Literature DB >> 34733386

Use of medicinal plants by cancer patients at the National Institute of Oncology, Rabat: a cross-sectional survey.

Nadia El Orfi1, Saber Boutayeb2, Bouchra Haddou Rahou3, Ahlam Aitouma1, Amine Souadka4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: the use of medicinal plants has increased significantly in recent years. According to the World Health Organization, 80% of the world's population uses medicinal plants to treat themselves. Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of medicinal plant use by cancer patients, list the different plants and identify their adverse effects cited by users and their reported efficacy.
METHODS: this study was realised among 100 patients via a questionnaire with 14-items. Socio-economic and clinical characteristics have been analysed. The bivariate and multivariate analyses have been used to demonstrate the association between the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants, the duration of the disease and the use of medicinal plants.
RESULTS: 45% of participants used medicinal plants. The most commonly reported reason for using medicinal plants was cancer cure (22%). During this study, 32 plants were identified. The Honey was the most commonly used (25%), thyme was also consumed at 15%, fenugreek at 13% and garlic at 7%. According to the multivariate analysis, the residence is predictor of medicinal plant use, urban residents used medicinal plants more than rural patients with an OR: 3,098, IC, 95%: [1,183-8,113] and P = 0,021. Fifty patients reported the moderate efficacy of the use of medicinal plants, and 20% described some side effects such as abdominal pain in 34%.
CONCLUSION: in order to avoid any interaction with oncological drugs and to improve their effectiveness, a great importance must be given to information, education and awareness sessions. Copyright: Nadia El Orfi et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; adverse reactions; medicinal plants; reported efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34733386      PMCID: PMC8531965          DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.18.24992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pan Afr Med J


Introduction

In recent years, medicinal plants (MP) as well as honey as a plant derivative processed by bees [1] and obtained from the combination of the plant and animal world [2] have been accorded great importance as a natural remedy for the treatment of diseases at the international level. According to the World Health Organization, 80% of the world's population uses medicinal plants for their health. In China, herbal preparations represent 30 and 50% and in Germany, 90% of people take a natural remedy [3]. Morocco is known throughout the world for its wealth of aromatic and medicinal plants and its diversity. It has 4200 species of which 800 are endemic and nearly 500 species are used in the medicinal and/or aromatic field [4]. According to a national study, 77.8% of patients consulting a herbalist use MP to treat different diseases [5]. Consumer patients perceive plants as natural and safe products [6], however, some scientific research has shown that plants can contain toxic substances mainly mercury, lead, cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, zinc and arsenic [7]. Cancer patients are no exception to this rule. At the national level, various studies have shown MP utilization rates in this category of patients and have revealed a rate by 36% of patients [7, 8]. In Turkey, the prevalence of MP use is 68.2% [9]. In China, the utilization rate was 53%. [10]. These natural remedies used may interact with conventional agents and their association with concomitant treatment may have an impact on its efficacy and safety [11]. They can also affect the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity of drugs [12]. The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of MP use in cancer patients followed at the National Institute of Oncology (NIO), and to list the MP used, the information that participants had about the MPs consumed, their adverse reactions and their reported efficacy.

Methods

Design and setting of the study: this is a cross-sectional study conducted at the National Institute of Oncology, particularly in hospitalization services for digestive surgery, gynecomammary surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy and external services such as outpatient clinics, biological analysis laboratories and day hospitals. This study consists of estimating the prevalence of MP use, listing the different MP used by participants and identifying the adverse effects cited by users and the effectiveness expressed. The duration of this study was one month from March 15th to April 13th 2018. Participants: the sample for the present study used a national average prevalence of 40% calculated from results obtained from national surveys of MP use among cancer patients. The confidence interval was 95% and the margin of error was 10%. The study sample size was 92. A supplement has been made to avoid losses. The study involved both inpatient and outpatient. A total of 100 patients of different sexes, their selection was random. All patients over 18 years of age; undergoing treatment for digestive, gynecologic or other cancers, present during the study period and willing to complete the questionnaire, were included. Exclusion criteria were patients who refused to participate in the study, patients with WHO>3 or hospitalised in palliative care and patients with a pathology that did not allow them to speak.

