Literature DB >> 34735079

The importance of peer review to International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Luciano A Favorito1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34735079      PMCID: PMC8691249          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.01.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


× No keyword cloud information.
In 2021 the International Brazilian Journal of Urology received the highest impact factor of his history and this fact was possible because the serious peer review process of our Journal (1). In this year we received more than 800 papers. The peer review system is a very difficult process because is completely free. his process depends of the hard work of the experts in several topics reviewers by on the topic (2). The Editor-in-Chief would like to thanks all the reviewers and specially to the Doctors: Alexandre Danilovic (Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP -São Paulo, SP, Brasil); Ralf Anding (University Hospital Friederich Wilhelms, University Bonn, Germany); Andrew J. Combs (Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA); Eduardo Mazzucchi (Universidade de São Paulo - USP, SP, Brasil); John Denstedt (Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Western University, St. Joseph's Health Care, Ontario, Canada); Fernando Korkes (Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil); Leonardo Abreu (Universidade Estácio de Sá -Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil); Ricardo Miyaoka (Univ. Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil); Silvio Henrique M. Almeida (Universidade Estadual de Londrina - UEL, Londrina, PR, Brasil) and Ubirajara Barroso Jr. (Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, BA, Brasil) who reviewed more than 3 articles during the year and strictly within the deadline, Thanks a lot!!!!!
  2 in total

Review 1.  Medical journal peer review: process and bias.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan D Kaye; Mark V Boswell; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals.

Authors:  Antoni Margalida; M Àngels Colomer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.