Literature DB >> 34739578

Large thyroid nodules: should size alone matter?

Joyce Zhi'en Tang1, Jasmine Ming Er Chua2, Tian Kai Woon2, Bien Soo Tan2, Kimberley Liqin Kiong3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of thyroid nodules ≥ 4 cm is controversial due to conflicting evidence on the prevalence of malignancy and diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Some literature recommends routine excision of large thyroid nodules due to high cytology false negative rates (FNR). We aim to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC, prevalence of malignancy in large (≥ 4 cm) thyroid nodules compared to nodules < 4 cm, and the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of those large nodules with false negative cytology.
METHODS: This was a retrospective case-log review in a tertiary referral hospital. All thyroid nodules subjected to Ultrasound (US)-guided FNAC by the Interventional Radiology department between December 2011 and November 2017 were included. Data on patient demographics, thyroid US features, cytology findings, and surgical histology were collected and analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, and FNR were calculated based on FNAC results and final post-operative histology. Factors associated with a false negative result were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 4982 nodules were studied, including 4419 < 4 cm and 563 ≥ 4 cm. Malignancy rates were similar in both groups. For nodules ≥ 4 cm, FNAC sensitivity was 40%, specificity 100%, and FNR 6.6% compared to 4.2% in nodules < 4 cm. Within malignant nodules, there was a significantly higher proportion of follicular and Hurthle cell carcinomas in nodules ≥ 4 cm. Amongst nodules ≥ 4 cm, multivariate analysis revealed male gender to be an independent predictor of FNR (OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.29-8.59).
CONCLUSION: Larger nodules ≥ 4 cm have a similar malignancy rate as nodules < 4 cm, and FNAC FNR is low at 6.6%. Management of large thyroid nodules should be individualized based on their clinical, sonographic and cytological features rather than routine surgery.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytology; Histopathology; Thyroid cancer; Thyroid nodules; Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34739578     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07151-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  27 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of conventional versus sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  D Danese; S Sciacchitano; A Farsetti; M Andreoli; A Pontecorvi
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee.

Authors:  Franklin N Tessler; William D Middleton; Edward G Grant; Jenny K Hoang; Lincoln L Berland; Sharlene A Teefey; John J Cronan; Michael D Beland; Terry S Desser; Mary C Frates; Lynwood W Hammers; Ulrike M Hamper; Jill E Langer; Carl C Reading; Leslie M Scoutt; A Thomas Stavros
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.568

4.  Large cystic/solid thyroid nodules: a potential false-negative fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  J B Meko; J A Norton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

Authors:  Edmund S Cibas; Syed Z Ali
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.568

6.  Reliability of fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules greater than or equal to 4 cm.

Authors:  Maria B Albuja-Cruz; Melanie Goldfarb; Stephen S Gondek; Bassan J Allan; John I Lew
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  The incidence of cancer and rate of false-negative cytology in thyroid nodules greater than or equal to 4 cm in size.

Authors:  Kelly L McCoy; Noel Jabbour; Jennifer B Ogilvie; N Paul Ohori; Sally E Carty; John H Yim
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Predictive index for carcinoma of thyroid nodules and its integration with fine-needle aspiration cytology.

Authors:  Bekir Kuru; Nese Ersoz Gulcelik; Mehmet Ali Gulcelik; Halil Dincer
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid combined with an evaluation of clinical and radiologic factors.

Authors:  J F Carrillo; M Frias-Mendivil; F J Ochoa-Carrillo; M Ibarra
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.591

10.  Comparison of palpation-versus ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Ahmet Selcuk Can; Kamil Peker
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.