| Literature DB >> 34736231 |
Gregor Kasieczka1, Benjamin Nachman2,3, David Shih4, Oz Amram5, Anders Andreassen6, Kees Benkendorfer2,7, Blaz Bortolato8, Gustaaf Brooijmans9, Florencia Canelli10, Jack H Collins11, Biwei Dai12, Felipe F De Freitas13, Barry M Dillon8,14, Ioan-Mihail Dinu15, Zhongtian Dong16, Julien Donini15, Javier Duarte17, D A Faroughy10, Julia Gonski9, Philip Harris18, Alan Kahn9, Jernej F Kamenik8,19, Charanjit K Khosa20,21, Patrick Komiske22, Luc Le Pottier2,23, Pablo Martín-Ramiro2,24, Andrej Matevc8,19, Eric Metodiev22, Vinicius Mikuni10, Christopher W Murphy25, Inês Ochoa26, Sang Eon Park18, Maurizio Pierini27, Dylan Rankin18, Veronica Sanz20,28, Nilai Sarda29, Urŏ Seljak2,3,12, Aleks Smolkovic8, George Stein2,12, Cristina Mantilla Suarez5, Manuel Szewc30, Jesse Thaler22, Steven Tsan17, Silviu-Marian Udrescu18, Louis Vaslin15, Jean-Roch Vlimant31, Daniel Williams9, Mikaeel Yunus18.
Abstract
A new paradigm for data-driven, model-agnostic new physics searches at colliders is emerging, and aims to leverage recent breakthroughs in anomaly detection and machine learning. In order to develop and benchmark new anomaly detection methods within this framework, it is essential to have standard datasets. To this end, we have created the LHC Olympics 2020, a community challenge accompanied by a set of simulated collider events. Participants in these Olympics have developed their methods using an R&D dataset and then tested them on black boxes: datasets with an unknown anomaly (or not). Methods made use of modern machine learning tools and were based on unsupervised learning (autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, normalizing flows), weakly supervised learning, and semi-supervised learning. This paper will review the LHC Olympics 2020 challenge, including an overview of the competition, a description of methods deployed in the competition, lessons learned from the experience, and implications for data analyses with future datasets as well as future colliders.Entities:
Keywords: anomaly detection; beyond the standard model; machine learning; model-agnostic methods; semisupervised learning; unsupervised learning; weakly supervised learning
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34736231 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ac36b9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rep Prog Phys ISSN: 0034-4885