| Literature DB >> 34742315 |
Tegene Legese Dadi1,2, Girmay Medhin3,4, Habtamu Kebebe Kasaye5, Getnet Mitike Kassie6, Mulusew Gerbaba Jebena7, Wasihun Adualem Gobezie3,8, Yibeltal Kiflie Alemayehu3,7, Alula Meresa Teklu3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The ministry of health (MOH) of Ethiopia recommends 4 or more focused antenatal care (ANC) visits at health centre (HC) or at a higher level of health facility (HF). In Ethiopia, few studies investigated time dimension of maternal health continuum of care but lack data regarding place dimension and its effect on continuum of care. The aim of this study is to estimate effect of place of ANC-1 visit and adherence to MOH's recommendations of MOH for ANC visits on continuum of care rural in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: ANC visit as per MOH recommendation; Health Extension Program; Health post; Intensity of continuum of care; Maternal health services; Place of first ANC visit
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34742315 PMCID: PMC8572478 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01265-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Fig. 1The conceptual framework showing the multilevel factors affecting maternal health continuum of care
Socio-economic characteristics of study participants
| Characteristics of study participants | Unweighted number (n = 1431) | Weighted % |
|---|---|---|
| Women education | ||
| No formal education | 947 | 58.96 |
| Formal education | 484 | 41.04 |
| Husband education (n = 1184) | ||
| No formal education | 561 | 38.67 |
| Formal education | 623 | 61.33 |
| Marital status | ||
| Currently married | 1342 | 96.36 |
| Others | 89 | 3.64 |
| Livelihood | ||
| Women in Pastoralist | 422 | 3.98 |
| Women in Agrarian | 1009 | 96.02 |
| Family size | ||
| Up to 4 peoples | 437 | 33.31 |
| 5–8 peoples | 854 | 55.2 |
| 9 or more peoples | 140 | 11.49 |
| Wealth index | ||
| Lower quintile | 407 | 25.51 |
| Middle quintile | 478 | 32.68 |
| Higher quintile | 546 | 41.81 |
| Head of HH | ||
| Male headed HH | 1310 | 94.24 |
| Female headed HH | 121 | 5.76 |
| Media | ||
| Have no TV or Radio | 938 | 57.08 |
| Have TV or Radio | 493 | 42.92 |
| Accessed health facility in the last one year | ||
| Accessed other HF | 152 | 7.42 |
| Accessed HP/HEW | 1279 | 92.58 |
HHs Households, TV television, HF health facility, HP health post, HEW health extension worker
Exposure to HEP and service awareness about service availability at HP
| Characteristics of study participants | Unweighted number (n = 1431) | Weighted % |
|---|---|---|
| HEP exposure | ||
| No | 332 | 18.97 |
| Yes | 1099 | 81.03 |
| ANC service awareness at HP | ||
| Both (husband & wife) are not aware | 279 | 10.98 |
| At least one of them aware | 414 | 24.66 |
| Both (Husband & wife) are aware | 738 | 64.35 |
| Delivery service awareness at HP | ||
| Both (Husband & wife) are not aware | 747 | 44.41 |
| At least one of them aware | 331 | 21.73 |
| Both (Husband & wife) are aware | 353 | 33.87 |
| PNC service awareness at HP | ||
| Both (Husband & wife) are not aware | 546 | 33.27 |
| At least one of them aware | 405 | 25.8 |
| Both (Husband & wife) are aware | 480 | 40.92 |
| MHS (ANC, Delivery & PNC) awareness by husband and wife at HP | ||
| Both are not aware for all MHS | 242 | 8.88 |
| At least one of them aware | 888 | 62.21 |
| Both are aware for all MHS | 301 | 28.92 |
| Human resource at the HP | ||
| Have level 3 or below HEWs | 526 | 26.88 |
| Have at least one level 4 HEWs | 727 | 73.12 |
HEP health extension program, HP health post, ANC antenatal care, PNC postnatal care, MHS maternal health services, HEW health extension worker, HEWs health extension worker
Fig. 2Maternal health service uptake among fixed cohort of women in Ethiopia
Fig. 3Place of ANC-1 and ANC visits based on MOH recommendation women
Fig. 4Completion of CoC among women who took their ANC-1 at HP and HC or other higher HFs
Fig. 5Intensity of maternal health CoC by MOH recommendation of ANC visits among women
A hypothesis testing that shows effect of MOH Recommended ANC visits on CoC among women
| Effect of ANC visit based on MOH recommendation | IRR (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Crude effect of ANC visit based on MOH recommendation | 1.29 (1.26, 1.33) |
| *Adjusted effect of ANC visit based on MOH recommendation | 1.28 (1.24, 1.32) |
*Adjusted for: exposure status to HEP, maternal age, women formal education, MHS service awareness by wife and husband, danger sign told, facility delivery of second youngest child, wealth index, family size, wife headed HH, livelihood, number of medical equipment, accessed HP, human resource of HP, and media
Factors associated with intensity of continuum of care among fixed cohort of women in Ethiopia
| Background characteristics | Crude IRR (95% CI) | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adherence to recommendation of MOH to ANC | No | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 1.29 (1.26, 1.33) | 1.28 (1.24, 1.32) | |
| Exposure to HEP | No | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 1.11 (1.07, 1.15) | 1.22 (1.16, 1.28) | |
| Age | 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) | 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) | |
| Women education | No formal education | Ref | Ref |
