Mihnea Traian Nichita Brendea1, Mircea I Popescu2, Virgil Popa1, Polojintef Corbu Dorina Carmen2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital; Oradea-Romania. 2. Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital; Oradea-Romania;Department of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Oradea; Oradea-Romania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and symptom-induced revascularization, and mortality within one year of randomization between two strategies; complete revascularization including non-culprit lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during primary PCI (PPCI) versus complete revascularization during the same hospital admission in patients with multi-vascular coronary artery disease (MVD) presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock. METHODS: We randomized in a 1: 1 manner 100 patients with MVD and STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock who had undergone successful culprit-lesion PCI to either a strategy of complete revascularization with PCI of angiographically significant non-culprit lesions in the index PPCI procedure or to a strategy of complete revascularization during a second procedure that took place during the same hospital admission. RESULTS: The first primary outcome was death within a timeframe of one year and the second a composite of MACCE within a year following complete revascularization. Of the total number of patients monitored, 4% in each of the two groups was associated with the first primary outcome (p=0.984) and the second primary outcome in 6% (p=0.970). There was no statistical difference between outcomes in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with MVD and STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock, there was no difference regarding outcomes when using a strategy of complete revascularization of non-culprit lesions during PPCI or the same hospital admission.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction and symptom-induced revascularization, and mortality within one year of randomization between two strategies; complete revascularization including non-culprit lesions percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during primary PCI (PPCI) versus complete revascularization during the same hospital admission in patients with multi-vascular coronary artery disease (MVD) presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock. METHODS: We randomized in a 1: 1 manner 100 patients with MVD and STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock who had undergone successful culprit-lesion PCI to either a strategy of complete revascularization with PCI of angiographically significant non-culprit lesions in the index PPCI procedure or to a strategy of complete revascularization during a second procedure that took place during the same hospital admission. RESULTS: The first primary outcome was death within a timeframe of one year and the second a composite of MACCE within a year following complete revascularization. Of the total number of patients monitored, 4% in each of the two groups was associated with the first primary outcome (p=0.984) and the second primary outcome in 6% (p=0.970). There was no statistical difference between outcomes in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with MVD and STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock, there was no difference regarding outcomes when using a strategy of complete revascularization of non-culprit lesions during PPCI or the same hospital admission.
Authors: Duk-Woo Park; Robert M Clare; Phillip J Schulte; Karen S Pieper; Linda K Shaw; Robert M Califf; E Magnus Ohman; Frans Van de Werf; Sameer Hirji; Robert A Harrington; Paul W Armstrong; Christopher B Granger; Myung-Ho Jeong; Manesh R Patel Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrzej Ochala; Grzegorz A Smolka; Wojciech Wojakowski; Dariusz Dudek; Artur Dziewierz; Zbigniew Krolikowski; Zbigniew Gasior; Michal Tendera Journal: J Invasive Cardiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.022
Authors: Shamir R Mehta; David A Wood; Robert F Storey; Roxana Mehran; Kevin R Bainey; Helen Nguyen; Brandi Meeks; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Jose López-Sendón; David P Faxon; Laura Mauri; Sunil V Rao; Laurent Feldman; P Gabriel Steg; Álvaro Avezum; Tej Sheth; Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri; Raul Moreno; Gianluca Campo; Benjamin Wrigley; Sasko Kedev; Andrew Sutton; Richard Oliver; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Goran Stanković; Robert Welsh; Shahar Lavi; Warren J Cantor; Jia Wang; Juliet Nakamya; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; John A Cairns Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roberto Scarsini; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian Banning Journal: Interv Cardiol Date: 2020-06-04
Authors: Anthony H Gershlick; Jamal Nasir Khan; Damian J Kelly; John P Greenwood; Thiagarajah Sasikaran; Nick Curzen; Daniel J Blackman; Miles Dalby; Kathryn L Fairbrother; Winston Banya; Duolao Wang; Marcus Flather; Simon L Hetherington; Andrew D Kelion; Suneel Talwar; Mark Gunning; Roger Hall; Howard Swanton; Gerry P McCann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 24.094