| Literature DB >> 34737617 |
Jian-Biao Meng1,2, Ma-Hong Hu2, Ming Zhang3, Gong-Pai Hu4, Wei Zhang5, Shen-Jiang Hu1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore relationships between whole blood copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and Cu/Zn ratio and cardiac dysfunction in patients with septic shock. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between April 2018 and March 2020, septic shock patients with sepsis-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction (SILVSD, left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF<50%) and with no sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (non-SIMD, septic shock alone and LVEF>50%) and controls were prospectively enrolled. Whole blood Cu and Zn levels were measured using flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry.Entities:
Keywords: Cu/Zn ratio; copper; diagnosis; prognosis; sepsis-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction; sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction; septic shock; zinc
Year: 2021 PMID: 34737617 PMCID: PMC8558506 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S335348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Figure 1Diagram of the study.
Basic Characteristics
| Characteristics | Control (n=25) | Non-SIMD (n=45) | SILVSD (n=41) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 66.08±12.12 | 65.53±13.17 | 69.20±10.34 | 0.335 | |
| Male (n, %) | 15 (60.0%) | 29 (64.4%) | 27 (65.9%) | 0.888 | |
| APACHE-II score | 34.20±7.91 | 39.56±10.87 | 0.010 | ||
| SOFA score | 14.82±2.32 | 16.46±3.12 | 0.007 | ||
| Death in 28 days (n, %) | 13 (28.9%) | 17 (41.5%) | 0.222 | ||
| 0.724 | |||||
| Pneumonia (n, %) | 19 (42.2%) | 17 (41.5%) | |||
| Peritonitis (n, %) | 11 (24.4%) | 12 (29.3%) | |||
| CRBSI (n, %) | 8 (17.8%) | 5 (12.2%) | |||
| Urinary tract infection (n, %) | 4 (8.9%) | 6 (14.6%) | |||
| Other (n, %) | 3 (6.7%) | 1 (2.4%) | |||
| 0.867 | |||||
| Hypertension (n, %) | 13 (28.9%) | 16 (39.0%) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus (n, %) | 9 (20.0%) | 10 (24.4%) | |||
| COPD (n, %) | 6 (13.3%) | 5 (12.2%) | |||
| Anemia (n, %) | 2 (4.4%) | 3 (7.3%) | |||
| Stroke (n, %) | 4 (8.9%) | 2 (6.1%) | |||
| PaO2/FiO2(mmHg) | 209.60±57.37 | 197.52±65.41 | 0.364 | ||
| Mechanical ventilation (n, %) | 31 (68.9%) | 33 (80.5%) | 0.218 | ||
| Fluid balance prior to ICU (mL) | 798.20±349.20 | 882.73±303.29 | 0.237 | ||
| HCT | 0.384±0.080 | 0.372±0.082 | 0.518 | ||
| BUN (mmol/L) | 9.76±2.69 | 11.28±3.52 | 0.026 | ||
| Creatinine (µmol/L) | 113.98±48.38 | 135.32±42.64 | 0.034 | ||
| TB (mmol/L) | 27.02±10.09 | 32.83±14.46 | 0.032 | ||
| Albumin (g/L) | 34.74±8.43 | 32.29±9.17 | 0.200 | ||
| AS T(U/L) | 46.15±16.99 | 49.20±15.37 | 0.387 | ||
| ALT (U/L) | 38.04±15.21 | 42.86±16.75 | 0.156 | ||
| MAP (mmHg) | 72.17±10.32 | 69.55±12.49 | 0.290 | ||
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 4.43±1.61 | 5.20±2.20 | 0.066 | ||
| Dosage of NE (µg/kg/min) | 0.39±0.08 | 0.43±0.10 | 0.043 | ||
| Leukocyte (109/L) | 18.48±4.45 | 20.59±6.18 | 0.071 | ||
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 168.63±69.83 | 185.51±60.86 | 0.237 | ||
| TNT (µg/L) | 0.01 (0.01, 0.01) | 0.01 (0.04, 0.01) | 0.78 (1.39, 0.39) | <0.001 | 0.008 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 117 (100, 205) | 1993 (3468, 861) | 6152 (13,794, 3334) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| HFABP (ng/mL) | 8.4 (5.2, 12.0) | 21.30 (29.65, 11.45) | 77.60 (102.80, 45.75) | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| PCT (ng/L) | 0.05 (0.05, 0.05) | 11.73 (25.20, 3.16) | 23.60 (55.81, 15.14) | <0.001 | 0.007 |
| LVEF (%) | 61.44±8.48 | 58.84±8.11 | 34.54±4.44 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
Note: Values are number (proportion), mean±standard deviation (SD) or medians [interquartile ranges (IQRs)].
