Cerebral amyloid load determination in a clinical setting: interpretation of amyloid biomarker discordances aided by tau and neurodegeneration measurements.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis can be hindered by amyloid biomarkers discordances.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to interpret discordances between amyloid positron emission tomography (Amy-PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (Aβ42 and Aβ42/40), using Amy-PET semiquantitative analysis, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET pattern, and CSF assays.
METHOD: Thirty-six subjects with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, assessed by neuropsychological tests, structural and functional imaging, and CSF assays (Aβ42, Aβ42/40, p-tau, t-tau), were retrospectively examined. Amy-PET and FDG-PET scans were analyzed by visual assessment and voxel-based analysis. SUVR were calculated on Amy-PET scans.
RESULTS: Groups were defined basing on the agreement among CSF Aβ42 (A), CSF Aβ42/40 Ratio (R), and Amy-PET (P) dichotomic results ( ±). In discordant groups, CSF assays, Amy-PET semiquantification, and FDG-PET patterns supported the diagnosis suggested by any two agreeing amyloid biomarkers. In groups with discordant CSF Aβ42, the ratio always agrees with Amy-PET results, solving both false-negative and false-positive Aβ42 results, with Aβ42 levels close to the cut-off in A + R-P- subjects. The A + R + P- group presented high amyloid deposition in relevant areas, such as precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and dorsolateral frontal inferior cortex at semiquantitative analysis.
CONCLUSION: The amyloid discordant cases could be overcome by combining CSF Aβ42, CSF ratio, and Amy-PET results. The concordance of any 2 out of the 3 biomarkers seems to reveal the remaining one as a false result. A cut-off point review could avoid CSF Aβ42 false-negative results. The regional semiquantitative Amy-PET analysis in AD areas, such as precuneus and PCC, could increase the accuracy in AD diagnosis.