Materials

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research of the Mohamed V Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy in Rabat N° 27/18. It is a questionnaire study administered face to face by the investigators participating in the study, it is in French language. The questionnaire includes socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients as well as 14 items relating to the prevalence of MP, their quantity, the reason for use of MP, the person advising this use, the part consumed, their preparation mode, the frequency and duration of use, information on the MP used, their adverse reactions and their effectiveness. It includes closed-ended questions (gender, age, origin, socioeconomic status, occupation, cultural level, type of illness, duration of illness and location of illness) and open-ended questions. The patients who answered were classified according to their medical coverage into low socio-economic level with medical assistance regime, those with medical coverage insurance and paid patients. For the residence, patients were classified according to an urban environment (from cities) and a rural environment (from rural areas). The disease stage has been classified into metastasic and non-metastasic stages. The plants surveyed were classified according to their type (condiment, food, aromatic plants, medicinal plants and seeds). We have listed honey among the medicinal plants since it is transformed from nectar by bees and therefore it is considered a product derived from plants. The Codex Alimentarius (FAO 2001) as well as Council Directive 2001/110/EC of 20th December 2001 of the European Union define it as a natural sweet substance produced by bees from plant nectar or from secretions from living plant parts or from excretions of foraging insects left on living plant parts. The duration of the illness was calculated before hospital admission. For age, it has been classified into three bands, from 20 to 40 years old, from 40 to 60 years old and over 60 years old. The variables studied were calculated in terms of frequency and percent. Statistical analysis: the statistical analysis of the data was performed by the SPSS software version 23. Qualitative variables were expressed in frequency. A Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare MP users and non-users. Univariate analysis was done to determine the association between socio-demographic, clinical parameters and MP use. Multivariate analysis was used to determine factors predictive of MP use. P value <0.05 was used whether the association is statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics: during our study, 100 patients were surveyed for a 100% response rate. According to the results, women represented 80% of the study population and married people 56%. Patients aged 40 to 60 years were the most represented group (64%). 89% of the participants had no profession. Regarding medical coverage, 77% of the participants were the patients with medical assistance regime, 75% of the patients came from urban areas and 53% of the patients were illiterate. Gynecologic and breast cancers were the most important with 54%. The most commonly reported antecedents were high blood pressure (13%). 40% of the respondents were on chemotherapy treatment at the time of the study. 66% of patients have non-metastatic cancer. Forty-six of the participants had a duration of illness of less than one year (Table 1).
Table 1

socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (n=100)

VariablesfrequencyPercent
Age (years old)
Less than 401415
40-606164
Over 602021
Gender
Female7780
Male1920
Marital status
Single2828
Married5757
Divorced1515
Profession
civil servant active66
Retired55
Without8989
Type of social security
Patients with medical assistance regime7577
Patients with coverage insurance2020
Paid33
Socio-economic level
Low level5252
Average level4848
Residence
Urban7171
Rural2929
Educational level
Illiterate4953
Primary school1415
Secondary school1820
University1112
Type of cancer
Gynecomammary4354
Digestive2025
ENT: oral cancer, esophagus, ear, neck, nose and thyroid710
Others911
Medical history
High blood pressure1341
Diabetes515
Others1444
current treatment
Chemotherapy4040
Surgery3838
Radiotherapy2222
Stage of the disease
Non-metastatic stage6666
Metastatic stage3434
Duration of the disease
less than 1 year4246
1 year to 5 years3538
More than 5 years old1516
socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (n=100) Use of medicinal plants: of the 100 participants, 45% used medicinal plants. The main reason for use was cancer treatment (22%). The use of MP increases during treatment (36%). Thirty Two percent of patients reported using MP less than one year. The use of a single plant was observed in 36% of the participants (Figure 1).
Figure 1

use of medicinal plant; result of the study of use of medicinal plants by cancer patients, Morocco, 2018

use of medicinal plant; result of the study of use of medicinal plants by cancer patients, Morocco, 2018 Medicinal plants used: during this study, 32 plants were identified belonging to different categories and showing the richness of the traditional Moroccan pharmacopoeia in cancer patients in the Rabat region and followed up at NIO. The most used of these plants were honey (29%), thyme (18%), fenugreek (15%), nigella seed (8%) and garlic (8%). The most commonly used part was seeds (29%), the amount consumed was an additional spoon at 61%, the way MP was prepared was infused (29%) and mixed with honey at 29%. About 50% of users consumed MP once a day (Table 2).
Table 2

