Russell N Van Gelder1, Lakshmi Akileswaran2, Kenji Nakamichi2, David Stroman2. 1. From the Departments of Ophthalmology (R.N.V., L.A., K.N.) and Biological Structure and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (R.N.V.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc (D.S.), Emeryville, California, USA. Electronic address: russvg@uw.edu. 2. From the Departments of Ophthalmology (R.N.V., L.A., K.N.) and Biological Structure and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (R.N.V.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc (D.S.), Emeryville, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the characteristics of conjunctivitis associated with human adenovirus E4 (AdV E4). METHODS: Samples and outcomes from 500 patients with conjunctivitis were obtained from the NVC-422 randomized controlled clinical trial comparing auriclosene to placebo. Molecular typing identified 36 cases associated with AdV E4. Signs and symptoms at presentation and at the day 18 endpoint were compared with the larger cohort of 262 subjects with conjunctivitis caused by due to AdV D8. Full viral genomes of 22 AdV E4 isolates were reconstructed. RESULTS: AdV E4 was the most frequently identified adenoviral type in conjunctivitis cases from the United States. Signs and symptoms at presentation were comparable to those associated with AdV D8. Viral load at presentation was comparable between groups but resolution was more rapid in the AdV E4 group. Clinical signs were fully resolved by day 18 in 26 of 36 (72%) patients with AdV E4. Subepithelial infiltrates developed in 12 of 36 (33%) patients with AdV E4 compared with 98 of 215 (45%) patients with AdV D8 (P = .0001). One hundred twenty-four polymorphisms were observed among 22 whole viral genome sequences, which clustered into 3 clades. Patients in each clade developed subepithelial infiltrates. Neither single nucleotide polymorphism analysis nor machine learning approaches identified specific sequence features predictive of presenting signs or outcome. CONCLUSIONS: AdV E4 conjunctivitis may be indistinguishable at presentation from AdV D8-associated disease. Resolution of viral load for AdV E4 appears more rapid than for AdV D8, and the risk for subepithelial infiltrates appears lower. Multiple substrains of AdV E4 are in circulation but all appeared equivalently pathogenic for conjunctivitis. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
PURPOSE: To determine the characteristics of conjunctivitis associated with human adenovirus E4 (AdV E4). METHODS: Samples and outcomes from 500 patients with conjunctivitis were obtained from the NVC-422 randomized controlled clinical trial comparing auriclosene to placebo. Molecular typing identified 36 cases associated with AdV E4. Signs and symptoms at presentation and at the day 18 endpoint were compared with the larger cohort of 262 subjects with conjunctivitis caused by due to AdV D8. Full viral genomes of 22 AdV E4 isolates were reconstructed. RESULTS: AdV E4 was the most frequently identified adenoviral type in conjunctivitis cases from the United States. Signs and symptoms at presentation were comparable to those associated with AdV D8. Viral load at presentation was comparable between groups but resolution was more rapid in the AdV E4 group. Clinical signs were fully resolved by day 18 in 26 of 36 (72%) patients with AdV E4. Subepithelial infiltrates developed in 12 of 36 (33%) patients with AdV E4 compared with 98 of 215 (45%) patients with AdV D8 (P = .0001). One hundred twenty-four polymorphisms were observed among 22 whole viral genome sequences, which clustered into 3 clades. Patients in each clade developed subepithelial infiltrates. Neither single nucleotide polymorphism analysis nor machine learning approaches identified specific sequence features predictive of presenting signs or outcome. CONCLUSIONS: AdV E4 conjunctivitis may be indistinguishable at presentation from AdV D8-associated disease. Resolution of viral load for AdV E4 appears more rapid than for AdV D8, and the risk for subepithelial infiltrates appears lower. Multiple substrains of AdV E4 are in circulation but all appeared equivalently pathogenic for conjunctivitis. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
Authors: Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner Journal: J Comput Biol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: J Hillenkamp; T Reinhard; R S Ross; D Böhringer; O Cartsburg; M Roggendorf; E De Clercq; E Godehardt; R Sundmacher Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2001-10
Authors: Ashrafali M Ismail; Ji Sun Lee; Jeong Yoon Lee; Gurdeep Singh; David W Dyer; Donald Seto; James Chodosh; Jaya Rajaiya Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 5.640