A-LONG could enrol in ASPIRE [13]. This non-randomized, open-label, multinational, phase III trial had four treatment groups: (1) IP [25–65 IU/kg every 3–5 days or twice-weekly dosing with 25–65 IU/kg on day 1 and 40–65 IU/kg on day 4 (doses ≤ 80 IU/kg with dosing intervals ≥ 2 days in patients aged < 12 years)], (2) WP (65 IU/kg), (3) modified prophylaxis (MP) [personalized dosing for patients in whom optimal prophylaxis could not be achieved with either IP or WP, e.g. less frequent dosing or targeting a FVIII trough level of > 3 %] and (4) ET (dosing based on type and severity of bleeding). Patients could change from one treatment group to another at enrolment (and at any time during the trial), except those aged < 12 years at enrolment who could only participate in the IP and MP groups until the age of 12. The primary endpoint was the development of inhibitors (Sect. 4); secondary endpoints included bleed control (e.g. ABRs and resolution of acute bleeding episodes) [13].

Prophylaxis

Long-term prophylactic treatment with efmoroctocog alfa (administered once- or twice-weekly in adults/adolescents; twice-weekly in children) was effective in preventing bleeding episodes in male PTPs with severe haemophilia, including those with pre-existing target joints (Tables 2, 3).

Table 3

Efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa in the long-term prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in the phase III ASPIRE study in previously treated males with severe haemophilia A: results by core study and treatment regimen [6, 13]

Outcome	A-LONG [pts ≥ 12 y] (n = 150)a				Kids A-LONG [pts < 12 y] (n = 61)a,b
	IP (n = 110)	WP (n = 27)	MP (n = 21)c	ET (n = 13)	IP [< 6 y] (n = 29)	IP [6–11 y] (n = 30)
Median ABR
Overall	0.7	2.2	4.1	19.1	1.2	1.6
In pts with ≥ 1 target jointd	0.7	2.2	5.0	16.1	5.0	0.8
Spontaneous	0.1	1.5	1.4	14.6	0.6	0.3
Traumatic	0.2	0.5	0.9	1.4	0.4	1.0
Joint	0.5	1.7	1.7	13.1	0.6	0.7
Spontaneous joint	0.0	1.0	1.0	9.2	0.0	0.0
Median dosing interval (d)	3.5	7.0	5.0	NR/NA	3.5	3.5
Median CFC/wk (IU/kg)	79.5	65.7	70.6	NR/NA	101.9	94.9
Median CFC/y (IU/kg)	4223	3510	NR/NA	671e	5418	4990

ABR annualized bleeding rate, CFC clotting factor consumption, d days, ET episodic treatment, IP individualized prophylaxis, IU international unit, MP modified prophylaxis, pts patients, wk week, WP weekly prophylaxis, y year, NR/NA not reported or not available/applicable

aMedian treatment duration: 4.5 y in A-LONG/ASPIRE (3.9 y in ASPIRE only) and 3.5 y in Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE (3.2 y in ASPIRE only)

bThree pts received MP, including one in the < 6 y age cohort initially assigned to IP who subsequently switched to MP (data not shown)

c21 pts who were initially assigned to IP, WP or ET subsequently switched to MP

dIn A-LONG, n = 72, 16, 16 and 11 for IP, WP, MP and ET, respectively. In Kids A-LONG, n = 2 and 5 for the < 6 y and 6–11 y age cohorts

eIn six pts who received ET for ≥ 1 year in ASPIRE

The annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in A-LONG (primary objective) was significantly reduced by 92% with IP versus ET (2.9 vs. 37.3; p < 0.001) and by 76% with efmoroctocog alfa as WP versus ET (8.9 vs. 37.3; p < 0.001). Reductions in ABRs with both IP and WP relative to ET were consistent across all prespecified subgroups [11].

The overall median ABR in the efmoroctocog alfa IP arm in A-LONG was 1.6 (Table 2); the last 6 months on-study median ABR in 23 patients with ≥ 9 months on study was zero [14]. The median dosing interval was 3.5 days (Table 2). Of note, patients transitioning from pre-study prophylaxis with conventional FVIII to efmoroctocog alfa IP experienced reductions in both ABR and injection frequency [15]. Thus, the overall and last 3 months on-study median ABRs (2.1 and 0.0, respectively) were significantly (p < 0.001) lower than the pre-study median ABR in patients previously on prophylactic therapy who received efmoroctocog alfa IP for ≥ 6 months (n = 80). All but one of these patients decreased their injection frequency compared with their pre-study regimen, albeit their median weekly FVIII consumption remained consistent [15].

