Literature DB >> 34730181

Applying evidence-based intervention (EBI) mapping to identify the components and logic of colorectal cancer screening interventions.

Jacob Szeszulski1,2, Derek W Craig1, Timothy J Walker1, Maya Foster1, Patricia Dolan Mullen1, Maria E Fernandez1.   

Abstract

Implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) can help to increase colorectal cancer screening (CRCS). Potential users of CRCS EBIs are often unclear about the specific features, logic, and core elements of existing EBIs, making it challenging to use or adapt them. We used EBI Mapping, a systematic process developed from Intervention Mapping that identifies an EBI's components and logic, to characterize existing CRCS EBIs from the National Cancer Institute's Evidence-Based Cancer Control Programs website. The resulting information can facilitate intervention adoption, adaptation, and/or implementation. Two trained coders independently coded intervention materials to describe intervention components and logic (n = 20). We display CRCS EBI components (potential mechanism of change) using evidence tables and heat maps. All EBIs addressed completion of at least one CRCS behavior (stool-based test, n = 9; stool-based test or another CRCS test, n = 8; colonoscopy, n = 3; colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, n = 1). The psychosocial determinants most frequently addressed by these interventions were knowledge (n = 19), attitudes (n = 17), risk perception/perceived susceptibility (n = 16), skills (n = 15), and overcoming barriers (n = 15). Multi-level EBIs (n = 9) attempted to change an average of 2.1 ± 1.1 conditions in the patients' environment (e.g., accessibility of CRCS); only four EBIs used environmental change agents (e.g., providers, nurses). From the heat maps of EBIs, we describe common theoretical change methods' (e.g., facilitation) used for addressing determinants (e.g., overcoming barriers). EBI Mapping can help users identify important components of a CRCS EBI's logic; these proposed mechanisms of action can inform adoption, adaptation, and implementation in new settings, and facilitate scale up of EBIs. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Colorectal; Implementation; Intervention Mapping; Program planning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34730181      PMCID: PMC8848996          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  Can language-concordant prevention care managers improve cancer screening rates?

Authors:  Michael L Beach; Ann Barry Flood; Christina M Robinson; Andrea N Cassells; Jonathan N Tobin; Mary Ann Greene; Allen J Dietrich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health.

Authors:  Borsika A Rabin; Ross C Brownson; Debra Haire-Joshu; Matthew W Kreuter; Nancy L Weaver
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

3.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; C Y Wang; Kathryn Horner; Sheryl Catz; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon; David Carrell; Jessica Chubak; Cynthia Ko; Sharon Laing; Andy Bogart
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Colorectal cancer screening: The costs and benefits of getting to 80% in every community.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Richard T Meenan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Allen J Dietrich; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Christina M Robinson; Mary Ann Greene; Carol Hill Sox; Michael L Beach; Katherine N DuHamel; Richard G Younge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Colorectal cancer screening in the United States: Trends from 2008 to 2015 and variation by health insurance coverage.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Robin A Cohen; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Susan A Sabatino; K Robin Yabroff; Stacey Fedewa; Richard Lee; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cheryl Altice; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Christian Stock; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-04-09

9.  Public health impact of achieving 80% colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; S Luuk Goede; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley; Ahmedin Jemal; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Intervention Mapping to Adapt Evidence-Based Interventions for Use in Practice: Increasing Mammography among African American Women.

Authors:  Linda Highfield; Marieke A Hartman; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Serena A Rodriguez; Maria E Fernandez; L Kay Bartholomew
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence-Based Intervention (EBI) Mapping: a systematic approach to understanding the components and logic of EBIs.

Authors:  Patricia Dolan Mullen; Maria E Fernández; Timothy J Walker; Maya Foster; Jacob Szeszulski; Derek W Craig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.