Literature DB >> 34734099

Predictors of on-task Behaviors: Evaluating Student-level Characteristics.

Natalie M Golaszewski1, John B Bartholomew2, Vanessa L Errisuriz2, Elizabeth Korinek2, Esbelle Jowers2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined students' fitness, body mass index (BMI), and demographics as predictors of observed time on-task (TOT) behaviors as an indicator of behavioral inattention.
METHODS: We collected demographics, fitness estimates, and BMI from 2020 fourth-graders (Mean age = 8.6 (SD = 0.5); 47% girls; 49% white) from 28 schools. We measured TOT through momentary time sampling observations. Three-level linear models were conducted to determine whether characteristics predicted differences in TOT. We tested interactions between characteristics and TOT.
RESULTS: Older students exhibited greater percent of TOT (estimate = 2.34, SE = 1.02, df = 919, t = 2.30, p < .05). Additionally, boys spent less percent TOT (estimate = -3.59, SE = 1.03, df = 906, t = -3.49, p < .05). There were no differences by race/ethnicity, SES, BMI, fitness, or time of day and percent TOT. Furthermore, none of the interactions were statistically significant (p > .15).
CONCLUSIONS: Girls and older students spent more TOT. These findings are of interest to educators and psychologists working on the development of research-based guidelines aimed to support elementary students' engagement in the classroom.

Entities:  

Keywords:  academic engagement; body mass index (BMI); children; elementary school; on-task behaviors; student characteristics

Year:  2021        PMID: 34734099      PMCID: PMC8562880          DOI: 10.14485/hbpr.8.2.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Behav Policy Rev        ISSN: 2326-4403


  30 in total

1.  Fitness, fatness, cognition, behavior, and academic achievement among overweight children: do cross-sectional associations correspond to exercise trial outcomes?

Authors:  Catherine L Davis; Stephanie Cooper
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Steven W Evans; Julie Sarno Owens; Nora Bunford
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2013-11-18

3.  Physically active academic lessons and time on task: the moderating effect of body mass index.

Authors:  Lauren A Grieco; Esbelle M Jowers; John B Bartholomew
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Adolescent Changes in Aerobic Fitness Are Related to Changes in Academic Achievement.

Authors:  Lauren B Raine; John R Biggan; Carol L Baym; Brian J Saliba; Neal J Cohen; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  Pediatr Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.333

5.  Differential development of attention and executive functions in 3- to 12-year-old Finnish children.

Authors:  L Klenberg; M Korkman; P Lahti-Nuuttila
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Validation of the Classroom Behavior Inventory.

Authors:  D Blunden; C Spring; L M Greenberg
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1974-02

7.  Tracking the relationship between children's aerobic fitness and cognitive control.

Authors:  Mark R Scudder; Eric S Drollette; Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Kate Lambourne; Cameron I Fenton; Joseph E Donnelly; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood.

Authors:  Clark McKown; Rhona S Weinstein
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  Attention deficit disorder: a review of the past 10 years.

Authors:  D P Cantwell
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Teachers' ratings of disruptive behaviors: the influence of halo effects.

Authors:  H Abikoff; M Courtney; W E Pelham; H S Koplewicz
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1993-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.