Similar to the efmoroctocog alfa IP arm of A-LONG, the median overall ABR in Kids A-LONG was 2.0 (Table 2); the last 3 months on-study median ABRs in 26 patients aged < 6 years and 33 patients aged 6–11 years with ≥ 24 weeks on study were zero and zero, respectively [12]. The median dosing interval was 3.5 days (in both age cohorts) (Table 2). Patients who had previously received FVIII prophylaxis showed a lowering of their overall median ABR [pre- vs on-study: 1.5 vs 0.0 in the < 6 year cohort (n = 32); 2.5 vs 2.0 in the 6–11 year cohort (n = 30)]. Moreover, 74% reduced their injection frequency compared with their pre-study regimen; their median weekly FVIII consumption was also lower (pre- vs on-study: 97.8 vs 90.6 and 102.5 vs 87.7 IU/kg in the < 6 and 6–11 year cohorts, respectively) [12].

A-LONG participants receiving efmoroctocog alfa IP reported clinically meaningful improvements in HRQOL, as assessed using the Haemophilia‐specific Quality of Life (Haem‐A‐QoL) questionnaire, an instrument which has been designed and validated for use in adults (i.e. ≥ 17 years of age) with haemophilia [16]. At 6 months, improvements from baseline in the Haem‐A‐QoL ‘total score’ and the ‘physical health’ domain score were significant (p ≤ 0.034) in evaluable patients who received IP. Improvements in HRQOL were more marked and responder rates were higher in patients who received pre-study ET with FVIII than those who received pre-study prophylactic treatment with FVIII [16].

A-LONG participants receiving efmoroctocog alfa IP also experienced some significant improvements in pain-related QOL over time (post hoc data) [17]. As assessed using the Haem-A-QoL ‘physical health’ domain, the proportions of evaluable patients who reported that they never/rarely experienced painful swellings (66% vs 46%; p = 0.001) and never/rarely experienced pain in their joints (42% vs 27%; p = 0.012) were greater at the end of the study than at baseline. In addition, as assessed using the ‘pain/discomfort’ domain of the 3-level version of the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-3L) instrument], the proportion of evaluable patients who reported no pain/discomfort was greater at the end of the study than at baseline (45% vs 34%; p < 0.05). Mean changes from baseline in EQ-5D-3L index and visual analogue scale scores were significant (p < 0.05) at the end of the study [17].

Of note, the majority of patients treated with efmoroctocog alfa in A-LONG or Kids A-LONG (86% and 87%, respectively) reported maintained or increased physical activity levels during the period of assessment (weeks 7−52 and 2−26, respectively) [18]. Similar results were seen in patients with and without target joint(s) at baseline [18].

The low ABRs and extended dosing intervals achieved in A-LONG and Kids A-LONG were maintained in the majority of patients who received efmoroctocog alfa IP in the 4-year ASPIRE extension study [13] (Table 3). Among adults and adolescents enrolled from A-LONG, ABRs were lower in those receiving IP compared with WP and MP; ABRs in all three prophylaxis groups were lower than those in the ET group (Table 3). Compared with A-LONG, the dosing interval lengthened for 21% of adults and adolescents over the course of ASPIRE (23% lengthened their dosing interval to > 5 days); it shortened for 8% of patients. Median weekly FVIII consumption at the end of ASPIRE was the same as that at the end of A-LONG (75 IU/kg vs 75 IU/kg; n = 128) [13]. Compared with Kids A-LONG, the dosing interval lengthened for 7% of children during ASPIRE [3% (all aged > 6 years) lengthened their dosing interval to > 5 days]; it shortened for 5% of patients. In contrast to adults and adolescents, median weekly FVIII consumption in children was higher at the end of ASPIRE than at the end of Kids A-LONG (95 IU/kg vs 75 IU/kg; n = 61). Of note, > 99% of the 1680 physician global assessments of response to prophylactic treatment were graded ‘excellent’ (87%) or ‘effective’ (13%) [13].

In the final longitudinal analysis of patients treated prophylactically in the core and ASPIRE studies, the median cumulative treatment duration was 4.2 years in evaluable adults and adolescents from A-LONG and 3.4 years in evaluable children from Kids A-LONG (post hoc data) [19]. The median overall ABRs at years 1 and 5 were 1.2 (n = 122) and 0.5 (n = 46), respectively, in A-LONG/ASPIRE participants receiving efmoroctocog alfa IP, and 2.0 (n = 38) and 1.7 (n = 13) among those receiving efmoroctocog alfa WP. The median overall ABRs at years 1 and 4 were 1.8 (n = 61) and 1.3 (n = 31), respectively, in Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE participants who received efmoroctocog alfa IP [19].

