| Literature DB >> 34741513 |
Yoo Jin Kim1, Julie A DeLisa1, Yu-Che Chung1, Nancy L Shapiro2, Subhash K Kolar Rajanna3, Edward Barbour3, Jeffrey A Loeb3,4, Justin Turner5, Susan Daley5, John Skowlund5, Jerry A Krishnan1.
Abstract
Chatbots are software applications to simulate a conversation with a person. The effectiveness of chatbots in facilitating the recruitment of study participants in research, specifically among racial and ethnic minorities, is unknown. The objective of this study is to compare a chatbot versus telephone-based recruitment in enrolling research participants from a predominantly minority patient population at an urban institution. We randomly allocated adults to receive either chatbot or telephone-based outreach regarding a study about vaccine hesitancy. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who provided consent to participate in the study. In 935 participants, the proportion who answered contact attempts was significantly lower in the chatbot versus telephone group (absolute difference -21.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -27.0%, -16.5%; P < 0.001). The consent rate was also significantly lower in the chatbot group (absolute difference -3.4%; 95% CI -5.7%, -1.1%; P = 0.004). However, among participants who answered a contact attempt, the difference in consent rates was not significant. In conclusion, the consent rate was lower with chatbot compared to telephone-based outreach. The difference in consent rates was due to a lower proportion of participants in the chatbot group who answered a contact attempt.Entities:
Keywords: Chatbot; electronic consent; recruitment; telephone outreach
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34741513 PMCID: PMC8714282 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc ISSN: 1067-5027 Impact factor: 4.497