| Literature DB >> 34733978 |
Chenyong Liu1, Yanan Zhao1,2, Shan Qin1, Xiaoqiu Wang1, Yuanyuan Jiang3, Wenzhong Wu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture treatment of chronic insomnia (CI) was effective. Anxiety and depression symptoms of the CI patients were improved to varying degrees after acupuncture treatment. Corticosterone (CORT) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) are involved in the occurrence and development of comorbidity of insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Whether acupuncture can treat insomnia and accompany anxiety and depression symptoms by regulating CORT and 5-HT is still unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic insomnia (CI); acupuncture; anxiety; depression
Year: 2021 PMID: 34733978 PMCID: PMC8506741 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-3845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1Acupoints locations.
Treatment parameters
| Interventions | Acupuncture group | Sham Acupuncture group |
|---|---|---|
| Points | Baihui (GV-20), Yintang (GV-29), Shenmen (HT-7, bilateral), Sanyinjiao (SP-6, bilateral) | Jianyu (LI15, bilateral), Binao (LI14, bilateral), Futu (ST32, bilateral) |
| Depth description | GV-20, GV-24 and GV-29 being inserted 10 mm obliquely. HT-7 being penetrated 10 mm straightly, while SP-6 being perpendicularly punctured 15 mm | All acupoints were inserted 1–2 mm |
| Needle retention time | 30 min | 30 min |
| Needle type | 0.30×25 mm (Huatuo, Suzhou, China) | 0.30×25 mm (Huatuo, Suzhou, China) |
| Needle stimulation | By thrusting and twirling to achieve the sensation of ‘De-qi’ | Without twirling, lifting, and thrusting to minimize the placebo effect by avoiding manual stimulation and sensation of ‘De-qi’ |
| Frequency and duration of treatment sessions | Three times a week for 4 weeks | Three times a week for 4 weeks |
Figure 2Flow diagram.
General information of CI patients in the two treatment groups
| Groups | Cases | Sex (cases) | Age (years) | Disease duration (months) | PQSI (score) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||||
| Acupuncture group | 29 | 13 | 16 | 47.17±14.08 | 2.71±3.22 | 14.17±2.30 |
| Sham acupuncture group | 27 | 10 | 17 | 45.59±12.65 | 2.90±3.55 | 14.78±2.28 |
CI, chronic insomnia.
Comparison of various evaluation indexes between the two groups
| PSQI | Acupuncture group (n=29) | Sham acupuncture group (n=27) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Follow-up | Before treatment | After treatment | Follow-up | ||
| Sleep quality | 2.48±0.57 | 1.48±0.91▲▲** | 1.34±0.86ΔΔ## | 2.52±0.58 | 2.04±0.94▲□ | 2.56±0.58 | |
| Sleep latency | 2.41±0.68 | 1.52±0.87▲▲** | 1.55±1.02ΔΔ## | 2.52±0.7 | 2.07±1.04▲□ | 2.59±0.57 | |
| Sleep efficiency | 2.45±0.57 | 1.34±0.90▲▲** | 1.38±0.98ΔΔ## | 2.67±0.56 | 2.48±0.75 | 2.41±0.57 | |
| Total score | 14.17±2.30 | 7.93±2.77▲▲** | 7.76±4.10ΔΔ## | 14.78±2.28 | 12.48±2.82▲▲□□ | 14.89±1.18 | |
| HAMA | 11.24±1.92 | 7.17±2.29▲▲** | 7.55±2.11ΔΔ## | 11.15±2.23 | 10.48±1.72▲□ | 11.41±1.89 | |
| HAMD | 12.79±2.54 | 7.83±1.65▲▲** | 8.03±1.38ΔΔ## | 12.11±3.33 | 11.48±2.60▲□ | 12.59±1.97 | |
| CORT | 441.90±72.87 | 360.38±72.22▲▲** | – | 430.22±67.89 | 409.11±64.91▲ | – | |
| 5-HT | 439.55±121.14 | 540.79±86.59▲▲** | – | 455.67±89.12 | 476.24±92.23 | – | |
(I) Comparison within the groups: before vs. after treatment, ▲, P<0.05, ▲▲, P<0.01; during follow-up vs. before treatment, ΔΔ, P<0.01; during follow-up vs. after treatment, □, P<0.05, □□, P<0.01; (II) comparison between the acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group: after treatment, **, P<0.01; and during follow-up, ##, P<0.01. PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; CORT, corticosterone; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine.
Figure 3Comparisons of the scores of each PSQI category between the two groups of CI patients. Comparison between before-treatment and after-treatment: ▲, P<0.05; ▲▲, P<0.01; Comparison between before-treatment and at follow-up: △△, P<0.01; comparison between after-treatment and at follow-up: □, P<0.05, □□, P<0.01; Comparison between the two groups after treatment: **, P<0.01; At follow-up, acupuncture group was compared with the control group: ##, P<0.01. PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; CI, chronic insomnia.
Figure 4Comparison of the HAMA and HAMD scores between the two groups of CI patients. (I) Comparison within the groups: before vs. after treatment, ▲, P<0.05, ▲▲, P<0.01; during follow-up vs. before treatment, △△, P<0.01; during follow-up vs. after treatment, □, P<0.05; (II) comparison between the acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group: after treatment, **, P<0.01; and during follow-up, ##, P<0.01. HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; CI, chronic insomnia.
Figure 5Comparison of serum 5-HT and CORT levels between the two groups of CI patients. (I) Comparison within the groups: before vs. after treatment, ▲, P<0.05, ▲▲, P<0.01; (II) comparison between the acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group after treatment, **, P<0.01. 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; CORT, corticosterone; CI, chronic insomnia.