Patients with pre-existing target joints treated prophylactically with efmoroctocog alfa in Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE and A-LONG/ASPIRE sustained low target joint and spontaneous target joint ABRs (in addition to low overall ABRs) and, in almost all cases, achieved target joint resolution (i.e. ≤ 2 spontaneous bleeds in the joint in a 12-month period) [post hoc data] [20]. According to the final longitudinal analysis [20], the median spontaneous target joint ABR was zero in patients with pre-existing target joint(s) at entry into Kids A-LONG (n = 13) and A-LONG (n = 82) who received IP. Overall, 100% and 99.6% of target joints resolved in Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE (n = 9 evaluable) and A-LONG/ASPIRE (n = 235), respectively; of those target joints with ≥ 6 months of follow-up post-resolution, 100% and 95% showed no target joint reoccurrence, respectively [20].

Importantly, improvements in joint health have been observed over time in patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis in Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE and A-LONG/ASPIRE, as assessed using the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and modified HJHS (mHJHS), respectively (post hoc data) [20-22]. For example, significant improvements in HJHS (p < 0.05 vs Kids A-LONG baseline; n = 24 evaluable patients) [22] and mHJHS (p = 0.001 vs A-LONG baseline; n = 47) [21] were seen at ASPIRE year 2. There were improvements regardless of whether or not patients had target joints at Kids A-LONG/A-LONG baseline (present vs absent) and irrespective of the pre-study FVIII treatment regimen (prophylactic vs episodic) [21], although the data reported indicate that the benefits are greater in patients with pre-existing target joints and those on pre-study ET [21, 22]. In the final longitudinal analysis of Kids A-LONG/A-LONG and ASPIRE [20], the mean change in HJHS from Kids A-LONG baseline (1.5) to the end of ASPIRE was −1.0 (n = 42 evaluable patients; median of 3.69 years of follow-up); the mean change in mHJHS from A-LONG baseline (21.6) to the end of ASPIRE was −3.5 (n = 78; 3.72 years).

Regarding longer-term HRQOL, there were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQOL from Kids A-LONG baseline to ASPIRE year 2, as measured using the child- and parent-reported Canadian Hemophilia Outcomes–Kids Life Assessment Tool (n = 16 evaluable patients) [22].

Treatment of Acute Bleeding Episodes

Efmoroctocog alfa was effective in controlling acute bleeding in the A-LONG, Kids A-LONG and ASPIRE studies [6, 7, 11–13, 23]. The majority of acute bleeds were controlled with one (87%, 81% and ≥ 76% of episodes in A-LONG [7, 11, 23], Kids A-LONG [7, 12] and ASPIRE [13], respectively) or up to two (98% [7, 11, 23], 93% [7, 12] and ≥ 93% [13], respectively) injections of efmoroctocog alfa; the median dose per injection to treat a bleeding episode was 27.4 [11], 49.7 [12] and ≥ 26.4 [13] IU/kg, respectively. The majority of responses to first injections were rated by patients as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ (78% [7, 11, 23], 93% [7] and ≥ 73% [13], respectively).

Perioperative Management

Efmoroctocog alfa effectively provided perioperative haemostatic control across a wide spectrum of major and minor surgeries in A-LONG, Kids A-LONG and ASPIRE [13, 24, 25] (post hoc data [25]). In total, 46 major and 90 minor surgeries were performed on 32 and 70 patients, based on the final pooled analysis of these three studies [25]. Patients undergoing surgery received an investigator-determined efmoroctocog alfa regimen; it was administered on the day of surgery for 44 major (including 33 orthopaedic and 2 spinal surgeries) and 84 minor procedures. During most major (87%) and minor (89%) surgeries, haemostasis was maintained with ≤ 1 efmoroctocog alfa injection administered on the day of surgery or the day prior to surgery (i.e. loading dose). In addition, all major and minor surgeries evaluated for haemodynamic response were rated by investigators/surgeons as being ‘excellent’ [i.e. intraoperative and postoperative blood loss similar to, or less than, that for a non-haemophilic patient: 93% and 85% of major and minor surgeries, respectively] or good (i.e. blood loss increased, but not to a clinically significant extent, over expectations for a non-haemophilic patient). The median total dose of efmoroctocog alfa to maintain haemostasis was 61 and 62 IU/kg during major and minor surgeries, respectively. Blood products were transfused for 4 major surgeries: bilateral knee arthroplasty, above-the-knee amputation, unilateral knee arthroplasty and unilateral hip arthroplasty [25].

