Literature DB >> 34729638

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 19 Patients Undergoing Clitoral and Labial Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.

Adrienne N Christopher1, Sammy Othman2, Martin P Morris3, Robyn B Broach3, Ivona Percec3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is the intentional alteration, removal, or injury of female genitalia for non-medical reasons. Approximately 200 million females have been victims of FGM/C, and genital reconstructive procedures are increasing in demand.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess clinical and patient-reported outcomes after FGM/C reconstruction to help guide treatment practices.
METHODS: Adult patients undergoing anatomic reconstruction after FGM/C were retrospectively identified. Outcomes included clitoral, labial, and donor site surgical site occurrences (SSO) and the need for revision operations. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using an adapted version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a validated outcomes instrument that assesses sexual function through 6 domains, with each domain having a maximum score of 6.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified in our review. Patients presented for reconstruction due to dyspareunia, inability to orgasm, chronic infections, to normalize appearance, and/or to "feel normal." There were no SSOs and two revision operations for adhesions. 74% of patients completed the FSFI postoperatively. Despite most patients seeking repair for inability to orgasm and/or dyspareunia, the median scores for these domains were 4.6 and 5.2. Patients' desire to engage in sexual activity scored lowest (3.9), and patients reported concerns over the appearance of their genitalia (50%) that affected self-confidence (85.7%).
CONCLUSION: FGM/C reconstruction is safe and contributes to improvements in physical sexual health. Psychological trauma may contribute to lessened sexual desire and self-confidence even after reconstruction. Multidisciplinary treatment is important to address the long-term psychological effects of this practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clitoral reconstruction; Female genital mutilation; Functional outcomes; Labial reconstruction; Patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34729638     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02648-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  11 in total

1.  The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function.

Authors:  R Rosen; C Brown; J Heiman; S Leiblum; C Meston; R Shabsigh; D Ferguson; R D'Agostino
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun

2.  Defective sexuality and female circumcision: the cause and the possible management.

Authors:  Saeed Mohamad Ahmad Thabet; Ahmed S M A Thabet
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Clitoral Reconstruction Using a Vaginal Graft After Female Genital Mutilation.

Authors:  Ivan Mañero; Trinidad Labanca
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pierre Foldès; Béatrice Cuzin; Armelle Andro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: Updated Estimates of Women and Girls at Risk, 2012.

Authors:  Howard Goldberg; Paul Stupp; Ekwutosi Okoroh; Ghenet Besera; David Goodman; Isabella Danel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  [Practice of reconstructive plastic surgery of the clitoris after genital mutilation in Burkina Faso. Report of 94 cases].

Authors:  C M R Ouédraogo; S Madzou; B Touré; A Ouédraogo; S Ouédraogo; J Lankoandé
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 0.660

8.  Female Genital Mutilation Reconstruction for Plastic Surgeons-A Call to Arms.

Authors:  Takintope Akinbiyi; Emily Langston; Ivona Percec
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-11-07

9.  Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies.

Authors:  Jasmine Abdulcadir; Maria I Rodriguez; Patrick Petignat; Lale Say
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 10.  A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review.

Authors:  Rigmor C Berg; Eva Denison
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2013-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.