Literature DB >> 34739635

Molecular profile to guide personalized medicine in adult patients with primary brain tumors: results from the ProfiLER trial.

Alice Bonneville-Levard1, Didier Frappaz2, Olivier Tredan2, Emilie Lavergne3, Véronique Corset3, Vincent Agrapart3, Sylvie Chabaud3, Daniel Pissaloux4, Qing Wang4, Valery Attignon4, Stéphanie Cartalat5, François Ducray5, Laure Thomas-Maisonneuve5, Jérôme Honnorat5, David Meyronet6, Luc Taillandier7, Marie Blonski7, Alain Viari8, Christian Baudet8, Emilie Sohier8, Sylvie Lantuejoul9, Sandrine Paindavoine9, Isabelle Treilleux9, Christine Rodriguez9, David Pérol3, Jean-Yves Blay2.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry and recent molecular technologies progressively guided access to personalized anti-tumoral therapies. We explored the feasibility, efficacy, and the impact of molecular profiling in patients with advanced brain tumors. This multicentric prospective trial ProfiLER enrolled patients with primary brain tumors, who have been pre-treated with at least one line of anti-cancer treatment, and for whom molecular profiles had been achieved using next-generation sequencing and/or comparative genomic hybridization on fresh or archived samples from tumor, relapse, or biopsies. A molecular tumor board weekly analyzed results and proposed molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT). From February 2013 to December 2015, we enrolled 141 patients with primary brain tumor and analyzed 105 patients for whom tumor genomic profiles had been achieved. Histology mainly identified glioblastoma (N = 46, 44%), low-grade glioma (N = 26, 25%), high-grade glioma (N = 12, 11%), and atypical and anaplastic meningioma (N = 8, 8%). Forty-three (41%) patients presented at least one actionable molecular alteration. Out of 61 alterations identified, the most frequent alterations occurred in CDKN2A (N = 18), EGFR (N = 12), PDGFRa (N = 8), PTEN (N = 8), CDK4 (N = 7), KIT (N = 6), PIK3CA (N = 5), and MDM2 (N = 3). Sixteen (15%) patients could not be proposed for a MBRT due to early death (N = 5), lack of available clinical trials (N = 9), or inappropriate results (N = 2). Only six (6%) of the 27 (26%) patients for whom a MBRT had been proposed finally initiated MBRT (everolimus (N = 3), erlotinib (N = 1), ruxolitinib (N = 1), and sorafenib (N = 1)), but discontinued treatment for toxicity (N = 4) or clinical progression (N = 2). High-throughput sequencing in patients with brain tumors may be routinely performed, especially when macroscopic surgery samples are available; nevertheless delays should be reduced. Criteria for clinical trial enrollment should be reconsidered in patients with brain tumors, and a panel of genes specifically dedicated to neurologic tumors should be developed to help decision-making in clinical practice.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Molecular profiling; Precision medicine; Primary brain tumor; Targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34739635     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-021-01536-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  1 in total

1.  EANO, SNO and Euracan consensus review on the current management and future development of intracranial germ cell tumors in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Didier Frappaz; Girish Dhall; Matthew J Murray; Stuart Goldman; Cecile Faure Conter; Jeffrey Allen; Rolf Dieter Kortmann; Daphne Haas-Kogen; Giovanni Morana; Jonathan Finlay; James C Nicholson; Ute Bartels; Mark Souweidane; Stefan Schönberger; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Patricia Robertson; Assunta Albanese; Claire Alapetite; Thomas Czech; Chin C Lau; Patrick Wen; David Schiff; Dennis Shaw; Gabriele Calaminus; Eric Bouffet
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 13.029

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.