Real-World Experience

The effectiveness of prophylactic treatment with efmoroctocog alfa in PTPs of all ages with haemophilia A in clinical practice is being evaluated in three ongoing, prospective, observational, phase IV studies being conducted at multiple centres across Germany (PREVENT [26, 27]), Europe (A-SURE [28, 29]; see Sect. 6), and Europe and the Middle East (A-MORE [30]; see Sect. 6).

The first interim analyses of patients observed for ≥ 9 months in the 24-month, noncomparative PREVENT study showed that efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis maintained good protection from bleeds with a low injection frequency [26, 27]. For all 67 evaluable patients (mean age 26.2 years; 96% with severe disease), the median overall ABR was 0.9; the median weekly efmoroctocog alfa injection frequency and dose were 2.2 and 84.6 IU/kg [26]. For the 55 evaluable paediatric patients aged < 18 years (median age 8.0 years; 89% with severe disease), the median overall ABR was 0.6; the median weekly efmoroctocog alfa injection frequency and dose were 2.3 and 102 IU/kg [27].

A large number of retrospective real-world studies [31-52] have confirmed the efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa in the prophylaxis of bleeding observed in phase III clinical trials. The following discussion, however, only focuses on those involving > 30 PTPs from one or more European countries [31, 36–44, 47–49] or the USA [50-52].

In before-after (within-patient) studies, transitioning to prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa from that with conventional FVIII products [including standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII preparations] was associated with maintained or lowered ABRs, while FVIII injection frequency and FVIII consumption were decreased (Table 4). Across the studies, changes in mean or median ABRs or bleed rates ranged from zero (i.e. no change) up to reductions of four (p ≤ 0.003 vs previous prophylaxis [40, 41, 47, 49]); these were accompanied by reductions in the median number of weekly or yearly injections ranging from 22 to 33% (p < 0.001 vs previous prophylaxis [40, 41, 44, 48, 50]) and reductions in weekly, monthly or yearly FVIII consumption typically ranging from 10 to 40% (p ≤ 0.028 vs previous prophylaxis [31, 40, 44, 49, 50]) (Table 4).

Table 4

Real-world effectiveness of switching to prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa from conventional FVIII products in patients with haemophilia A: results of before-after (within-patient) studies from Europe and the USA

Study (no. of pts)	Country	Outcome post-switch [pre-switch value]
		ABRa	IFa	CFCa
Benitez et al. [31] (40)	Spain	↓51%**b ↓55%**b,c		IU/pt/mo: ↓40%*b,c
Carcao et al. [50] (38)	USA	1 (0d) [1.2 (0d)]	/wk: 2.3*** [3.5]	IU/kg/wk: 85.5** [103]
Giraud et al. [41] (34)	France	All pts: 1*** [5] pts < 12 y: 3* [7.5] pts 12−18 y: 2* [6] pts > 18 y: 0** [1]	/y: 105*** [139] /y: ↓21%*b /y: ↓28%**b /y: ↓18%**b	IU/pt/y: ↓2%b IU/pt/y: ↑6%b IU/pt/y: ↓9%b IU/pt/y: ↑2%b
Holmström et al. [37] (83e)	Sweden	0 [0]	/wk: 2.8 [3.8]	IU/kg/wk: 79.0 [87.9]
Horvais et al. [48, 49] (85f)	France	4** [6.6]	/wk: 2*** [3]	IU/pt/y: ↓40*%b
Katsarou et al. [47] (42)	Greece	1.5** [3.1]
Morais et al. [39] (35)	Portugal	0g (0d,g) [2g (1d,g)]		IU/pt:↓18.7%b,f
Myren et al. [43] (87)	France, Germany, Italy, UK		/wk: 2.1 [3]	IU/pt/y: ↓27%b
Simon et al. [44] (34)	Italy	0.13 [0.63]	/y: 122*** [156]	IU/pt/y: ↓28%***b
van der Sluijs et al. [42] (113)	France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK	1 [3]	/wk: 2 [3]	IU/kg/wk: 86 [103.3]
Wall et al. [40] (158)	UK	2** (1**d ) [2.6 (1d)]	/wk: 2.3** [3.2]	IU/kg/wk: 68** [81]

(A)BR (annualized) BR, (A)JBR (annualized) joint BR, BR bleeding rate, CFC clotting factor consumption, IF injection frequency, IU international unit, mo month, pt(s) patient(s), wk week, y year, ↑ increased, ↓ decreased

