Literature DB >> 34731554

Neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 Mu Variant by Convalescent and Vaccine Serum.

Keiya Uriu1, Izumi Kimura1, Kotaro Shirakawa2, Akifumi Takaori-Kondo2, Taka-Aki Nakada3, Atsushi Kaneda3, So Nakagawa4, Kei Sato5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34731554      PMCID: PMC8609602          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2114706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: During the current pandemic, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), has diversified considerably. As of September 2021, the World Health Organization had defined four variants of concern (alpha [B.1.1.7], beta [B.1.351], gamma [P.1], and delta [B.1.617.2 and AY]), as well as five variants of interest (eta [B.1.525], iota [B.1.526], kappa [B.1.617.1], lambda [C.37], and mu [B.1.621]).[1] Mu represents the most recently recognized variant of interest.[1] As of August 30, 2021, the mu variant had been detected in 39 countries (Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). The epicenter of mu transmission is Colombia, where the variant was first isolated on January 11, 2021 (Figure 1A and Table S2). There was a huge surge in Covid-19 cases in Colombia from March through July 2021. Although the gamma variant was dominant during the initial phase of the surge, the mu variant outnumbered all other variants in May, and it has driven the epidemic in Colombia since that time (Figure 1A).
Figure 1

SARS-CoV-2 in Colombia and Characterization of the Mu Variant.

Panel A shows new cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) from January through August 2021 in Colombia. The mu variant was first isolated on January 11, 2021, in Colombia (Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System accession number, EPI_ISL_1220045). The black line reflects the number of new weekly cases, and the colored bars indicate the percentage of each variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among the cases. The raw data are summarized in Table S2 in the Supplementary Appendix. Panels B and C show the results of virus neutralization assays. Neutralization assays were performed with the use of pseudoviruses harboring the SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins of the alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon, lambda, or mu variants or the B.1 lineage virus, which harbors the D614G mutation (parental virus). Serum samples were obtained from 13 persons who had recovered from Covid-19 (Panel B) and from 14 persons who had received the BNT162b2 vaccine (Panel C). The assay of each serum sample was performed in triplicate to determine the 50% neutralization titer. Each data point represents an individual sample (circles) and indicates the 50% neutralization titer obtained with each sample against the indicated pseudovirus. The heights of the bars and the numbers over the bars indicate the geometric mean titers, and the 𝙸 bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The numbers in parentheses indicate the average difference in neutralization resistance of the indicated variants as compared with that of the parental virus. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the limit of detection. The raw data and information regarding the convalescent donors (sex, age, severity of disease, and dates of testing and sampling) and vaccinated donors (sex, age, and dates of second vaccination and sampling) of serum samples are summarized in Tables S6 and S7 in the Supplementary Appendix.

Newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants need to be carefully monitored for potentially increased transmission rate, pathogenicity, and resistance to immune responses. The resistance of variants of concern and variants of interest to serum obtained from persons who have recovered from Covid-19 and persons who have been vaccinated can be attributed to a variety of mutations in the viral spike protein.[2] The majority of mu variants harbor the T95I and YY144-145TSN mutations in the N-terminal domain; the R346K, E484K, and N501Y mutations in the receptor-binding domain; and the D614G, P681H, and D950N mutations in other regions of the spike protein (Tables S3 and S4). Some of these mutations are commonly identified in variants of concern (Table S5). Of these mutations, E484K (shared by the beta and gamma variants) has shown the greatest reduction in sensitivity to antibodies induced by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.[3,4] To assess the sensitivity of the mu variant to antibodies induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection and by vaccination, we generated pseudoviruses harboring the spike protein of the mu variant or the spike protein of other variants of concern or variants of interest. Virus neutralization assays, performed with the use of serum samples obtained from 13 persons who had recovered from Covid-19 who were infected early in the pandemic (April through September 2020), showed that the mu variant was 10.6 times as resistant to neutralization as the B.1 lineage virus (parental virus), which bears the D614G mutation (Figure 1B). Assays performed with serum samples obtained from 14 persons who had received the BNT162b2 vaccine showed that the mu variant was 9.1 as resistant as the parental virus (Figure 1C). Although the beta variant (a variant of concern) was thought to be the most resistant variant to date,[3,4] the mu variant was 2.0 as resistant to neutralization by convalescent serum (Figure 1B) and 1.5 times as resistant to neutralization by vaccine serum as the beta variant (Figure 1C). Thus, the mu variant shows a pronounced resistance to antibodies elicited by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and by the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Because breakthrough infections are a major threat of newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants,[5] we suggest that further characterization and monitoring of this variant of interest is warranted.
  67 in total

