Literature DB >> 34734302

Completion of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the modified Konyang standard method.

Min Ho Um1, Seung Jae Lee2, In Seok Choi1, Ju Ik Moon1, Sang Eok Lee1, Nak Song Sung1, Seong Uk Kwon1, In Eui Bae1, Seung Jae Rho1, Sung Gon Kim1, Dae Sung Yoon1, Won Jun Choi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, a surgical method for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has not been standardized. Therefore, this study aimed to introduce a standardized surgical method for SILC, in addition to reporting our experience over 10 years.
METHODS: Patients who underwent SILC at a single institution between April 2010 and December 2019 were included in this study. We analyzed the patient demographics and surgical outcomes according to the surgical method used: phase 1 (Konyang standard method, KSM) comprising initial 3-channel SILC, phase 2 (modified KSM, mKSM) comprising 4-channel SILC with a snake retractor, and phase 3 (commercial mKSM, C-mKSM) using a commercial 4-channel port.
RESULTS: Of 1372 patients (mean age, 51.3 years; 781 [56.9%] women), 418 (30.5%) surgeries were performed for acute cholecystitis (AC), 33 (2.4%) were converted to multiport or open cholecystectomy, and 49 (3.6%) developed postoperative complications. The mean operation time (OT) and length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) were 51.9 min and 2.6 days, respectively. Overall, 325 patients underwent SILC with the KSM, 660 with the mKSM, and 387 with the C-mKSM. In the C-mKSM group, the number of patients with AC was the lowest (26.8% vs. 38.2% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001) and the OT (51.7 min vs. 55.4 min vs. 46.1 min, p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (24.5 mL vs. 15.5 mL vs. 6.1 mL, p < 0.001), and LOS (2.8 days vs. 2.5 days vs. 2.3 days, p = 0.001) were significantly improved. The surgical outcomes were better in the non-AC group than in the AC group.
CONCLUSION: Based on our 10 year experience, C-mKSM is a safe and feasible method of SILC in selected patients, although there were lower percentage of patients with AC compared to other groups.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopy; Single-incision

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34734302     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08856-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  3 in total

1.  [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  E Mühe
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol Verh       Date:  1991-03

2.  One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Navarra; E Pozza; S Occhionorelli; P Carcoforo; I Donini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; M Hertl; N J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.113

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Optimal indication of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using Konyang Standard Method in benign gallbladder diseases.

Authors:  Seung Jae Lee; In Seok Choi; Ju Ik Moon; Dae Sung Yoon; Won Jun Choi; Sang Eok Lee; Nak Song Sung; Seong Uk Kwon; In Eui Bae; Seung Jae Roh; Sung Gon Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2022-09-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.