BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact patient outcomes in trauma. Census data are often used to account for SDOH; however, there is no consensus on which variables are most important. Social vulnerability indices offer the advantage of combining multiple constructs into a single variable. Our objective was to determine if incorporation of SDOH in patient-level risk-adjusted outcome modeling improved predictive performance. METHODS: We evaluated two social vulnerability indices at the zip code level: Distressed Community Index (DCI) and National Risk Index (NRI). Individual variable combinations from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's SDOH data set were used for comparison. Patients were obtained from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study 2000 to 2020. These measures were added to a validated base mortality prediction model with comparison of area under the curve and Bayesian information criterion. We performed center benchmarking using risk-standardized mortality ratios to evaluate change in rank and outlier status based on SDOH. Geospatial analysis identified geographic variation and autocorrelation. RESULTS: There were 449,541 patients included. The DCI and NRI were associated with an increase in mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03 per 10% percentile rank increase; p < 0.01, respectively). The DCI, NRI, and seven Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality variables also improved base model fit but discrimination was similar. Two thirds of centers changed mortality ranking when accounting for SDOH compared with the base model alone. Outlier status changed in 7% of centers, most representing an improvement from worse-than-expected to nonoutlier or nonoutlier to better-than-expected. There was significant geographic variation and autocorrelation of the DCI and NRI (DCI; Moran's I 0.62, p = 0.01; NRI; Moran's I 0.34, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Social determinants of health are associated with an individual patient's risk of mortality after injury. Accounting for SDOH may be important in risk adjustment for trauma center benchmarking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiologic, level IV.
BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact patient outcomes in trauma. Census data are often used to account for SDOH; however, there is no consensus on which variables are most important. Social vulnerability indices offer the advantage of combining multiple constructs into a single variable. Our objective was to determine if incorporation of SDOH in patient-level risk-adjusted outcome modeling improved predictive performance. METHODS: We evaluated two social vulnerability indices at the zip code level: Distressed Community Index (DCI) and National Risk Index (NRI). Individual variable combinations from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's SDOH data set were used for comparison. Patients were obtained from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study 2000 to 2020. These measures were added to a validated base mortality prediction model with comparison of area under the curve and Bayesian information criterion. We performed center benchmarking using risk-standardized mortality ratios to evaluate change in rank and outlier status based on SDOH. Geospatial analysis identified geographic variation and autocorrelation. RESULTS: There were 449,541 patients included. The DCI and NRI were associated with an increase in mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03 per 10% percentile rank increase; p < 0.01, respectively). The DCI, NRI, and seven Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality variables also improved base model fit but discrimination was similar. Two thirds of centers changed mortality ranking when accounting for SDOH compared with the base model alone. Outlier status changed in 7% of centers, most representing an improvement from worse-than-expected to nonoutlier or nonoutlier to better-than-expected. There was significant geographic variation and autocorrelation of the DCI and NRI (DCI; Moran's I 0.62, p = 0.01; NRI; Moran's I 0.34, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Social determinants of health are associated with an individual patient's risk of mortality after injury. Accounting for SDOH may be important in risk adjustment for trauma center benchmarking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiologic, level IV.
Authors: Kimon L H Ioannides; Avi Baehr; David N Karp; Douglas J Wiebe; Brendan G Carr; Daniel N Holena; M Kit Delgado Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: C H Lasecki; F C Mujica; S Stutsman; A Y Williams; L Ding; J D Simmons; S B Brevard Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Gitta H Lubke; Ian Campbell; Dan McArtor; Patrick Miller; Justin Luningham; Stéphanie M van den Berg Journal: Struct Equ Modeling Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 6.125
Authors: Daniel N Holena; Douglas J Wiebe; Brendan G Carr; Jesse Y Hsu; Jason L Sperry; Andrew B Peitzman; Patrick M Reilly Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-12-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Daniel N Holena; Elinore J Kaufman; Justin Hatchimonji; Brian P Smith; Ruiying Xiong; Thomas E Wasser; M Kit Delgado; Douglas J Wiebe; Brendan G Carr; Patrick M Reilly Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.697