Literature DB >> 34739613

Attitudes, practices and perspectives on imaging strategies in prostate cancer: a national cross-sectional survey involving expert radiation oncologists on behalf of AIRO (Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology) GU group.

Raffaella Lucchini1, Giulio Francolini2, Fabio Matrone3, Giorgia Timon4, Ciro Franzese5, Giulia Marvaso6,7, Paolo Borghetti8, Luca Nicosia9, Luca Eolo Trodella10, Annamaria Vinciguerra11, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa6,7, Stefano Arcangeli12.   

Abstract

Although high sensitive imaging modalities such as MRI and PSMA PET/CT are becoming available for prostate cancer (PCa), the clinical benefit of an earlier detection of subclinical disease remains yet undetermined. Given these uncertainties, univocal recommendations are often lacking. The present survey was therefore developed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) to collect the opinion of expert radiation oncologists and delineate a representation of current clinical practice in our country. A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in Italy by administering an anonymous questionnaire to experienced radiation oncologists, representative of the genitourinary (GU) tumor board at their Institution, using the cloud-based platform SurveyMonkey®. For each question, a consensus was achieved when ≥ 75% of the responders agreed on the same response. Thirty nine AIRO members from different Italian centers who were deemed experts in GU field accessed the proposed survey and completed all sections. Explored topics included staging of organ-confined disease, management of biochemical and local recurrence, imaging in the metastatic setting, imaging following metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), and future considerations. Response rate for single item of the questionnaire ranged between 51.2% and 100%. Expert GU AIRO members agree that advanced molecular and functional imaging are expanding their role in local and distant staging of PCa, as well as in the oncologic management and in the assessment of treatment response. However, many controversial issues still exist on the best timing for a diagnostic evaluation and the most appropriate imaging to aim at this purpose.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; MRI; PSMA PET/CT; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34739613     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-021-01597-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  3 in total

1.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021.

Authors:  Edward Schaeffer; Sandy Srinivas; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Andrew J Armstrong; Justin E Bekelman; Heather Cheng; Anthony Victor D'Amico; Brian J Davis; Neil Desai; Tanya Dorff; James A Eastham; Thomas A Farrington; Xin Gao; Eric Mark Horwitz; Joseph E Ippolito; Michael R Kuettel; Joshua M Lang; Rana McKay; Jesse McKenney; George Netto; David F Penson; Julio M Pow-Sang; Robert Reiter; Sylvia Richey; Mack Roach Iii; Stan Rosenfeld; Ahmad Shabsigh; Daniel E Spratt; Benjamin A Teply; Jonathan Tward; Dorothy A Shead; Deborah A Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Postoperative radiotherapy after upfront radical prostatectomy: debated issues at a turning point-a survey exploring management trends on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology).

Authors:  G Francolini; G Timon; F Matrone; G Marvaso; L Nicosia; L Ognibene; A Vinciguerra; L E Trodella; C Franzese; P Borghetti; B A Jereczek-Fossa; S Arcangeli
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.

Authors:  Michael S Hofman; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Roslyn J Francis; Colin Tang; Ian Vela; Paul Thomas; Natalie Rutherford; Jarad M Martin; Mark Frydenberg; Ramdave Shakher; Lih-Ming Wong; Kim Taubman; Sze Ting Lee; Edward Hsiao; Paul Roach; Michelle Nottage; Ian Kirkwood; Dickon Hayne; Emma Link; Petra Marusic; Anetta Matera; Alan Herschtal; Amir Iravani; Rodney J Hicks; Scott Williams; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.