Abbreviations: SIMD, sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction; SILVSD, sepsis-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; CRBSI, catheter-related bloodstream infection; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; FiO2, fraction of inspiratory oxygen; ICU, intensive care unit; HCT, hematocrit; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; TB, total bilirubin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; NE, norepinephrine; MAP, mean arterial pressure; TNT, troponin T; NT-proBNP, amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; HFABP, heart-type fatty acid binding protein; hs-CRP, hypersensitive C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 2Whole blood Cu, Zn levels and Cu/Zn ratio in SILVSD patients with respect to non-SIMD and control, and partial correlation analysis of whole blood Cu, Zn levels and Cu/Zn ratio with LVEF and NT-proBNP in SILVSD patients. The bars represent the levels of whole blood Cu (A), Zn (B) and Cu/Zn ratio (C) of healthy controls (n=25), non-SIMD patients (n=45) and SILVSD patients (n=41). The curves were plotted by Cu values at admission of 41 SILVAD patients to their respective LVEF (D) and NT-proBNP (E). The curves were plotted by Zn at admission of 41 SILVSD patients to their respective LVEF (F) and NT-proBNP (G). The curves were plotted by Cu/Zn ratio at admission of 41 SILVSD patients to their respective LVEF (H) and NT-proBNP (I). Data are presented as mean±SD. Each circle represents an individual patient. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the levels of whole blood Cu, Zn and Cu/Zn ratio of healthy controls, non-SIMD patients and SILVSD patients. The correlations between whole blood Cu, Zn and Cu/Zn ratio and LVEF and NT-proBNP were analyzed with partial correlation as controlling for fluid balance prior to ICU and HCT.
Figure 3Partial correlation analysis of whole blood Cu, Zn levels and Cu/Zn ratio with APACHE-II score, SOFA score, TNT, HFABP and PCT levels in SILVSD patients. The curves were plotted by Cu values at admission of 41 SILVSD patients to their APACHE-II score (A), SOFA score (B), TNT (C), HFABP (D) and PCT (E) respectively. The curves were plotted by Zn at admission of 41 SILVSD patients to their APACHE-II score (F), SOFA score (G), TNT (H), HFABP (I) and PCT (J) respectively. The curves were plotted by Cu/Zn ratio at admission of 41 SILVSD patients to their APACHE-II score (K), SOFA score (L), TNT (M), HFABP (N) and PCT (O) respectively. Each circle represents an individual patient. The correlations between whole blood Cu, Zn and Cu/Zn ratio and APACHE-II score, SOFA score, TNT, HFABP and PCT were analyzed with partial correlation as controlling for fluid balance prior to ICU and HCT.
Figure 4ROC curves for the prediction of SILVSD. ROC curves present sensitivity and specificity of Cu, Zn and Cu/Zn ratio for predicting SILVSD. ROC and AUC were used to evaluate the value of whole blood Cu, Zn concentrations and Cu/Zn ratio for predicting SILVSD.
Figure 5ROC curves for the prediction of 28-day mortality. Whole blood Cu, Zn levels and Cu/Zn ratio were compared between non-survivors (n=30) and survivors (n=56) (A–C). ROC curves present sensitivity and specificity of Cu, Zn and Cu/Zn ratio for predicting 28-day mortality (D). Independent-samples t-test was used to analyze whole blood Cu, Zn levels and Cu/Zn ratio between non-survivors and survivors. ROC and AUC were used to evaluate the value of whole blood Cu, Zn concentrations and Cu/Zn ratio for the prediction of 28-day mortality.