Literature DB >> 34733722

Independent risk factors and feasibility of ultrasound diagnosis of ultrasound-guided non-cytologically diagnostic thyroid nodules.

Cheng Jiang1, Jiandong Chang1, Xiaoyan Chen1, Hao Zhang1, Meina Xu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To explore the independent risk factors and feasibility of ultrasound diagnosis of ultrasound-guided non-cytologically diagnostic thyroid nodules.
METHODS: This study included 200 patients with thyroid nodules that were diagnosed or suspected of being Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 4 nodules between January 2017 and January 2019. All patients received surgical treatment and pathological diagnosis, and were divided into a cytologically diagnostic group and a non-cytologically diagnostic group based on whether they could be diagnosed by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (UG-FNAC). Patients were further divided into benign and malignant groups according to the results of surgical pathology. Logistic regression analysis was used to clarify the risk factors that could not be cytologically diagnosed in TI-RADS 4 nodules. For the diagnosis of benign and malignant nodules, we combined contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and ultrasound elastography (UE) to establish a joint scoring strategy. The diagnostic value of the joint scoring strategy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS: A total of 216 TI-RADS type 4 nodules were detected in 200 patients. Among them, 40 nodules were included in the non-cytologically diagnostic group, and 176 nodules were included in the cytologically diagnostic group. The multi-parameter logistic regression showed that: aspect ratio <1, irregular edge, scattered coarse calcification, middle layer, and lower layer were independent influencing factors leading to undiagnosed puncture cytology. Among the 216 nodules in 200 patients, 168 were pathologically diagnosed as malignant nodules (malignant group), and 48 nodules were diagnosed as benign nodules (benign group). According to the joint scoring strategy, the distribution of comprehensive scores changes significantly at 5-6 scores while in malignant nodules, the distribution of comprehensive scores changes significantly at 6-7 scores. ROC curve analysis showed that the diagnostic value was the highest when '6 scores' was used as the critical point for diagnosis [area under curve (AUC) =0.893, P<0.05].
CONCLUSIONS: The combined scoring strategy of CEUS and UE was an effective method to diagnose TI-RADS4 nodules could not be diagnosed by UG-FNAC. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS); thyroid nodules; ultrasound elastography (UE); ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (UG-FNAC)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34733722      PMCID: PMC8514318          DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  27 in total

1.  Factors affecting inadequate sampling of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Seon Hyeong Choi; Kyung Hwa Han; Jung Hyun Yoon; Hee Jung Moon; Eun Ju Son; Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.478

2.  Nondiagnostic cytological results on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: Does the thyroid nodule depth matter?

Authors:  Jia-Jing Xia; Meng-Sen Li; Li Zheng; You-Zhen Shi
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Luying Gao; Xuehua Xi; Yuxin Jiang; Xiao Yang; Ying Wang; Shenling Zhu; Xingjian Lai; Xiaoyan Zhang; Ruina Zhao; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Evolving Understanding of the Epidemiology of Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn Dacey Seib; Julie Ann Sosa
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  Reporting thyroid FNA before and after implementation of the Bethesda system-one institution's experience.

Authors:  Kathriel J Brister; Remmi S Singh; Helen H Wang
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 6.  Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): A User's Guide.

Authors:  Franklin N Tessler; William D Middleton; Edward G Grant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Suggested amendment of TI-RADS classification of thyroid nodules by shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Jin-Ru Yang; Yan Song; Shan-Shan Xue; Li-Tao Ruan
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  The role of multimodal ultrasonic flow imaging in Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) 4 nodules.

Authors:  Libo Zhang; Junyi Gu; Yuxin Zhao; Min Zhu; Jing Wei; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

Review 9.  Thyroid nodules and cancer management guidelines: comparisons and controversies.

Authors:  Fadi Nabhan; Matthew D Ringel
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.678

10.  Impact of ultrasound angiography combined with fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Xiao-Gang Bai; Zhe Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.