| Have formal education | 1.09 (1.07, 1.12) | 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) | |
| MHS awareness by husband and wife at HP | Both are not aware for all MHS | Ref | Ref |
| At least one of them aware | 1.01 (0.96, 1.05) | 1.06 (1.00, 1.12) | |
| Both are aware for all MHS | 0.94 (0.89, 0.98) | 0.96 (0.96, 1.08) | |
| Told at least one danger sign | No | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 1.17 (1.14, 1.19) | 1.14 (1.11, 1.18) | |
| The second youngest child place of delivery | Home or other place | Ref | Ref |
| Health institution | 1.18 (1.15, 1.22) | 1.16 (1.13, 1.20) | |
| Wealth index | Lower quintile | Ref | Ref |
| Middle quintile | 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) | 0.91 (0.88, 0.95) | |
| Higher quintile | 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) | 0.96 (0.92, 1.01) | |
| Family size | ≤4 peoples | Ref | Ref |
| 5–8 peoples | 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) | 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) | |
| ≥ 9 peoples | 0.88 (0.84, 0.92) | 1.02 (0.96, 1.08) | |
| Head of HH | Husband headed HH | Ref | Ref |
| Wife headed HH | 1.04 (0.98, 1.09) | 0.97 (0.91, 1.03) | |
| Number of medical equipment | 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) | 1.01 (1.01, 1.02) | |
| Media | Have no TV or Radio | Ref | Ref |
| Have TV or Radio | 1.06 (1.04, 1.09) | 1.01 (0.98, 1.05) | |
| Livelihood | Pastoralist | Ref | Ref |
| Agrarian | 1.31 (1.19, 1.42) | 1.17 (1.06, 1.29) | |
| Human resource at the HP | Have level 3 and below HEWs | Ref | Ref |
| Have at least one level 4 HEW | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | 0.93 (0.90, 0.95) | |
| Accessed health facility | Accessed other HF | Ref | Ref |
| Accessed HP/HEW | 1.13 (1.07, 1.18) | 0.94 (0.87, 1.01) | |
| Inflate variables* | |||
| Age | 0.90 ( 0.87, 0.94) | ||
| Women education | No formal education | Ref | |
| Have formal education | 1.89 (2.12, 4.73) | ||
| Head of HH | Husband headed HH | Ref | |
| Wife headed HH | 0.84 (0.19, 3.67) | ||
CI confidence interval, HH Household, HEP health extension program, HP health post, MHS maternal health services; HF health facility, HEW health extension worker, TV television, HEWs health extension worker
*Inflate variables are variables that increases the probability of taking no services. They are selected based on literatures.
Sensitivity analysis of factors associated with intensity of continuum of care among fixed cohort of women in Ethiopia
| Background characteristics | Crude IRR (95% CI) | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adherence to recommendation of MOH to ANC | No | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 1.29 (1.26, 1.33) | 1.25 (1.22, 1.29) | |
| Exposure to HEP | No | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 1.11 (1.07, 1.15) | 1.22 (1.15, 1.28) | |
| Age | 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) | 1.04 (1.01, 1.08) | |
| Women education | No formal education | Ref | Ref |
| Have formal education | 1.09 (1.07, 1.12) | 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) | |
| MHS awareness by husband and wife at HP | Both are not aware for all MHS | Ref | Ref |
| At least one of them aware | 1.01 (0.96, 1.05) | 1.07 (1.01, 1.13) | |
| Both are aware for all MHS | 1.02 (0.89, 0.98) | 0.96 (0.96, 1.08) | |
| Told at least one danger sign | No | Ref | Ref |
| Yes | 1.17 (1.14, 1.19) | 1.14 (1.11, 1.18) | |
| The second youngest child place of delivery | Home or other place | Ref | Ref |
| Health institution | 1.18 (1.15, 1.22) | 1.18 (1.15, 1.21) | |
| Wealth index | Lower quintile | Ref | Ref |
| Middle quintile | 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) | 0.91 (0.88, 0.95) | |
| Higher quintile | 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) | 0.97 (0.93, 1.01) | |
| Family size | ≤ 4 peoples | Ref | Ref |
| 5–8 peoples | 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) | 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) | |
| ≥ 9 peoples | 0.88 (0.84, 0.92) | 1.01 (0.95, 1.08) | |
| Head of HH | Husband headed HH | Ref | Ref |
| Wife headed HH | 1.04 (0.98, 1.09) | 0.96 (0.90, 1.03) | |
| Number of medical equipment | 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) | 1.01 (1.01, 1.02) | |
| Media | Have no TV or Radio | Ref | Ref |
| Have TV or Radio | 1.06 (1.04, 1.09) | 1.01 (0.98, 1.05) | |
| Livelihood | Pastoralist | Ref | Ref |
| Agrarian | 1.31 (1.19, 1.42) | 1.19 (1.08, 1.31) | |
| Human resource at the HP | Have level 3 and below HEWs | Ref | Ref |
| Have at least one level 4 HEW | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) | |
| Accessed health facility | Accessed other HF | Ref | Ref |
| Accessed HP/HEW | 1.13 (1.07, 1.18) | 0.95 (0.88, 1.02) | |
| Inflate variables* | |||
| Age | 0.90 ( 0.87, 0.94) | ||
| Women education | No formal education | Ref | |
| Have formal education | 1.89 (2.12, 4.73) | ||
| Head of HH | Husband headed HH | Ref | |
| Wife headed HH | 0.84 (0.19, 3.67) | ||
CI confidence interval, HH Household, HEP health extension program, HP health post, MHS maternal health services, HF health facility, HEW health extension worker, TV television, HEWs health extension worker
*Inflate variables are variables that increases the probability of taking no services. They are selected based on literatures