Literature DB >> 34738590

The use of resected SMAS as autologous graft for the correction of nasolabial folds during rejuvenating procedures.

Alessandro Innocenti1, Dario Melita2, Marco Innocenti3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Despite several techniques are proposed, treatment of nasolabial folds is often challenging. During rejuvenation procedures, the SMAS could be redraped or partially resected during the procedure. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of obtained SMAS strip as autologous graft, because of its solid but pliable consistence and fatty composition, to correct nasolabial folds during procedures with SMAS resection.Methods Between 2015 and 2018, 23 patients underwent SMAS graft for nasolabial fold correction. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia and no other cosmetic treatments, including HA fillers, have been done in the past 12 months.
RESULTS: 22 patients were declared eligible for the study. 20 patients were female, accounting for 90,91%. Mean age was 53 years old. Ancillary procedures were performed in 17 patients, including upper blepharoplasty (3, 13,63%), upper and lower blepharoplasty (5, 22,73%) and submental neck lift with platysma plication (15, 68,18%). Mean follow-up was 9 months. No major complications have been recorded: only 1 case of minimal hematoma in the retroauricular region have been recorded and 1 patient required laser treatment for pathological scars. At follow-up, graft is completely integrated into the mid-fat compartment. As evinced from the FACE-Q analysis, the overall satisfaction rate is extremely high. These are very convincing data regarding the effectiveness of the technique and, despite a little bit longer downtime, is not invasive and led to natural long-lasting results event during motion.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of SMAS graft during face-lift as nasolabial fold filler results in a satisfactory but natural filling of the folds, reducing the need for lateral tension and therefore assuring more natural results. Since its nature, SMAS, reduced in width to properly fit into the nasolabial fold, can be considered as an optimal autologous graft for replenish loss volumes of the face with aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34738590      PMCID: PMC8689304          DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.10056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomed        ISSN: 0392-4203


Introduction

Despite several techniques are proposed, including the use of filler or fat grafting, treatment of nasolabial folds during aging process is difficult, even during facial rejuvenation surgeries. During rhytidectomy, the superficial musculoaponeurotic system could be redraped or partially resected during the procedure and, because of its soft but pliable consistence, SMAS could be grafted to correct nasolabial folds. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of obtained SMAS strip as autologous graft to correct nasolabial fold in patients underwent rhytidectomy, evaluating satisfaction with the results obtained with an “old-school” technique.

Surgical Technique

A standard rhytidectomy with lateral SMASectomy is performed by authors under local anesthesia with mild IV sedation. Ideal candidates for this surgery are patients in their 40s or 50s, with skin laxity and good skin elasticity. The goal of the procedure is to rejuvenate the aging appearance of the face. Preoperative photos were taken under the same light conditions. Patients were marked in upright position for surgical planning. Local anesthesia was performed right after IV sedation (100 mL sodium chloride 0.9%, 20 mL Lidocaine 2%, 10 mL Ropivacaine at 10 mg/mL and 1: 100000 epinephrine). Preauricular incision extended to the retroauricular region were performed. Skin and subcutaneous tissues were undermined over the parotid fascia with facelift scissor, under direct vision to avoid damage to important structures, for the area previously marked. A strip of SMAS (mean length: 4.2 cms, from 3.6 to 5.1 cms) is excised and placed in cold saline solution till the end of the rhytidectomy. SMAS is closed with 3/0 Lactomer suture and skin repositioned with excision of excess tissues. With the use of a 11-blade, two incisions, according to “Langer” lines are performed for each side in the nasolabial fold: the upper one surrounding the lateral border of the base of the ala nasali and the lower one at the most distant part of the nasolabial fold where usually a small triangular concave area can be identified. With a 15 cm long and 2 mm cannula, with a cutting flat edge, a subcutaneous tunnel is performed, with simultaneous release of any fibrous attachment to the overlying tissue. SMAS graft is thinned and rolled according to the entity of the defect. Therefore, it is anchored to a Casagrande needle and passed into the tissue. No internal suturing of the graft is required, but minimal movements are mandatory to avoid displacement and ensure a higher percentage of graft survival. No compressive medications are applied to the region and cutaneous access are closed with non-reabsorbable sutures and removed at the first postoperative control (5th POD).