type of MP, quantity, part used, preparation method and frequency of use

PlantsFrequencyPercentage
Type of MP used
Honey2529
Thyme1518
Fenugreek1315
Garlic78
nigella seed78
Turmeric34
White marrube (meriwet)34
Mint pouliot (flio)22
Aquilariamalaccensis (aghriss)22
Autres810
Part used
Root1423
Sheet of paper1423
Seed1829
Stem47
Mixing1118
Quantity used
Handle1023
Spoon2761
Glass716
Preparation method
Infusion1729
with tea814
Powdered47
with the power supply1221
with honey1729
Frequency of use
Once a day2250
2 times/day49
1 time/week37
2 times/week1023
Once a month49
2 times/month12
type of MP, quantity, part used, preparation method and frequency of use Information on PM, person advising on the use and acquisition of MP: about 58% of the users among the 100 participants had information about the MPs consumed, of which 31% stated that they are useful for strengthening immunity. The use of these natural remedies was mainly requested by the participant's entourage (66%). For the supply of MP, 80% of 100 respondents did not change their supplier (Table 3).
Table 3

information on PM, person advising on the use and acquisition of MP

VariablesfrequencyPercent
Information
Yes2658
No1942
Beneficial and effective for health724
Promotes the healing of cancer414
Strengthens immunity931
Calms and soothes pain including gastric pain27
Cleans the neck and purifies the Blood27
Treats anemia, fatigue and Flu310
Other27
Person advising MPs
Colleague716
Yourself25
Physician12
entourage2966
internet49
Media12
Change of supplier
Yes3680
No920
Purpose of supplier change
search for quality233
Digging in the wilderness233
most convenient117
Product availability117
information on PM, person advising on the use and acquisition of MP Effectiveness and adverse effects of MP: certainly, 50% of 100 participants found MPs moderately effective and 20% of participants reported adverse effects, including abdominal pain (34%) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

effectiveness and reported adverse effects. Result of the study of use of medicinal plants by cancer patients, Morocco, 2018

effectiveness and reported adverse effects. Result of the study of use of medicinal plants by cancer patients, Morocco, 2018 Predictors of MP use: a univariate analysis was performed to analyze the association between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and MP use. Results showed a very significant association with the residence (P=0.02), participants from the urban environment were the most frequent users of MP. A multivariate analysis showed that the independent factor predicting the use of MP is the residence (OR: 3,098, IC 95%: [1,183-8,113], P=0,021) (Table 4).
Table 4

comparison of variables between MP users and non-users

VariableUser (n=45)Non-user (n=55)UnivariatMultivariate
n % N % P OR IC P
Gender
Female32714684
Male13299160.13
The residence
Urban378234620.023,098 [1,183-8,113] 0,021
Rural8182138
Profession
Without388451930.1
Active51112
Retired2535
Socio-economic level
Low level286224440.1
Average level17383156
Educational level
Illiterate22493156
Primary school8187130.5
Secondary school1124916
University49815
Stage of the disease
Non metastatic stage296437670.8
Metastatic stage16361833
Family situation
Single102218330.1
Married25563258
Divorced102259
Medical coverage
Patients with medical assistance regim102210180.8
Patients with coverage insurance34764378
Paid122
Diagnosis
Gynecological-cancer2351314
Mammary
Digestive cancer12271356
ENT: oral cancer, esophagus, ear, neck, nose and thyroid7153240.2
Others37815
Age
< than 40 years old*51110180.6
40-60 years old31693360
> than 60 years old9201222
Duration of disease
Loss than 1 year184028510.6
1-5 years19421835
More than 5 years818814
comparison of variables between MP users and non-users

Discussion

Our study revealed the use of MP by patients during conventional treatment. The rate of their use was higher (45%) than that shown in other studies [7]. Despite advice and prescriptions from oncologists reporting a ban on taking MP, the rate of use remains increasing, this can be explained by the recent development of media that encouraged the use of MP to treat chronic diseases as well as the influence of family and friends, this has been confirmed by other studies in different countries [9, 10, 13]. A variety of plants (32 plants) were identified during our study belonging to different classes. Some studies have cited and shown the use of a different package of MP by patients as remedies, supplements and functional foods [7, 14, 15]. In our study honey is the most commonly used product, as are the results of was the most commonly used, similar to the results of a previous study [8]. Thyme, fenugreek and garlic were also consumed by patients; their use has been demonstrated in other similar studies [16-18]. The results of our study showed that MP is used not only in seeds, which was the most consumed part, but also in leaves and roots, which is perfectly in line with another study that showed that leaves, fruits and seeds are the essential ingredient in the preparations used [19]. Our study showed that the environment of origin is a predictive factor in the use of MP by cancer patients. Indeed, participants from urban areas were more likely to use natural remedies to treat themselves, this may be due to the availability and accessibility of MP. Participants reported adverse events (AEs) (20%) related to the use of MP, this rate was somewhat similar to that reported in other previous studies [7, 10]. These AEs can be explained by the lack of knowledge of the MPs regarding the dosage, the preparation method and the part used as well as the random use since the Moroccan market is rich in MP and their sale is not subject to any control or regulation. However, this rate may be low estimated due to the non-medicalised surveillance of the MP intake. The results of our study showed that patients (50%) found MPs moderately effective, as demonstrated in another previous study [15]. Limits: the limitations of this study may be related to the under-reporting of patients regarding the use of MP and the low number of participants, and the potential underreporting of side effects due to uncontrolled MP use and non-medicalized surveillance.

