PURPOSE: Forkhead Box Protein 3 (FoxP3) is known as a key mediator in the immunosuppressive function of regulatory T-cells (Tregs). The aim of our study was to investigate whether FoxP3-positive Tregs have the potential to act as an independent predictor in progression as well as in regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, especially in patients with intermediate cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II). METHODS: Nuclear FoxP3 expression was immunohistochemically analysed in 169 patient samples (CIN I, CIN II with regressive course, CIN II with progressive course, CIN III). The median numbers were calculated for each slide and correlated with the histological CIN grade. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 26 (Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation). RESULTS: An increased FoxP3 expression in CIN II with progression could be detected in comparison to CIN II with regression (p = 0.003). Total FoxP3 expression (epithelium and dysplasia-connected stroma) was higher in more advanced CIN grades (p < 0.001 for CIN I vs. CIN II; p = 0.227 for CIN II vs. CIN III). A positive correlation could be detected between FoxP3-positive cells in epithelium and total FoxP3 expression (Spearman's Rho: 0,565; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Expression of FoxP3 could be a helpful predictive factor to assess the risks of CIN II progression. As a prognosticator for regression and progression in cervical intraepithelial lesions it might thereby help in the decision process regarding surgical treatment vs. watchful waiting strategy to prevent conisation-associated risks for patients in child-bearing age. In addition, the findings support the potential of Tregs as a target for immune therapy in cervical cancer patients.
PURPOSE: Forkhead Box Protein 3 (FoxP3) is known as a key mediator in the immunosuppressive function of regulatory T-cells (Tregs). The aim of our study was to investigate whether FoxP3-positive Tregs have the potential to act as an independent predictor in progression as well as in regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, especially in patients with intermediate cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II). METHODS: Nuclear FoxP3 expression was immunohistochemically analysed in 169 patient samples (CIN I, CIN II with regressive course, CIN II with progressive course, CIN III). The median numbers were calculated for each slide and correlated with the histological CIN grade. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 26 (Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation). RESULTS: An increased FoxP3 expression in CIN II with progression could be detected in comparison to CIN II with regression (p = 0.003). Total FoxP3 expression (epithelium and dysplasia-connected stroma) was higher in more advanced CIN grades (p < 0.001 for CIN I vs. CIN II; p = 0.227 for CIN II vs. CIN III). A positive correlation could be detected between FoxP3-positive cells in epithelium and total FoxP3 expression (Spearman's Rho: 0,565; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Expression of FoxP3 could be a helpful predictive factor to assess the risks of CIN II progression. As a prognosticator for regression and progression in cervical intraepithelial lesions it might thereby help in the decision process regarding surgical treatment vs. watchful waiting strategy to prevent conisation-associated risks for patients in child-bearing age. In addition, the findings support the potential of Tregs as a target for immune therapy in cervical cancer patients.
Authors: Camila M Bonin; Cacilda T J Padovani; Izaías P da Costa; Leandro S Ávila; Alda Maria T Ferreira; Carlos Eurico S Fernandes; Andrielli R Dos Santos; Inês Aparecida Tozetti Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 2.327
Authors: Hyun Cheol Chung; Willeke Ros; Jean-Pierre Delord; Ruth Perets; Antoine Italiano; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Lyudmila Manzuk; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Lei Xu; Susan Zeigenfuss; Scott K Pruitt; Alexandra Leary Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Abate Assefa Bashaw; Siok M Teoh; Zewen K Tuong; Graham R Leggatt; Ian H Frazer; Janin Chandra Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Teresa M Darragh; Terence J Colgan; J Thomas Cox; Debra S Heller; Michael R Henry; Ronald D Luff; Timothy McCalmont; Ritu Nayar; Joel M Palefsky; Mark H Stoler; Edward J Wilkinson; Richard J Zaino; David C Wilbur Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Tyler J Curiel; George Coukos; Linhua Zou; Xavier Alvarez; Pui Cheng; Peter Mottram; Melina Evdemon-Hogan; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Lin Zhang; Matthew Burow; Yun Zhu; Shuang Wei; Ilona Kryczek; Ben Daniel; Alan Gordon; Leann Myers; Andrew Lackner; Mary L Disis; Keith L Knutson; Lieping Chen; Weiping Zou Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-08-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: S Chellappan; V B Kraus; B Kroger; K Munger; P M Howley; W C Phelps; J R Nevins Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-05-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alessandra Colamatteo; Fortunata Carbone; Sara Bruzzaniti; Mario Galgani; Clorinda Fusco; Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco; Francesca Di Rella; Paola de Candia; Veronica De Rosa Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 7.561