| Literature DB >> 34740139 |
Alistair Wardrope1, Barbara A Dworetzky2, Gregory L Barkley3, Gaston Baslet4, Jeffrey Buchhalter5, Julia Doss6, Laura H Goldstein7, Mark Hallett8, Kasia Kozlowska9, W Curt LaFrance10, Aileen McGonigal11, Bridget Mildon12, Maria Oto13, David L Perez14, Ellen Riker15, Nicole A Roberts16, Jon Stone17, Benjamin Tolchin18, Markus Reuber19.
Abstract
Amongst the most important conditions in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy is the one that manifests as paroxysms of altered behaviour, awareness, sensation or sense of bodily control in ways that often resemble epileptic seizures, but without the abnormal excessive or synchronous electrical activity in the brain that defines these. Despite this importance, there remains little agreement - and frequent debate - on what to call this condition, known inter alia as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), dissociative seizures (DS), functional seizures (FS), non-epileptic attack disorder (NEAD), pseudoseizures, conversion disorder with seizures, and by many other labels besides. This choice of terminology is not merely academic - it affects patients' response to and understanding of their diagnosis, and their ability to navigate health care systems.This paper summarises two recent discussions hosted by the American Epilepsy Society and Functional Neurological Disorders Society on the naming of this condition. These discussions are conceptualised as the initial step of an exploration of whether it might be possible to build consensus for a new diagnostic label.Entities:
Keywords: Conversion disorder; Dissociative seizures; Functional neurological disorder; Non-epileptic seizures
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34740139 PMCID: PMC9308960 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.10.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Seizure ISSN: 1059-1311 Impact factor: 3.414