*p ≤ 0.043, **p ≤ 0.004, ***p ≤ 0.0007 vs pre-switch

aMean (ABR [31, 44, 47–49], IF [37, 43], CFC [37, 39, 42, 43]) or median (ABR [37, 40–42, 50], BR [39], JBR [39], AJBR [40, 50], IF [40–42, 44, 50], CFC [40, 41, 44, 50]) value, where known

bvs pre-switch value

cAnalysis includes an additional 11 pts who received on-demand efmoroctocog alfa

dJBR [39] or AJBR [40, 50]

en = 62 for ABR

fn = 25 for ABR and CFC

gOver a mean period of 10.6 mo [39]

Across comparative studies, ABRs with efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis were comparable to, or lower than, those with SHL FVIII products, and higher proportions of efmoroctocog alfa recipients experienced zero bleeds (Table 5). FVIII injection frequency was also numerically reduced with efmoroctocog alfa relative to SHL FVIII products (Table 5). Bleeding outcomes and dosing data for efmoroctocog alfa were generally similar to those for the other EHL rFVIII products included in these studies (Table 5). In the MOTHIF-II study [48, 49], the mean ABR decreased significantly in patients with severe disease who switched from conventional FVIII prophylaxis to efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis (n = 25; Table 4), but remained stable in those who, instead of switching, continued to receive conventional FVIII prophylaxis (n = 49). FVIII consumption decreased significantly in patients who switched to efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis (Table 4), but increased by ≈ 10% in those remaining on conventional FVIII prophylaxis [49].

Table 5

Real-world effectiveness of prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa versus other recombinant FVIII products in patients with haemophilia A: results of multicentre, retrospective, chart-review studies from Europe and the USA

Study (Country)	Comparators (no. of pts)	ABRa	0 bleeds (% pts)	IF/wk (≤ 2 vs ≥ 3; % pts)	CFC (IU/kg/wk)a
Mancuso et al. [38] (Italy)	Efmoroctocog alfa (73)	0.0	NR	76.7 vs 23.3	92.3
	Lonoctocog alfa (60)	0.0	NR	56.7 vs 43.3	91.6
	Octocog alfa (Advate®) (83)	1.0	NR	16.9 vs 83.1	113.2
	Octocog alfa (Kovaltry®) (74)	0.0	NR	36.5 vs 63.5	100
Olivieri et al. [36] (Germany)	Efmoroctocog alfa (47)	0.0	78.7	76.5 vs 23.5	87.0
	Lonoctocog alfa (40)	0.0	75	82.5 vs 17.5	61.5
	Octocog alfa (Advate®) (58)	0.0	58.6	37.9 vs 62.1	87.5
	Octocog alfa (Kovaltry®) (40)	0.0	55	35 vs 65	96.3
	Moroctocog alfa (40)	0.0	57.5	50 vs 50	79
Shrestha et al. [52] (USA)	Efmoroctocog alfa (83)	1.8 [3.3 at BL]	NR	NR	NR
	Lonoctocog alfa (118)	2.8 [3.5 at BL]	NR	NR	NR
Yan et al. [51] (USA)	Efmoroctocog alfa (40)	2.0	22.5	65 vs 35	108.5
	Lonoctocog alfa (40)	2.0	25	70 vs 30	91.9
	Rurioctocog alfa pegol (40)	3.0	17.5	72.5 vs 27.5	97.6
	Octocog alfa (Advate®) (40)	2.0	17.5	25 vs 75	114.0
	Octocog alfa (Kovaltry®) (40)	3.0	10	47.5 vs 52.5	95.1
	rFVIII-FS (Kogenate®) (40)	2.0	7.5	40 vs 60	102.5

Pts had been treated for ≥ 8 wks [36, 38, 51] or ≥ 6 months [52] at the time of data collection

ABR annualized bleeding rate, BL baseline, CFC clotting factor consumption, IF injection frequency, IU international unit, NR not reported, pts patients, rFVIII recombinant FVIII, rFVIII-FS sucrose-formulated rFVIII, wk(s) week(s)

*p = 0.001 vs rFVIII

aMedian values, except for Shrestha et al. [52] (average values)

The effectiveness of efmoroctocog alfa for perioperative haemostasis in clinical practice in Europe has also been confirmed in retrospective real-world studies in a total of 47 PTPs with severe haemophilia A (35 from Ireland [53]; 12 from Nordic countries [54]) who underwent a total of 15 major and 80 minor surgeries [53, 54]. For major procedures, adequate haemostasis on the day of surgery was achieved with one or two efmoroctocog alfa injections; most minor procedures were managed with a single injection [53].