1.  Neutralizing antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants in gestational age-matched mother-infant dyads after infection or vaccination.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsui; Lin Li; Mary Prahl; Arianna G Cassidy; Nida Ozarslan; Yarden Golan; Veronica J Gonzalez; Christine Y Lin; Unurzul Jigmeddagva; Megan A Chidboy; Mauricio Montano; Taha Y Taha; Mir M Khalid; Bharath Sreekumar; Jennifer M Hayashi; Pei-Yi Chen; G Renuka Kumar; Lakshmi Warrier; Alan Hb Wu; Dongli Song; Priya Jegatheesan; Daljeet S Rai; Balaji Govindaswami; Jordan Needens; Monica Rincon; Leslie Myatt; Ifeyinwa V Asiodu; Valerie J Flaherman; Yalda Afshar; Vanessa L Jacoby; Amy P Murtha; Joshua F Robinson; Melanie Ott; Warner C Greene; Stephanie L Gaw
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-06-22

2.  An antibody-escape estimator for mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain.

Authors:  Allison J Greaney; Tyler N Starr; Jesse D Bloom
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Effectiveness of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 COVID-19 mass vaccination in Colombia: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Angel Paternina-Caicedo; Mark Jit; Nelson Alvis-Guzmán; Juan Carlos Fernández; José Hernández; Justo Jesus Paz-Wilches; José Rojas-Suarez; Carmelo Dueñas-Castell; Nelson J Alvis-Zakzuk; Adrian D Smith; Fernando De La Hoz-Restrepo
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Am       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  SARS-CoV-2: phenotype, genotype, and characterization of different variants.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Saberiyan; Elham Karimi; Zahra Khademi; Parvaneh Movahhed; Amir Safi; Ameneh Mehri-Ghahfarrokhi
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 8.702

5.  The Efficiency of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in the Management of Critically Ill Patients Infected With COVID-19: A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chun Pan; Hui Chen; Jianfeng Xie; Yingzi Huang; Yi Yang; Bin Du; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Real-world clinical outcomes of treatment with casirivimab-imdevimab among patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 during the Delta variant pandemic.

Authors:  Yasuhito Suzuki; Yoko Shibata; Hiroyuki Minemura; Takefumi Nikaido; Yoshinori Tanino; Atsuro Fukuhara; Ryuzo Kanno; Hiroyuki Saito; Shuzo Suzuki; Taeko Ishii; Yayoi Inokoshi; Eiichiro Sando; Hirofumi Sakuma; Tatsuho Kobayashi; Hiroaki Kume; Masahiro Kamimoto; Hideko Aoki; Akira Takama; Takamichi Kamiyama; Masaru Nakayama; Kiyoshi Saito; Koichi Tanigawa; Masahiko Sato; Toshiyuki Kanbe; Norio Kanzaki; Teruhisa Azuma; Keiji Sakamoto; Yuichi Nakamura; Hiroshi Ohtani; Mitsuru Waragai; Shinsaku Maeda; Tokiya Ishida; Keishi Sugino; Yasuhiko Tsukada; Ryuki Yamada; Riko Sato; Takumi Onuma; Hikaru Tomita; Mikako Saito; Natsumi Watanabe; Mami Rikimaru; Takaya Kawamata; Takashi Umeda; Julia Morimoto; Ryuichi Togawa; Yuki Sato; Junpei Saito; Kenya Kanazawa; Ken Iseki
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 7.  Antibody-mediated neutralization of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Henning Gruell; Kanika Vanshylla; Timm Weber; Christopher O Barnes; Christoph Kreer; Florian Klein
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 43.474

Review 8.  Molecular characteristics, immune evasion, and impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Authors:  Cong Sun; Chu Xie; Guo-Long Bu; Lan-Yi Zhong; Mu-Sheng Zeng
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-06-28

9.  Humoral Response to BNT162b2 Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants Decays After Six Months.

Authors:  Tulio J Lopera; Mateo Chvatal-Medina; Lizdany Flórez-Álvarez; Maria I Zapata-Cardona; Natalia A Taborda; Maria T Rugeles; Juan C Hernandez
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 10.  Advances in Pathogenesis, Progression, Potential Targets and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies in SARS-CoV-2-Induced COVID-19.

Authors:  Hong Zhou; Wei-Jian Ni; Wei Huang; Zhen Wang; Ming Cai; Yan-Cai Sun
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 8.786

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.