| Literature DB >> 34729961 |
Rachel Shoemaker1, Jayoung Kim1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
The urinary tract likely plays a role in the development of various urinary diseases due to the recently recognized notion that urine is not sterile. In this mini review, we summarize the current literature regarding the urinary microbiome and mycobiome and its relationship to various urinary diseases. It has been recently discovered that the healthy urinary tract contains a host of microorganisms, creating a urinary microbiome. The relative abundance and type of bacteria varies, but generally, deviations in the standard microbiome are observed in individuals with urologic diseases, such as bladder cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, urgency urinary incontinence, overactive bladder syndrome, interstitial cystitis, bladder pain syndrome, and urinary tract infections. However, whether this change is causative, or correlative has yet to be determined. In summary, the urinary tract hosts a complex microbiome. Changes in this microbiome may be indicative of urologic diseases and can be tracked to predict, prevent, and treat them in individuals. However, current analytical and sampling collection methods may present limitations to the development in the understanding of the urinary microbiome and its relationship with various urinary diseases. Further research on the differences between healthy and diseased microbiomes, the long-term effects of antibiotic treatments on the urobiome, and the effect of the urinary mycobiome on general health will be important in developing a comprehensive understanding of the urinary microbiome and its relationship to the human body. © The Korean Urological Association, 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Microbiome; Mycobiome; Urology
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34729961 PMCID: PMC8566783 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Investig Clin Urol ISSN: 2466-0493
Bacterial prevalence in the urinary microbiome of a healthy individual
| Genusa | Primary cohortb | Prevalencec | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Rare | [ | |
|
| Rare | [ | |
|
| Males | Common | [ |
|
| Frequent | [ | |
|
| Rare | [ | |
|
| Rare | [ | |
|
| Pre-menopausal females | Common | [ |
|
| Post-menopausal females | [ | |
|
| Individuals over 70 | [ | |
|
| Rare | [ | |
|
| Individuals over 70 | [ | |
|
| Rare | [ | |
|
| Individuals over 70 | [ | |
|
| Frequent | [ | |
|
| Common | [ | |
|
| Rare | [ |
a:Bacterial species are listed alphabetically.
b:A primary cohort is only specified if there was a group of significance indicated in the reference article(s).
c:Prevalence is ranked from common to frequent to rare and is only noted if again specified within the references.
Bacterial prevalence in the urinary microbiome for various urinary diseases
| Urinary disease | Genusa | Primary cohortb | Prevalencec | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder cancer |
| Increased | [ | |
|
| Increased | [ | ||
|
| Males | Decreased | [ | |
|
| Increased | [ | ||
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| Females | [ | ||
|
| Increased | [ | ||
| Benign prostatic hyperplasia |
| Males | [ | |
|
| Males | Decreased | [ | |
|
| Males | [ | ||
|
| Males | [ | ||
|
| Males | [ | ||
|
| Males | [ | ||
|
| Increased | [ | ||
| Urgency urinary incontinence |
| Females | Increased | [ |
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| Increased | [ | ||
|
| Decreased | [ | ||
|
| Increased | [ | ||
|
| Increased | [ | ||
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
| Overactive bladder syndrome |
| [ | ||
|
| Decreased | [ | ||
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| [ | |||
| Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome |
| Increased | [ | |
|
| Females | Increased | [ | |
|
| Increased | [ | ||
| Urinary tract infection |
| Females | Decreased | [ |
|
| Females | Decreased | [ | |
|
| Females | Decreased | [ | |
|
| Females | Decreased | [ | |
|
| Females | Decreased | [ |
a:Bacterial species are listed alphabetically.
b:A primary cohort is only specified if there was a primary group in which this species was found indicated in the reference article(s).
c:Prevalence is considered increased or decreased in comparison to the controls from that same study and is left blank if not specified by the reference, or if no significant difference was observed.
d:Indicative of two fungal species which were discussed in the literature that deviate from the bacterial species that make up most of the table.
Fig. 1The hypothetical mechanistic pathway of BCG in the bladder. (A) BCG is injected into the bladder via a catheter. (B) BCG identifies and attatches to tumor cells which activates a variety of pathways, including the binding of fibronectin. (C) BCG binds to the fibronectin of a tumor cell and will subsequently be absorbed into the bilipid layer. (D) BCG binding may sometimes be blocked by Lactobacillus iners, reducing the drug's efficacy. (E) If the BCG effectively blinds to the fibronectin, it is absorbed into the bilayer and promotes an immune response to destroy the tumor cell. BCG, Bacillus Calmette–Guerin.
Fig. 2New challenges in the urobiome. EQUC, expanded quantitative urine culture; NGS, next-generation sequencing.