Literature DB >> 34732595

Work related well-being is associated with individual subjective well-being.

Tapas K Ray1,2,3.   

Abstract

This study utilizes Gallup-ShareCare Well-being Index data to investigate the association between work-related well-being, i.e., job satisfaction, and overall subjective well-being among US workers. Subjective well-being is measured by i) daily positive and negative emotional experiences - happiness, smiles, enjoyment, sadness, anger, worry, and stress (hedonic well-being); and ii) current and future life evaluation (evaluative well-being). The study finds significant positive relationships between job satisfaction and subjective well-being both in terms of higher odds of positive hedonic experiences and increased life evaluation scores after controlling for covariates and other nonwork-related contributors to well-being. Job satisfaction accounted for a 14% increase in current and an 8% increase in future life evaluation scores. The results emphasize that not only the income generated by work but the quality of work is also important for worker well-being. In fact, those without a job had higher well-being than those workers who are dissatisfied at work. This is probably the first study that relates work-related well-being to overall well-being, using a nationally representative sample of US workers. Further, this is one of the few instances where the subjective measure of well-being is used in the occupational safety and health literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluative; Gallup; Hedonic; Job satisfaction; Uunemployment; Well-being; Work

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34732595      PMCID: PMC9171114          DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ind Health        ISSN: 0019-8366            Impact factor:   2.707


  9 in total

1.  High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman; Angus Deaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A potential new data source for assessing the impacts of health reform: Evaluating the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index.

Authors:  Laura Skopec; Thomas Musco; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-13

3.  Long hours of work in the U.S.: associations with demographic and organizational characteristics, psychosocial working conditions, and health.

Authors:  James W Grosch; Claire C Caruso; Roger R Rosa; Steven L Sauter
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Discriminant validity of well-being measures.

Authors:  R E Lucas; E Diener; E Suh
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-09

5.  Association of Job Satisfaction and Security With Subjective Health and Well-Being in Korean Employees.

Authors:  Jungsun Park; Boyoung Han; Yangho Kim
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 6.  A reciprocal interplay between psychosocial job stressors and worker well-being? A systematic review of the "reversed" effect.

Authors:  Kenneth Tang
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Evaluative and hedonic wellbeing among those with and without children at home.

Authors:  Angus Deaton; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Expanding the Paradigm of Occupational Safety and Health: A New Framework for Worker Well-Being.

Authors:  Ramya Chari; Chia-Chia Chang; Steven L Sauter; Elizabeth L Petrun Sayers; Jennifer L Cerully; Paul Schulte; Anita L Schill; Lori Uscher-Pines
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.162

9.  Experiences of unemployment and well-being after job loss during economic recession: Results of a qualitative study in east central Sweden.

Authors:  Anne-Sofie Hiswåls; Anneli Marttila; Emelie Mälstam; Gloria Macassa
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2017-12-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.