Milena Falcaro1, Alejandra Castañon1, Busani Ndlela2, Marta Checchi3, Kate Soldan3, Jamie Lopez-Bernal4, Lucy Elliss-Brookes5, Peter Sasieni6. 1. Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. 2. National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Manchester, UK. 3. Blood Safety, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK. 4. Immunisations and Countermeasures Division, Public Health England, London, UK. 5. National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK. 6. Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Innovation Hub, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: peter.sasieni@kcl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) immunisation with a bivalent vaccine (Cervarix) was introduced in England, UK, in Sept 1, 2008: routine vaccination was offered to girls aged 12-13 years with a catch-up programme for females aged 14-18 years in 2008-10. We quantified the early effect of this immunisation programme on cervical cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ, namely grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3), registrations. METHODS: In this observational study, we used an extension of the age-period-cohort Poisson model to estimate the relative risk of cervical cancer in three vaccinated cohorts compared with earlier cohorts that were not eligible for HPV vaccination. Data from a population-based cancer registry were extracted on Jan 26, 2021, and were assessed for diagnoses of cervical cancer and CIN3 from Jan 1, 2006 to June 30, 2019 in women aged 20-64 years and who were a resident in England. We used three vaccinated cohorts to account for differences in the school year in which the vaccine was offered and its national coverage. Adjustment for confounding was made using information on changes in cervical screening policy and historical events that affected cervical cancer incidence. Results were compared across models with different adjustments for confounders. FINDINGS: We used data from a total of 13·7 million-years of follow-up of women aged 20 years to younger than 30 years. The estimated relative reduction in cervical cancer rates by age at vaccine offer were 34% (95% CI 25-41) for age 16-18 years (school year 12-13), 62% (52-71) for age 14-16 years (school year 10-11), and 87% (72-94) for age 12-13 years (school year 8), compared with the reference unvaccinated cohort. The corresponding risk reductions for CIN3 were 39% (95% CI 36-41) for those offered at age 16-18 years, 75% (72-77) for age 14-16 years, and 97% (96-98) for age 12-13 years. These results remained similar across models. We estimated that by June 30, 2019 there had been 448 (339-556) fewer than expected cervical cancers and 17 235 (15 919-18 552) fewer than expected cases of CIN3 in vaccinated cohorts in England. INTERPRETATION: We observed a substantial reduction in cervical cancer and incidence of CIN3 in young women after the introduction of the HPV immunisation programme in England, especially in individuals who were offered the vaccine at age 12-13 years. The HPV immunisation programme has successfully almost eliminated cervical cancer in women born since Sept 1, 1995. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK. Crown
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) immunisation with a bivalent vaccine (Cervarix) was introduced in England, UK, in Sept 1, 2008: routine vaccination was offered to girls aged 12-13 years with a catch-up programme for females aged 14-18 years in 2008-10. We quantified the early effect of this immunisation programme on cervical cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ, namely grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3), registrations. METHODS: In this observational study, we used an extension of the age-period-cohort Poisson model to estimate the relative risk of cervical cancer in three vaccinated cohorts compared with earlier cohorts that were not eligible for HPV vaccination. Data from a population-based cancer registry were extracted on Jan 26, 2021, and were assessed for diagnoses of cervical cancer and CIN3 from Jan 1, 2006 to June 30, 2019 in women aged 20-64 years and who were a resident in England. We used three vaccinated cohorts to account for differences in the school year in which the vaccine was offered and its national coverage. Adjustment for confounding was made using information on changes in cervical screening policy and historical events that affected cervical cancer incidence. Results were compared across models with different adjustments for confounders. FINDINGS: We used data from a total of 13·7 million-years of follow-up of women aged 20 years to younger than 30 years. The estimated relative reduction in cervical cancer rates by age at vaccine offer were 34% (95% CI 25-41) for age 16-18 years (school year 12-13), 62% (52-71) for age 14-16 years (school year 10-11), and 87% (72-94) for age 12-13 years (school year 8), compared with the reference unvaccinated cohort. The corresponding risk reductions for CIN3 were 39% (95% CI 36-41) for those offered at age 16-18 years, 75% (72-77) for age 14-16 years, and 97% (96-98) for age 12-13 years. These results remained similar across models. We estimated that by June 30, 2019 there had been 448 (339-556) fewer than expected cervical cancers and 17 235 (15 919-18 552) fewer than expected cases of CIN3 in vaccinated cohorts in England. INTERPRETATION: We observed a substantial reduction in cervical cancer and incidence of CIN3 in young women after the introduction of the HPV immunisation programme in England, especially in individuals who were offered the vaccine at age 12-13 years. The HPV immunisation programme has successfully almost eliminated cervical cancer in women born since Sept 1, 1995. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK. Crown
Authors: Jana Smahelova; Eva Hamsikova; Viera Ludvikova; Jitka Vydrova; Joseph Traboulsi; Ondrej Vencalek; Petr Lukeš; Ruth Tachezy Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 8.961
Authors: Jaimie Z Shing; Shangying Hu; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Carolina Porras; Joshua N Sampson; John Schussler; John T Schiller; Douglas R Lowy; Mónica S Sierra; Loretto Carvajal; Aimée R Kreimer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 54.433
Authors: Carlo Ronsini; Maria Cristina Solazzo; Nicolò Bizzarri; Domenico Ambrosio; Marco La Verde; Marco Torella; Raffaela Maria Carotenuto; Luigi Cobellis; Nicola Colacurci; Pasquale De Franciscis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Chloe S Lalonde; Yong Teng; Barbara A Burtness; Robert L Ferris; Rafi Ahmed; Nabil F Saba Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Sarah Louise Coleridge; Alison Wiggans; Ellen Nelissen; Rob Bethune; Richard Blackwell; Andrew Bryant; Jo Morrison Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2022-05