Previously Untreated Patients

The efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa in the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously untreated patients (PUPs) has been evaluated in an open-label, noncomparative, multinational, phase III trial that enrolled males aged < 6 years and weighing ≥ 3.5 kg with severe haemophilia A (PUPs A-LONG) [55, 56].

A total of 103 participants (77.7% aged < 1 year; 19.4% with a family history of inhibitors; 79.6% with a high-risk haemophilia genotype) received ≥ 1 dose of efmoroctocog alfa; these included 81 who started on ET [of whom 69 subsequently switched to prophylaxis (suggested initial regimen of 25−80 IU/kg every 3–5 days)] and 20 who started on prophylaxis. Two patients were not assigned a regimen. Patients were followed for up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was the development of inhibitors; secondary endpoints included bleed control (e.g. ABRs and resolution of acute bleeding episodes) [55].

Efmoroctocog alfa provided effective bleed control in this paediatric patient population [55]. With prophylactic treatment (for a median of 44 weeks), ABRs were low (1.5 overall; zero for spontaneous and spontaneous joint bleeding episodes), the median dosing interval was 3.9 days, and the median yearly FVIII consumption was 5384 IU/kg. With ET (administered for a median of 23.5 weeks), ABRs were 2.24 overall and zero for spontaneous and spontaneous joint bleeding episodes; the median yearly FVIII consumption was 198 IU/kg. A median of one efmoroctocog alfa injection was required for resolution of a bleeding episode; the majority (≥ 80%) of responses to treatment were rated by patients as being ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ [55, 56].

Tolerability of Efmoroctocog Alfa

Efmoroctocog alfa was generally well tolerated and showed a consistent overall safety profile in the phase III A-LONG, Kids A-LONG [12] and ASPIRE [13] studies in PTPs with severe haemophilia A [11-13]. Across these studies, 276 adults, adolescents and children [182 (66%) aged ≥ 18 years; 25 (9%) aged 12−17 years; and 69 (25%) aged < 12 years] received ≥ 1 dose of efmoroctocog alfa as part of either routine prophylaxis, episodic (on-demand) treatment of bleeding episodes or perioperative management. These patients, of whom 200, 151 and 107 were treated for ≥ 104, 156 and 208 weeks, respectively, received a total of 82,024 injections, with a median of 303.5 (range 1−755) injections per patient. The total number of EDs was 80,848, with a median of 294 (range 1−735) EDs per patient. Adverse reactions (ARs), including the development of inhibitors (the primary endpoint in Kids A-LONG [12] and ASPIRE [13]), were monitored for a total of 894 patient-years [6, 7].

Eleven (4%) of the 276 patients reported ARs, the most frequent being arthralgia, headache, myalgia, malaise and rash [each reported by two (0.7%) patients]. Other ARs [each reported in one (0.4%) patient] included angiopathy (vascular pain after injection of efmoroctocog alfa), back pain, bradycardia, chest pain, cough, dizziness, dysgeusia, feeling cold, feeling hot, hot flush, hypertension, joint swelling, lower abdominal pain, and procedural hypotension. No age-specific differences in ARs were seen between adult and pediatric patients. Two patients withdrew from study due to ARs (arthralgia and rash) [6, 7].

No patients developed a neutralizing antibody to FVIII over the course of the A-LONG, Kids A-LONG or ASPIRE studies [6, 11–13]. A 25-year-old patient tested positive for a low-titre (0.73 BU/mL) inhibitor at week 14 in A-LONG, but had negative results upon repeat testing 18 days later and thereafter [7]. No events of anaphylaxis were reported [6].

Efmoroctocog alfa was also generally well tolerated in the phase III PUPs A-LONG study in paediatric PUPs with severe haemophila A [55] (Sect. 3.2). The primary endpoint was the rate of total inhibitor development (calculated by dividing the number of patients who developed an inhibitor by the combined number of patients with ≥ 10 EDs plus those with < 10 EDs who had developed an inhibitor). Inhibitors developed in 28 (31.1%) of 90 patients (87 with ≥ 10 EDs and 3 with < 10 EDs and an inhibitor); high-titre (≥ 5 BU/mL) inhibitors developed in 14 (15.6%) of the 90 patients. The median time to inhibitor development was 9 (range 1−53) EDs. Other serious adverse events included deep vein/central venous access devices-associated thromboses (n = 2) and soft tissue haemorrhage occurring in the context of high-titre inhibitor development (n = 1) [55].