Material and Methods

Between 2015 and 2018, 23 patients underwent SMAS graft for nasolabial fold correction. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia and no other cosmetic treatments, including HA fillers, have been done in the past 12 months. All patients signed a written consent. Including criteria: age> 18 years old, underwent facial rejuvenation surgical procedure with SMAS strip graft for nasolabial fold, no previously facelift procedures, responding to the provided FACE-Q questionnaire. Excluding criteria: patients underwent simultaneous fat graft in the nasolabial fold or laser ablative treatment during the same procedure and patients no responding to the questionnaire have been excluded from the study. All patients underwent SMAS graft bilaterally with the previously mentioned technique. Preoperative and postoperative pictures have been collected under the same light conditions with the same camera with a minimum follow-up of three months. At the third months, FACE-Q questionnaire is administered (1,2). Several questionnaires are taken into consideration to obtain a global satisfaction rate, divided into two major categories: A.FACE-Q appearance, including A1.Appraisal of Lines-Nasolabial folds (5 items) A2.Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall (10 items) B.FACE-Q quality of life (QOL), including B1.Aging Appraisal (7 items) B2.Appearance-related psychosocial distress (8 items) B3.Early life impact of treatment (12 items) B4.Psychological function (10 items) B5.Satisfaction with decision (6 items) B6.Satisfaction with outcome (6 items) Patients are required to reply to 64 questions. All questionnaires are completely anonymous and independently analyzed by two statistics unaware of the surgical procedure. Data are then statistically analyzed and reported in a spreadsheet. Pre- and postoperative pictures (minimum follow-up at three months) are analyzed by two independent plastic surgeons, unaware of each other results and of the technique used for nasolabial fold correction. To evaluate the preoperative condition and the postoperative improvement, Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (MFWS) for Nasolabial fold is used as evaluation tool (3). The MFWS comprised three main classes of nasolabial wrinkling: 1, 2, and 3, representing fine, moderate, and deep wrinkles, respectively. A 0 is also used to designate an absence of nasolabial wrinkles. Furthermore, three interclasses could be used to assess wrinkle severity (i.e., 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5) in accordance to the definitions with an estimated wrinkle depth. The definitions of the entire classes of the scale are the following: Class 0 - No wrinkle. No visible wrinkle; continuous skin line Class 0.5- Very shallow yet visible wrinkle Class 1 -Fine wrinkle. Visible wrinkle and slight indentation Class 1.5 - Visible wrinkle and clear indentation and less than 1 mm wrinkle depth Class 2 - Moderate wrinkle. Clearly visible wrinkle, 1- to 2-mm wrinkle depth Class 2.5 - Prominent and visible wrinkle. More than 2-mm and less than 3-mm wrinkle depth Class 3 - Deep wrinkle. Deep and furrow wrinkle; more than 3-mm wrinkle depth Wrinkle depth is based on assessors’ estimation rather than physical measurement.

Results

A total number of 23 patients underwent previously mentioned procedure, but one patient did not accept to respond to the provided questionnaire and therefore excluded from the study. 22 patients were declared eligible for the study. 20 patients were female, accounting for 90,91%. Mean age was 53 years old (ranging from 47 to 61). Simultaneous procedures were performed in 17 patients, including upper blepharoplasty (3, 13,63%), upper and lower blepharoplasty (5, 22,73%) and submental neck lift with platysma plication (15, 68,18%) (4-6). Minimum follow-up was 3 months, maximum was 18 months with a mean follow-up of 9 months (Tab. 1). No major complications have been recorded. All patients experienced bruising and swelling, as usual after a surgical procedure. Only one case of minimal hematoma in the retroauricular region have been recorded, requiring a single percutaneous evacuation and self-limited. One patient required on both side laser treatment for pathological scar in the retroauricular region. These complications are reported but could not be considered as a direct consequence of the SMAS graft. Data resulting from FACE-Q have been reported in a data spreadsheet and analyzed (Tab. 2). Figure 1 illustrate pre- and postoperative photographs of 3 patients at 12-months follow-up.
Table 1.

Demographic data of patients including ancillary procedures and complications.

Patient number Age Gender Smoking Ancillary procedure(s) Complications
152FYesNeck liftNo complications
254FNoNoNo complications
361FNoNeck liftNo complications
447FNoNeck liftNo complications
549FYesNoNo complications
651FNoNeck liftNo complications
751MNoNoNo complications
848FNoUpper blepharoplastyNo complications
957FNoNeck liftNo complications
1058FYesNeck liftPathological scar
1157FNoUpper blepharoplasty, neck liftNo complications
1249FNoupper blepharoplastyNo complications
1352FNoupper and lower blepharoplasty, neck liftNo complications
1451FNoneck liftHematoma
1548FYesNoNo complications
1649FYesneck liftNo complications
1753FNoNoNo complications
1856MNoupper and lower blepharoplasty, neck liftNo complications
1960FNoneck liftNo complications
2059FNoupper and lower blepharoplasty, neck liftNo complications
2151FNoneck liftNo complications
2254FNoneck liftNo complications
Table 2.

