| Literature DB >> 34733345 |
Siliang Song1, Wen Li1, Wenjuan Liang1, Xiu Tian2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine decoction combined with recombinant human interferon α2b in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34733345 PMCID: PMC8560232 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8106974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of general information between the control group and the treatment group (n = 34).
| Features | Control group | Treatment group | |
|
| |||
| Age | 58.97 ± 12.33 | 60.23 ± 13.79 | |
| Male/female | 19/15 | 20/14 | |
| Karnofsky score | 75.37 ± 7.324 | 73.674 ± 3.086 | |
|
| |||
| Tumor location | Left | 17 | 18 |
| Right | 17 | 16 | |
|
| |||
| Robson tumor stage | I | 11 | 11 |
| II | 15 | 16 | |
| III | 8 | 7 | |
|
| |||
| Case classification | Clear cell carcinoma | 17 | 16 |
| Granular cell carcinoma | 10 | 10 | |
| Papillary RCC | 7 | 8 | |
MRI manifestations of patients in the control group (n = 34).
| Tine | Enhanced scan | ||
| Strengthened | No reinforcement | ||
| Ring reinforcement | Irregularities or enhancement of marginal nodules | ||
|
| |||
| Before treatment | 19 | 5 | 10 |
| After treatment | 14 | 3 | 17 |
MRI manifestations of patients in the treatment group (n = 34).
| Tine | Enhanced scan | ||
| Strengthened | No reinforcement | ||
| Ring reinforcement | Irregularities or enhancement of marginal nodules | ||
|
| |||
| Before treatment | 20 | 5 | 9 |
| After treatment | 12 | 2 | 20 |
Comparison of short-term objective curative effect between the two groups of patients (case (%)).
| Group | CR | PR | SD | PD | CR + PR | CR + PR + SD |
|
| ||||||
| Treatment group | 2 (5.88%) | 6 (17.65%) | 11 (32.35%) | 15 (22.12%) | 8 (23.53%) | 19 (55.88%) |
| Control group | 1 (2.94%) | 4 (11.76%) | 9 (26.47%) | 20 (58.82%) | 5 (14.71%) | 14 (41.18%) |
Comparison of common symptoms' improvement between the two groups of patients after treatment.
| Common symptoms | Control group | Treatment group | ||
| Before | After | Before | After | |
|
| ||||
| Hematuria | 1.54 ± 0.87 | 1.06 ± 0.89 | 1.58 ± 0.91 | 0.66 ± 0.51 |
| Languid | 1.63 ± 0.75 | 1.45 ± 0.63 | 1.64 ± 0.69 | 0.89 ± 0.33 |
| Dry mouth and throat | 1.86 ± 1.02 | 0.86 ± 0.42 | 1.98 ± 0.99 | 0.73 ± 0.72 |
| Lumbar muscle soreness | 1.54 ± 1.04 | 1.38 ± 0.92 | 1.59 ± 1.17 | 0.88 ± 0.93 |
| Five upset fever | 1.27 ± 0.85 | 1.03 ± 0.74 | 1.31 ± 0.89 | 0.59 ± 0.74 |
| Abnormal stool | 1.08 ± 0.43 | 1.36 ± 0.64 | 0.98 ± 0.39 | 1.64 ± 0.77 |
| Poor appetite | 1.61 ± 0.65 | 1.35 ± 0.21 | 1.63 ± 0.48 | 0.97 ± 0.37 |
P < 0.05 compared with this group before treatment; #P < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Figure 1Comparison of Karnofsky scores between two groups of patients before and after treatment (x ± s). P < 0.05 (compared with before treatment); #P < 0.05 (compared with the control group).
Figure 2Comparison of peripheral blood leukocytes and counts between the two groups. P < 0.05 (compared with before treatment); #P < 0.05 (compared with the control group).
Figure 3Comparison of neutrophil counts in peripheral blood between the two groups. P < 0.05 (compared with before treatment); #P < 0.05 (compared with the control group).
Changes of NSE, FERR, β2-MG, and CER levels of patients before and after treatment.
| Indicator | Control group | Treatment group | ||
| Before | After | Before | After | |
|
| ||||
| NSE | 19.38 ± 2.77 | 14.68 ± 2.53 | 19.29 ± 3.01 | 10.55 ± 2.13 |
| FERR | 331.97 ± 86.03 | 268.43 ± 75.96 | 329.62 ± 90.31 | 265.27 ± 77.83 |
|
| 2714.85 ± 501.33 | 2035.17 ± 478.88 | 2702.31 ± 498.35 | 2006.64 ± 485.41 |
| CER | 3.10 ± 1.57 | 2.93 ± 2.01 | 3.08 ± 1.73 | 2.82 ± 1.78 |
Compared with before treatment, P < 0.05; #compared with the control group, P < 0.05.
Figure 4The changes of patients' CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8+ before and after treatment. P < 0.05 (compared with before treatment); #P < 0.05 (compared with the control group).
Comparison of EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores before and after treatment between the two groups.
| Item | Control group | Treatment group | ||
| Before | After | Before | After | |
|
| ||||
| Functional subscale | ||||
| Physical function | 45.75 ± 16.38 | 55.69 ± 18.35 | 45.77 ± 17.93 | 60.34 ± 19.81 |
| Role function | 59.43 ± 18.23 | 72.36 ± 20.19 | 60.44 ± 20.37 | 82.68 ± 21.52 |
| Cognitive function | 58.03 ± 18.95 | 62.37 ± 20.06 | 57.91 ± 16.99 | 63.71 ± 18.82 |
| Emotional function | 51.36 ± 14.38 | 60.34 ± 19.97 | 54.39 ± 16.37 | 71.38 ± 21.79 |
| Social function | 52.67 ± 16.57 | 64.77 ± 16.38 | 51.97 ± 14.39 | 67.03 ± 16.29 |
|
| ||||
| Symptom subscale | ||||
| Weak | 44.07 ± 23.65 | 41.97 ± 19.06 | 43.98 ± 22.44 | 31.43 ± 18.73 |
| Pain | 25.34 ± 19.25 | 32.76 ± 25.34 | 25.57 ± 21.79 | 29.14 ± 20.33 |
| Nausea and vomiting | 15.69 ± 12.12 | 47.38 ± 16.42 | 17.03 ± 5.63 | 32.58 ± 13.46 |
| Breathing difficulties | 38.23 ± 19.37 | 55.83 ± 28.71 | 38.04 ± 18.23 | 45.57 ± 23.31 |
| Agrypnia | 42.76 ± 21.83 | 48.21 ± 19.34 | 42.42 ± 21.39 | 24.39 ± 14.23# |
| Appetite loss | 27.86 ± 19.34 | 57.14 ± 34.25 | 28.67 ± 20.47 | 40.26 ± 24.37 |
| Constipation | 37.45 ± 18.67 | 38.14 ± 20.00 | 36.71 ± 19.73 | 42.39 ± 21.37 |
| Diarrhea | 34.43 ± 22.37 | 59.37 ± 21.23 | 35.58 ± 19.19 | 54.38 ± 23.33 |
| General health | 55.27 ± 16.67 | 56.89 ± 20.41 | 55.83 ± 19.27 | 68.79 ± 20.43# |
P < 0.05, compared with this group before treatment; #P < 0.05, compared with the control group.
Figure 5The graphical abstract.