Results for inhibitor development in phase III clinical trials are supported by the findings of real-world studies [57, 58]. The FACTs study [57], for example, is evaluating the effectiveness of efmoroctocog alfa in adolescents and children aged < 18 years with haemophilia A in Japan. In part 1 of this 2-year, prospective, multicentre, observational study, two of the 16 PUPS who were included in the second interim analysis developed low-titre inhibitors [57]. In a retrospective US study, one of two PUPs with haemophilia A developed a low-titre inhibitor (1.4 BU/mL) after 10 exposures to efmoroctocog alfa, although this resolved (i.e. anti-FVIII < 0.6 BU/mL) within eight additional exposures [58]. As expected, none of 41 PTPs with haemophilia A developed an inhibitor after initiating efmoroctocog alfa (range 24−432 EDs) [58].

Dosage and Administration

Efmoroctocog alfa is approved for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A in various countries worldwide, including those of the EU [6], as well as the USA [7] and Japan [8] (Sect. 1). Individual patients may vary in their pharmacokinetic and clinical responses to FVIII replacement therapy with efmoroctocog alfa; the dose and duration of substitution therapy depends on the severity of the FVIII deficiency, on the location and extent of bleeding and the patient’s clinical condition [6-8]. Likewise, regimens for long-term prophylaxis vary by region and by patient age group [6-8].

Local prescribing information should be consulted for guidelines for efmoroctocog alfa regimens for the treatment of bleeding episodes, perioperative management and long-term prophylaxis, as well as for further information, including special warnings and precautions and contraindications.

Place of Efmoroctocog Alfa in the Management of Haemophilia A

The efficacy and safety of efmoroctocog alfa for the long-term prophylaxis, acute treatment and perioperative management of bleeding in male PTPs of all ages with severe haemophilia A was initially demonstrated in phase III clinical trials, including two parent studies (A-LONG and Kids A-LONG) and their extension study (ASPIRE) (Sects. 3.1, 4). Due to flexibility in efmoroctocog alfa dosing, the design of the 4-year ASPIRE study approximated real-world practice [13]. The effectiveness of prophylaxis with this EHL rFVIII preparation in PTPs in clinical practice has subsequently been substantiated in an interim analysis of a prospective real-world study (PREVENT), as well as a large number of retrospective real-world studies (Sect. 3.1.4). Final findings from PREVENT are awaited with interest, as are the results of other ongoing, prospective, real-world studies (A-SURE; A-MORE) (Sect. 3.1.4). As anticipated—and consistent with the results of the phase III studies—no PTPs who received efmoroctocog alfa in a real-world study developed inhibitors (Sect. 4). Of note, the original efmoroctocog alfa population pharmacokinetic model used to design IP dosing regimens was based on clinical trial data in PTPs aged ≥ 12 years with severe haemophilia A (including A-LONG participants) [59]. This model has since been expanded to include PTPs aged < 12 years with severe haemophilia A (based on data from Kids A-LONG) [60]. It has also been externally validated in an expanded, alternative model constructed from real-world data in patients aged ≥ 5 years [61].

Available data from A-LONG, Kids A-LONG and ASPIRE have confirmed the clinical benefits of FVIII prophylaxis (with efmoroctocog alfa) beyond low bleeding rates in terms of improving joint health and HRQOL in PTPs with severe haemophilia A (Sect. 3.1.1). The long-term effectiveness of prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa on joint health is being assessed further in a real-world setting in A-MORE, a 48-month, prospective, noncomparative study in ≈ 300 PTPs of all ages with haemophilia A of any severity. Primary endpoints include target joint development, resolution and recurrence; secondary endpoints include Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD‐US) score and HJHS (Sect. 3.1.4) [30]. As regards the effects of prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa on long-term HRQOL outcomes, fully published data from adults and adolescents treated in A-LONG/ASPIRE are awaited with interest, as are final findings from children treated in Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE. Real-world studies assessing the impact of efmoroctocog alfa prophylaxis on HRQOL are also desirable.

The efficacy and safety of efmoroctocog alfa in the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in male PUPs aged < 6 years with severe haemophilia A has also been demonstrated in a phase III clinical trial (PUPs A-LONG) [Sect. 3.2]. Of note, the rate of total inhibitor development in this study (≈ 30%; Sect. 4) was within the expected range, while that of high-titre inhibitors (≈ 16%; Sect. 4) was reportedly lower than that previously reported in the literature [55]. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only proven strategy to eradicate high-titre inhibitors, although it is both burdensome and costly, often requiring long-term, frequent administration of high(er) doses of FVIII [62]. As such, decreasing ITI treatment time may diminish the negative impact of inhibitor development on patients’ health and HRQOL, as well as reduce the FVIII consumption and related cost associated with this approach [63]. While the immunogenicity of efmoroctocog alfa does not appear to be dissimilar to that of other FVIII products [58], there is evidence from preclinical and retrospective real-world studies to suggest that this EHL rFVIII preparation may allow relatively rapid ITI, possibly due to immunomodulatory effects (upregulation of regulatory T cells and promotion of FVIII-specific T-cell tolerance) attributed to the Fc domain of the molecule [9, 64, 65].

