Literature DB >> 34741556

Forecasting future prevalence and gender differences in binge drinking among young adults through 2040.

Jonathan M Platt1, Justin Jager2, Megan E Patrick3, Deborah Kloska3, John Schulenberg3, Caroline Rutherford1, Katherine M Keyes1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Binge drinking among adolescents and young adults has changed over time, but patterns differ by age and gender. Identifying high-risk groups to target future efforts at reducing drinking in this population remains a public health priority. Forecasting methods can provide a better understanding of variation and determinants of future binge drinking prevalence.
METHODS: We implemented regression-based forecasting models to estimate the prevalence and gender differences in binge drinking among cohort groups of U.S. young adults, ages 18, 23-24, and 29-30 through 2040. Forecasting models were adjusted for covariates accounting for changes in demographic, Big-5 social roles (e.g., residential independence), and drinking norms and related substance use, to understand the drivers of forecasted binge drinking estimates.
RESULTS: From the last observed cohort group (years varied by age) through 2040, unadjusted binge drinking prevalence was forecasted to decrease from 26% (95% CI: 20, 33%) (2011-15) to 11% (95% CI: 4, 27%) at age 18, decrease from 38% (95% CI: 30, 45%) (2006-2010) to 34% (95% CI: 18, 55%) at ages 23/24, and increase from 32% (95% CI: 25, 40%) (2001-2005) to 35% (95% CI: 16, 59%) at ages 29/30. Gender-stratified forecasts show a continuation in the narrowing of binge drinking prevalence between young men and women, though the magnitude of narrowing differs by age. Estimated trends were partially explained by changing norms regarding drinking and other substance use, though these indirect effects explained less of the total trend as age increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how covariates influence binge drinking trends can guide public health policies to leverage the most important determinants of future binge drinking to reduce the harm caused by binge drinking from adolescence to adulthood.
© 2021 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; binge drinking; forecasting; gender differences; young adults

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34741556      PMCID: PMC9066164          DOI: 10.1111/acer.14690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.928


  40 in total

1.  A meta-analytic comparison of the effectiveness of smoking cessation methods.

Authors:  C Viswesvaran; F L Schmidt
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1992-08

Review 2.  Predicting the future burden of cancer.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Bjørn Møller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Alcohol use and misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic: a potential public health crisis?

Authors:  James M Clay; Matthew O Parker
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2020-04-08

4.  Historical variation in young adult binge drinking trajectories and its link to historical variation in social roles and minimum legal drinking age.

Authors:  Justin Jager; Katherine M Keyes; John E Schulenberg
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-05-25

5.  Forecasting of spinal cord injury annual case numbers in Australia.

Authors:  Peter J O'Connor
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Educational differences in alcohol consumption and heavy drinking: An age-period-cohort perspective.

Authors:  Camillia K Lui; William C Kerr; Nina Mulia; Yu Ye
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Birth cohort effects on adolescent alcohol use: the influence of social norms from 1976 to 2007.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; John E Schulenberg; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Jerald G Bachman; Guohua Li; Deborah Hasin
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12

8.  Binge drinking among US adults.

Authors:  Timothy S Naimi; Robert D Brewer; Ali Mokdad; Clark Denny; Mary K Serdula; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation.

Authors:  Paul Madley-Dowd; Rachael Hughes; Kate Tilling; Jon Heron
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  What Does Adolescent Substance Use Look Like During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Examining Changes in Frequency, Social Contexts, and Pandemic-Related Predictors.

Authors:  Tara M Dumas; Wendy Ellis; Dana M Litt
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.