David D Berg1, Ahmed A Kolkailah2,3, Ashish Sarraju4, Anne Marie Kerchberger2,3, Mahmoud Eljalby2,3, Darren K McGuire2,3. 1. TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. dberg1@bwh.harvard.edu. 2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 3. Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The cardiovascular benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have increased the focus of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care on comprehensive cardiovascular risk reduction. Herein, we review the results of the cardiovascular outcomes trials of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA, discuss the concepts of relative vs. absolute risk reduction in the context of these trials, and highlight the importance of individualized risk assessment when applying trial results to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: To enable personalized treatment approaches, multiple clinical risk scores have been developed to assess risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with T2DM. In addition, circulating biomarkers of myocardial injury (cardiac troponin) and hemodynamic stress (natriuretic peptides) have been shown to further refine risk prediction of these clinically important cardiovascular complications. When making decisions about whether to initiate SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA, clinicians should consider the anticipated relative and absolute treatment benefits from these antihyperglycemic therapies. Clinicians can use available clinical and biomarker-based risk tools when counseling patients about their individual cardiovascular risk profiles and when estimating absolute treatment benefits from SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The cardiovascular benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have increased the focus of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care on comprehensive cardiovascular risk reduction. Herein, we review the results of the cardiovascular outcomes trials of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA, discuss the concepts of relative vs. absolute risk reduction in the context of these trials, and highlight the importance of individualized risk assessment when applying trial results to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: To enable personalized treatment approaches, multiple clinical risk scores have been developed to assess risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in patients with T2DM. In addition, circulating biomarkers of myocardial injury (cardiac troponin) and hemodynamic stress (natriuretic peptides) have been shown to further refine risk prediction of these clinically important cardiovascular complications. When making decisions about whether to initiate SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA, clinicians should consider the anticipated relative and absolute treatment benefits from these antihyperglycemic therapies. Clinicians can use available clinical and biomarker-based risk tools when counseling patients about their individual cardiovascular risk profiles and when estimating absolute treatment benefits from SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA.
Authors: Steven P Marso; Stephen C Bain; Agostino Consoli; Freddy G Eliaschewitz; Esteban Jódar; Lawrence A Leiter; Ildiko Lingvay; Julio Rosenstock; Jochen Seufert; Mark L Warren; Vincent Woo; Oluf Hansen; Anders G Holst; Jonas Pettersson; Tina Vilsbøll Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mansoor Husain; Andreas L Birkenfeld; Morten Donsmark; Kathleen Dungan; Freddy G Eliaschewitz; Denise R Franco; Ole K Jeppesen; Ildiko Lingvay; Ofri Mosenzon; Sue D Pedersen; Cees J Tack; Mette Thomsen; Tina Vilsbøll; Mark L Warren; Stephen C Bain Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen D Wiviott; Itamar Raz; Marc P Bonaca; Ofri Mosenzon; Eri T Kato; Avivit Cahn; Michael G Silverman; Thomas A Zelniker; Julia F Kuder; Sabina A Murphy; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Darren K McGuire; John P H Wilding; Christian T Ruff; Ingrid A M Gause-Nilsson; Martin Fredriksson; Peter A Johansson; Anna-Maria Langkilde; Marc S Sabatine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Christoph Wanner; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Erich Bluhmki; Stefan Hantel; Michaela Mattheus; Theresa Devins; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher P Cannon; Richard Pratley; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; James Mancuso; Susan Huyck; Urszula Masiukiewicz; Bernard Charbonnel; Robert Frederich; Silvina Gallo; Francesco Cosentino; Weichung J Shih; Ira Gantz; Steven G Terra; David Z I Cherney; Darren K McGuire Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Marc A Pfeffer; Brian Claggett; Rafael Diaz; Kenneth Dickstein; Hertzel C Gerstein; Lars V Køber; Francesca C Lawson; Lin Ping; Xiaodan Wei; Eldrin F Lewis; Aldo P Maggioni; John J V McMurray; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Matthew C Riddle; Scott D Solomon; Jean-Claude Tardif Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sandeep R Das; Brendan M Everett; Kim K Birtcher; Jenifer M Brown; James L Januzzi; Rita R Kalyani; Mikhail Kosiborod; Melissa Magwire; Pamela B Morris; Joshua J Neumiller; Laurence S Sperling Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Steven P Marso; Gilbert H Daniels; Kirstine Brown-Frandsen; Peter Kristensen; Johannes F E Mann; Michael A Nauck; Steven E Nissen; Stuart Pocock; Neil R Poulter; Lasse S Ravn; William M Steinberg; Mette Stockner; Bernard Zinman; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 176.079