In support of the retrospective data, interim results from a prospective, open-label, multicentre study evaluating efmoroctocog alfa for initial ITI in patients of any age with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors (verITI-8) indicate that this EHL rFVIII preparation may indeed offer a rapid time to tolerization in some individuals [63]. At the time of this analysis, 6 of 14 patients receiving ≥ 1 dose of efmoroctocog alfa for ITI have been successfully tolerized, including five in ≤ 12.5 weeks. Seven patients are continuing ITI [median time on ITI of 16.0 (range 0.1−35.6) weeks], and one has failed [63]. Final findings from this ongoing study are awaited with interest. Furthermore, the final results of another prospective, open-label, multicentre study (ReITIrate) indicated a potential clinical benefit of efmoroctocog alfa for rescue ITI in patients of any age with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors who had failed previous ITI attempts [66]. Of the 16 patients enrolled, nine completed the ITI period (i.e. treatment with efmoroctocog alfa 200 IU/kg/day for ≤ 60 weeks), including four who reached a confirmed negative inhibitor titre (< 0.6 BU/mL) within a median of 19 (range 11–60) weeks. One of the four patients reaching a confirmed negative inhibitor titre was a complete ITI success [66].

Current guidelines do not recommend any one EHL or SHL FVIII preparation over another [3, 67]. In the absence of direct randomized, head-to-head trials, indirect comparisons based on published clinical trials (typically pivotal studies) suggest that prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa requires fewer injections and less weekly FVIII consumption to achieve similar or improved ABRs relative to conventional rFVIII products (octocog alfa, moroctocog alfa, simoctocog alfa and turoctocog alfa) [68], and has comparable [69] (or improved [70]) efficacy and FVIII consumption relative to other EHL rFVIII preparations (i.e. lonoctocog alfa [69], damoctocog alfa pegol [69, 70], rurioctocog alfa pegol [69] and turoctocog alfa pegol [69]).

These results are supported by retrospective real-world studies in which prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa achieved comparable or lower ABRs with fewer injections and, in several cases, less FVIII consumption, relative to conventional rFVIII preparations, and showed comparable efficacy and, in some instances, broadly similar FVIII consumption, to other EHL rFVIII preparations (Sect. 3.1.4). Currently, the 24-month, prospective A-SURE study is comparing the effectiveness and real-world usage of efmoroctocog alfa versus conventional FVIII products for prophylaxis in PTPs of all ages with haemophilia A. Primary endpoints include ABR, injection frequency and FVIII consumption [28, 29]. Positive results from this and other prospective studies designed to show that the potential advantages of EHL over SHL FVIII products (e.g. improved adherence, enhanced HRQOL and increased bleed protection; Sect. 1) are actually realized in a real-world setting, will help define the relative role of EHL FVIII products such as efmoroctocog alfa in the treatment of haemophilia A.

In practice, FVIII product choice may be influenced not only by pharmacokinetic differences and patient preference, but also by cost [67]. Semi-Markov models incorporating joint health data indicate that, for the life-time treatment of severe haemophilia A patients without inhibitors, prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa is cost effective relative to SHL rFVIII from an Italian National Health Service perspective [71] and relative to both SHL rFVIII and rurioctocog alfa pegol from a US healthcare payer perspective [72].

In conclusion, efmoroctocog alfa is an established and effective EHL FVIII replacement therapy for the management of haemophilia A.

Data Selection Efmoroctocog alfa: 526 records identified

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 503 KB)

Digital Features for this Adis Drug Evaluation can be found at 10.6084/m9.figshare.16728433.

First-in-class rFVIII-Fc fusion protein.

Half-life ≈ 1.4−1.8 times that of conventional rFVIII products.

Efficacy and safety demonstrated in phase III clinical trials; effectiveness demonstrated in real-world studies.

Expected rate of inhibitor development in PUPs.

Search strategy: EMBASE, MEDLINE and PubMed from 2016 to present. Previous Adis Drug Evaluation published in 2016 was hand-searched for relevant data. Clinical trial registries/databases and websites were also searched. Key words were efmoroctocog alfa, ELOCTATE, ELOCTA, recombinant Factor VIII Fc, haemophilia A. Records were limited to those in English language. Searches last updated 21 Oct 2021