Literature DB >> 34731856

Real-World Single-Center Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Entecavir, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.

Sara Jeong1, Hyun Phil Shin1, Ha Il Kim1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major cause of chronic liver diseases and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and entecavir (ETV) are recommended as primary treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ETV, TDF, and TAF in a real-world clinical setting.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 363 CHB patients who were treated with ETV (n = 163), TDF (n = 154), or TAF (n = 46) from July 2007 to September 2019 were enrolled.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 51 years and 66.4% of patients were male. Median duration of treatment with ETV, TDF, or TAF was 49.0 months (interquartile range, 27.0-74.0 months). In terms of safety, cholesterol was mildly increased in the ETV and TAF groups and significantly lowered in the TDF group than baseline (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in liver cirrhosis-related complications among the 3 groups at 48 weeks (p = 0.235). Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, complete virological response, and alanine aminotransferase normalization at 48 weeks as measures of treatment efficacy were not significantly different among the 3 groups (p = 0.142, 0.538, and 0.520, respectively). There was also no significant difference in cumulative incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between the ETV and TDF groups (p = 0.894).
CONCLUSIONS: ETV, TDF, and TAF were safe antiviral agents and showed similar antiviral effect for CHB at 48 weeks. Cirrhosis-related complications and annual HCC incidence rates did not differ significantly between the ETV and TDF groups over the 48 week follow-up period.
© 2021 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic hepatitis B; Entecavir; Safety; Tenofovir; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34731856      PMCID: PMC9153351          DOI: 10.1159/000519440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intervirology        ISSN: 0300-5526            Impact factor:   2.294


  46 in total

1.  Renal tubular dysfunction during long-term adefovir or tenofovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  N Gara; X Zhao; M T Collins; W H Chong; D E Kleiner; T Jake Liang; M G Ghany; J H Hoofnagle
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Implications of efficient hepatic delivery by tenofovir alafenamide (GS-7340) for hepatitis B virus therapy.

Authors:  Eisuke Murakami; Ting Wang; Yeojin Park; Jia Hao; Eve-Irene Lepist; Darius Babusis; Adrian S Ray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Independent risk factors and predictive score for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Man-Fung Yuen; Yasuhito Tanaka; Daniel Yee-Tak Fong; James Fung; Danny Ka-Ho Wong; John Chi-Hang Yuen; David Yiu-Kuen But; Annie On-On Chan; Benjamin Chun-Yu Wong; Masashi Mizokami; Ching-Lung Lai
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Treated With Entecavir vs Tenofovir for Chronic Hepatitis B: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jonggi Choi; Hyo Jeong Kim; Jayoun Lee; Songhee Cho; Min Jung Ko; Young-Suk Lim
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 5.  Long-term safety and efficacy of nucleo(t)side analogue therapy in hepatitis B.

Authors:  Maria Buti; Mar Riveiro-Barciela; Rafael Esteban
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.828

6.  Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study.

Authors:  Patrick Marcellin; Edward Gane; Maria Buti; Nezam Afdhal; William Sievert; Ira M Jacobson; Mary Kay Washington; George Germanidis; John F Flaherty; Raul Aguilar Schall; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Kathryn M Kitrinos; G Mani Subramanian; John G McHutchison; E Jenny Heathcote
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Twenty-eight day safety, antiviral activity, and pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection.

Authors:  Kosh Agarwal; Scott K Fung; Tuan T Nguyen; Wendy Cheng; Eric Sicard; Stephen D Ryder; John F Flaherty; Eileen Lawson; Sally Zhao; G Mani Subramanian; John G McHutchison; Edward J Gane; Graham R Foster
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia induced by tenofovir in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Lourdes Mateo; Susana Holgado; Maria Luisa Mariñoso; Ricard Pérez-Andrés; Anna Bonjoch; Joan Romeu; Alejandro Olivé
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  No detectable resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate after 6 years of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Kathryn M Kitrinos; Amoreena Corsa; Yang Liu; John Flaherty; Andrea Snow-Lampart; Patrick Marcellin; Katyna Borroto-Esoda; Michael D Miller
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Treatment with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate worsens the lipid profile of HIV-infected patients versus treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, each coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine.

Authors:  Purificación Cid-Silva; Noelia Fernández-Bargiela; Luis Margusino-Framiñán; Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro; Álvaro Mena-De-Cea; Soledad López-Calvo; Pilar Vázquez-Rodríguez; Isabel Martín-Herranz; Enrique Míguez-Rey; Eva Poveda; Ángeles Castro-Iglesias
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.080

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.