| Literature DB >> 34728870 |
Mohamed Abdel-Basset1, Hossam Hawash1, Nour Moustafa2, Osama M Elkomy1.
Abstract
COVID-19 stay threatening the health infrastructure worldwide. Computed tomography (CT) was demonstrated as an informative tool for the recognition, quantification, and diagnosis of this kind of disease. It is urgent to design efficient deep learning (DL) approach to automatically localize and discriminate COVID-19 from other comparable pneumonia on lung CT scans. Thus, this study introduces a novel two-stage DL framework for discriminating COVID-19 from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) depending on the detected infection region within CT slices. Firstly, a novel U-shaped network is presented to segment the lung area where the infection appears. Then, the concept of transfer learning is applied to the feature extraction network to empower the network capabilities in learning the disease patterns. After that, multi-scale information is captured and pooled via an attention mechanism for powerful classification performance. Thirdly, we propose an infection prediction module that use the infection location to guide the classification decision and hence provides interpretable classification decision. Finally, the proposed model was evaluated on public datasets and achieved great segmentation and classification performance outperforming the cutting-edge studies.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34728870 PMCID: PMC8554046 DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2021.10.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pattern Recognit Lett ISSN: 0167-8655 Impact factor: 4.757
Fig. 1Samples of COVID-19 and CAP as presented in the left and the right column, respectively. The main infection regions are specified with blue arrow.
Fig. 3The construction of GR-U-Net for lung segmentation.
Fig. 4GR-U-net performance with different number of dense blocks.
Fig. 2Architecture of Proposed Classification network.
Performance comparison of lung dataset.
| Methods | Accuracy(%) | DSC(%) | JI(%) | AUC(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2U-net | 92.13±13.1 | 88.98±8.64 | 94.96±5.41 | 94.22±8.93 |
| CE-Net | 95.08±11.4 | 91.38±4.25 | 95.26±2.93 | 96.34±10.2 |
| CPFNet | 95.61±9.18 | 93.06±6.13 | 94.21±3.45 | 95.62±7.55 |
| 97.93±9.81 | 93.97±3.21 | 97.28±2.61 | 97.88±6.12 |
The results of paired t-test experiments
| R2U-net | 0.030581 | 0.030492 | 0.10078 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE-Net | 0.042270 | 0.032882 | 0.052341 |
| CPFNet | 0.028069 | 0.042838 | 0.068629 |
Fig. 5GR-U-Net performance with and without SE blocks.
Fig. 6GR-U-Net performance with and without BConvGRU.
Fig. 7GR-U-Net ROC analysis.
Performance comparison of lung dataset.
| Methods | A | F1 | R | P | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFS-DF | 87.12% | 87.69% | 92.82% | 83.09% | 92.71% |
| CAD | 90.24% | 89.58% | 93.34% | 86.11% | 95.33% |
| COVNet | 94.65% | 94.31% | 96.51% | 92.21% | 97.12% |
| EfficientNet | 94.32% | 94.68% | 95.66% | 93.72% | 97.61% |
| 96.80% | 96.43% | 96.50% | 96.37% | 98.86% |
the results of paired t-test experiments
| AFS-DF | 0.01393 | 0.04792 | 0.02845 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAD | 0.03090 | 0.04333 | 0.00150 |
| COVNet | 0.01364 | 0.03397 | 0.04286 |
| EfficientNet | 0.02818 | 0.01361 | 0.06293 |
ablation studies for the proposed classification model
| A | F1 | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (B) | 90.43% | 91.22% | 90.14 |
| B(TL) | 93.16% | 93.22% | 95.11 |
| B(TL)+ MsFF | 94.82% | 94.83% | 98.01 |
| B (TL)+ GuInf | 95.19% | 95.51% | 98.36 |
| Proposed | 96.80% | 96.43% | 98.86% |
confusion matrix of proposed classification model.
| Actual classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted classes | COVID-19 | CAP | NIF | Recall | |
| COVID-19 | 1291 | 46 | 11 | 95.77% | |
| CAP | 41 | 906 | 6 | 95.07% | |
| NIF | 9 | 13 | 1612 | 98.65% | |
| Precision | 96.27% | 93.89% | 98.96% | ||
| F1-measure | 96.02% | 94.47% | 98.80% |
Fig. 8(a) CAP samples incorrectly classified as COVID-19 with the proposed model (b) COVID-19 samples incorrectly classified as CAP with the proposed model.