Face-Q data reported for each patient and section

Scale Appraisal of Lines-Nasolabial folds Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Aging Appraisal Appearance-related psychosocial distress Early life impact of treatment Psychological function Satisfaction with decision Satisfaction with outcome
Patient SUMRASCHSUMRASCHSUMRASCHSUMRASCHSUMRASCHSUMRASCHSUMRASCHSUMRASCH
1 71832668710131416378417551548
2 5039927080162640100241002387
3 8242446133512262040203612381548
4 9302855185314351834326818591859
5 7183164143811201522368017552068
6 7183369133512261522368019642279
7 503369112612261626399322822173
8 6102855206010131730326816512387
9 6102651226617451834254712381859
10 12472446206015391626285516512168
11 103626511750931937357717552068
12 71828551126932143285517552387
13 7182753195613312246254713481963
14 9303164175012261730254717551963
15 7182651133512261834295817552279
16 6102753175016421730316518592279
17 103633691021931730378422822279
18 93030611021801626316521752387
19 82431641126931937368021752279
20 82435761230931730347420692068
21 61026511542931730347418592387
22 503266154211201626326821752173
19,560,337,6818,530,768,461,5972,2
Figure 1.

A) Preoperative picture of 53-year-old patient; B) 12 months postoperative result; C) Preoperative picture of 48-year-old patient; D) 12 months postoperative result; E) Preoperative picture of 52-year-old patient; F) 12 months postoperative result

Demographic data of patients including ancillary procedures and complications. A) Preoperative picture of 53-year-old patient; B) 12 months postoperative result; C) Preoperative picture of 48-year-old patient; D) 12 months postoperative result; E) Preoperative picture of 52-year-old patient; F) 12 months postoperative result Face-Q data reported for each patient and section The satisfaction rate for “Appraisal of Lines-Nasolabial folds” is 81,5% (mean Rasch Score: 19,5%), with a “Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall” rate of 60,3%. The mean satisfaction rate for the “Satisfaction with outcome” is 72,2%. As evinced from the FACE-Q analysis, the overall satisfaction rate is extremely high. High satisfaction values are obtained with the use of SMAS graft for the section Appraisal of Lines-Nasolabial folds, Satisfaction with facial appearance overall and satisfaction with outcome. These are very convincing data regarding the effectiveness of the technique and, despite a little bit longer downtime, is not invasive and led to natural long-lasting results event during motion. Photographic analysis showed a mean preoperative value for the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale of 2,07/3 as final calculated mean derived from the mean of the results for each evaluator, respectively 2,1/3 and 2,05/3. At three months follow-up, the mean value decreased to 1,192/3 (Tab. 3). These data showed a decrease of 29,5% of the mean value.
Tab. 3:

Preoperative and postoperative values for the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale

Scale Preoperative Evaluation Postoperative Evaluation
Patient Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2
12211
22.52.51.51.5
332.51.51.5
42.52.51.51
52.52.522
62.52.51.52
7221.51.5
82.52.511
92.52.51.51.5
102.5211
11221.50.5
122.52.511
132.52.51.51.5
1422.511
152.52.51.51.5
162.52.51.52
17221.51.5
1822,511
19221.51.5
202210.5
212211
222.52.51.51.5
Mean2,12,051,111,27
Final Mean2,0771,192
Preoperative and postoperative values for the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale

Discussion

Nasolabial folds represent one of the earliest signs of aging and loss of skin elasticity and they usually become apparent in the 30s even if sometimes it can appear in young subjects as congenital morphological expression. Genetic factors, lifestyle, smoking ultraviolet radiations and sever ponderal variations can aggravate or anticipate the process. Currently, several options for nasolabial improvements are available, including artificial dermal fillers, such as hyaluronic acid or polymethylmethacrylate (7), laser resurfacing (8), radiofrequency devices (9), fat grafting (10), HIFU (11) and direct subcision (12). During short-scar rhytidectomy, mobilization of deep tissues ensures more natural results, but often nasolabial folds cannot be satisfactorily achieved. In most cases, patients underwent rhytidectomy previously underwent temporary correction of aging signs but requires long-stable results. The use of SMAS graft during face-lift as nasolabial fold filler results in a satisfactory but natural filling of the nasolabial fold, reducing the need for lateral tension and therefore assuring more natural results. Morphologically, SMAS is composed by thin fibro-muscular septa surrounding fat tissue compartments connecting the skin to a fibrous fascia and mimic musculature (13). Since its nature, SMAS, reduced in width to properly fit into the nasolabial fold, can be considered as an optimal autologous graft for replenish loss volumes of the face with aging. The use of SMAS tissue as graft has been previously reported in literature for different purposes and anatomical regions (14,15). Several authors already described this technique: Lamperti and Moody firstly described the insertion of the SMAS tissue harvested during the facelift procedure into the nasolabial fold, with a visibile scar on the cheek8,10 Calderon suggested to pass the SMAS graft through the nasal mucosa., but this procedure has an higher risk of contamination and infection (16). In 2012 Stenekes proposed nasolabial fold augmentation with SMAS graft in 14 patients through a tunnel in the fold itself, but there was no analysis of patient’s satisfaction (17). Authors decided to analyze patients’ satisfaction with FACE-Q questionnaire, including evaluation of the satisfaction with the results and the associated psychological distress and limitations to the social life. Furthermore, since improvement is a mandatory aspect to be evaluated not only by patients, but also by surgeons, a pre- and postoperative evaluation of the results by the use of a Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale have been also analyzed. Both patients and surgeons’ evaluation showed a dramatic improvement of the satisfaction rate with the SMAS graft for nasolabial folds correction. In our proposed technique, SMAS is passed through a subcutaneous incision in the nasolabial fold at the junction with the nasal ala and at the bottom part of the fold to hide the surgical access. Careful dissection of the SMAS should be performed thus to avoid damage to the tissue itself. This technique has many advantages: with a single incision, it provides an effective rhytidectomy with a natural-looking filling of the nasolabial folds, avoiding puffy and overdone aspect. Lipofilling is a reliable alternative, but, especially in the most severe cases reported very deep fold it requires a secondary surgical site and, especially in skinny patients, the risk for irregularities should be considered. Furthermore, removal of fat tissue is usually painful, increasing patient’s discomfort, and requires in most cases the use of compressive garments. SMAS graft is a totally natural and biocompatible material and, moreover, just a small increase in the downtime is needed for return to social life, mostly due to reactive edema and ecchymosis. Scars do not represent for this technique a sensitive issue, but pathological scar should be always considered even if incisions are minimal.

Conclusions

The use of a strip of SMAS as autologous graft for nasolabial fold correction could be an adjuctive step during facial rejuvenation procedures that may increase the satisfaction rate for the final results in this region, decreasing the need for more aggressive rhytidectomy and avoiding a secondary donor site, with minimal scars and no longer downtime for patients.
  16 in total

1.  SMAS graft of the nasolabial area during deep plane rhytidectomy.

Authors:  Wilfredo Calderon; Patricio R Andrades; Guillermo Israel; Rodrigo Cabello; Patricio Leniz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Autologous superficial musculoaponeurotic system graft as implantable filler in nasolabial fold correction.

Authors:  Marcus W Moody; Thomas S Dozier; Robert F Garza; Michael K Bowman; Daniel E Rousso
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

3.  The modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: a clinical validated measurement tool for nasolabial wrinkle severity assessment.

Authors:  David Shoshani; Elana Markovitz; Stan J Monstrey; David J Narins
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Effects of orbicularis oculi flap anchorage to the periosteum of the upper orbital rim on the lower eyelid position after transcutaneous blepharoplasty: Statistical analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Alessandro Innocenti; Francesco Mori; Dario Melita; Emanuela Dreassi; Marco Innocenti
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Autologous fat transfer in aesthetic facial recontouring.

Authors:  Gloria Mabel Gamboa; William A Ross
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Self-Report Scales to Measure Expectations and Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress in Patients Seeking Cosmetic Treatments.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Amy Alderman; Charles East; Lydia Badia; Stephen B Baker; Sam Robson; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.283

7.  Combination of Fractional Radiofrequency and Thermo-Contraction Systems for Facial Skin Rejuvenation: A Clinical and Histological Study.

Authors:  Aniseh Samadi; Saman Ahmad Nasrollahi; Leila Janani; Zahra Beigom Moosavi; Kambiz Kamyab Hesari; Arash Rezaie Kalantari; Alireza Firooz
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Clinical Outcomes and Complications Associated with Fractional Lasers: A Review of 730 Patients.

Authors:  Steven R Cohen; Ashley Goodacre; Soobin Lim; Jennifer Johnston; Cory Henssler; Brian Jeffers; Ahmad Saad; Tracy Leong
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Evaluation of Subcision for the Correction of the Prominent Nasolabial Folds.

Authors:  R M Robati; F Abdollahimajd; A M Robati
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-16

10.  Refinements in Tear Trough Deformity Correction: Intraoral Release of Tear Trough Ligaments: Anatomical Consideration and Clinical Approach.

Authors:  Alessandro Innocenti; Dario Melita; Serena Ghezzi; Marco Innocenti
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.