Conclusion

The use of MPs in Morocco, especially in the Rabat region, is very much in demand by cancer patients. Despite the advice provided by oncologists, the use of these remedies for treatment remains high. Our study counted 32 species consumed by these patients. The residence is a predictor of the use of MPs, patients living in urban areas are more likely to consume MPs. Honey, thyme, fenugreek, black cumin seed and garlic are the most commonly used herbs. Most patients believe in the efficacy of MP without considering side effects or interactions with conventional treatment. Pending further studies to justify this efficacy, adverse effects and interactions. It is necessary to be vigilant with patients using these plants during treatment and to adopt strategies to sensitize and educate the patient and his entourage.

What is known about this topic

Cancer patients under conventional treatment should not consume herbal medicines; Herbal medicines consumed may cause interactions with conventional treatment and result in side effects; The medicinal plants consumed can influence the effectiveness of the treatment and delay healing.

What this study adds

Patients have reported side effects from herbal medicines, particularly abdominal pain; The rate of consuming medicinal plants in study patients is high at 45%; 32 plants were identified in our study.
  13 in total

1.  [Complementary medicine in cancer patients under treatment in Marrakech, Morocco: a prospective study].

Authors:  I Tazi; H Nafil; L Mahmal; M Harif; M Khouchani; Z Saadi; R Belbaraka; A Elomrani; A Tahri
Journal:  Bull Soc Pathol Exot       Date:  2013-09-20

2.  Adverse interactions between herbal and dietary substances and prescription medications: a clinical survey.

Authors:  Thomas M Bush; Keith S Rayburn; Sandra W Holloway; Deanna S Sanchez-Yamamoto; Blaine L Allen; Tiffany Lam; Brian K So; De H Tran; Elizabeth R Greyber; Sophia Kantor; Larry W Roth
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.305

Review 3.  Herbal hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Catherine Stedman
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.115

4.  The prevalence of usage of herbal medicines among cancer patients.

Authors:  S Tuna; O Dizdar; M Calis
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Use of chinese herb medicine in cancer patients: a survey in southwestern china.

Authors:  Tai-Guo Liu; Shao-Quan Xiong; Yan Yan; Hong Zhu; Cheng Yi
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  The use of herbal medicines by people with cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  S Damery; C Gratus; R Grieve; S Warmington; J Jones; P Routledge; S Greenfield; G Dowswell; J Sherriff; S Wilson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Herbal remedies and functional foods used by cancer patients attending specialty oncology clinics in Trinidad.

Authors:  Yuri N Clement; Varune Mahase; Annelise Jagroop; Kelly Kissoon; Aarti Maharaj; Prashant Mathura; Chrys Mc Quan; Divya Ramadhin; Cherrista Mohammed
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.659

8.  Complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with cancer in Mongolia: a National hospital survey.

Authors:  Buyadaa Oyunchimeg; Jung Hye Hwang; Mansoor Ahmed; Soojeung Choi; Dongwoon Han
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  [Survey of toxicological aspects of herbal medicine used by a herbalist in Fes, Morocco].

Authors:  Ali Amine Zeggwagh; Younes Lahlou; Yassir Bousliman
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2013-03-30

10.  Ethnopharmacological survey of herbal remedies used for treatment of various types of cancer and their methods of preparations in the West Bank-Palestine.

Authors:  Nidal Amin Jaradat; Rowa Al-Ramahi; Abdel Naser Zaid; Ola Ibrahim Ayesh; Ahmad Mustafa Eid
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.