Literature DB >> 34732969

A Preliminary Investigation of ERP Components of Attentional Bias in Anxious Adults using Temporospatial Principal Component Analysis.

Resh S Gupta1, Autumn Kujawa2, David R Vago1,3.   

Abstract

Threat-related attention bias is thought to contribute to the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Dot-probe studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) have indicated that several early ERP components are modulated by threatening and emotional stimuli in anxious populations, suggesting enhanced allocation of attention to threat and emotion at earlier stages of processing. However, ERP components selected for examination and analysis in these studies vary widely and remain inconsistent. The present study used temporospatial principal component analysis (PCA) to systematically identify ERP components elicited to face pair cues and probes in a dot-probe task in anxious adults. Cue-locked components sensitive to emotion included an early occipital C1 component enhanced for happy versus angry face pair cues and an early parieto-occipital P1 component enhanced for happy versus angry face pair cues. Probe-locked components sensitive to congruency included a parieto-occipital P2 component enhanced for incongruent probes (probes replacing neutral faces) versus congruent probes (probes replacing emotional faces). Split-half correlations indicated that the mean value around the PCA-derived peaks were reliably measured in the ERP waveforms. These results highlight promising neurophysiological markers for attentional bias research that can be extended to designs comparing anxious and healthy comparison groups. Results from a secondary exploratory PCA analysis investigating the effects of emotional face position and analyses on behavioral reaction time data are also presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anxiety; attentional bias; dot-probe; principal component analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34732969      PMCID: PMC8559726          DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0269-8803            Impact factor:   1.229


  50 in total

1.  Event-related potential studies of attention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Bram Van Bockstaele; Bruno Verschuere; Helen Tibboel; Jan De Houwer; Geert Crombez; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: a tutorial.

Authors:  Joseph Dien
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task.

Authors:  Emily S Kappenman; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

6.  Allocation of attention according to informativeness in visual recognition.

Authors:  D Navon; B Margalit
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-08

7.  Enhanced neural reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety.

Authors:  Sharon Eldar; Roni Yankelevitch; Dominique Lamy; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Face to face: visual scanpath evidence for abnormal processing of facial expressions in social phobia.

Authors:  Kaye Horley; Leanne M Williams; Craig Gonsalvez; Evian Gordon
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Trait anxiety modulates the electrophysiological indices of rapid spatial orienting towards angry faces.

Authors:  Elaine Fox; Nazanin Derakshan; Leor Shoker
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.

Authors:  Emily S Kappenman; Jaclyn L Farrens; Steven J Luck; Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory and cross-modal attentional bias toward positive natural sounds: Behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Yanmei Wang; Zhenwei Tang; Xiaoxuan Zhang; Libing Yang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.