Literature DB >> 34727952

Cancer-associated fibroblast heterogeneity is associated with organ-specific metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Xingyi Pan1,2,3, Jiaojiao Zhou4,5,6, Qian Xiao1,2, Kenji Fujiwara1,2,3, Mengwen Zhang1,2,3, Guanglan Mo1,2,3, Wei Gong1,2,7,8, Lei Zheng9,10,11,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastasis occurs in the majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients at diagnosis or following resection. Patients with liver metastasis and those with lung metastasis have significantly different prognosis. Here, we sought to understand how cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play roles in the development of organ-specific metastasis.
METHODS: PDAC tumor cell lines established from the primary tumors with liver and lung metastasis potentials, respectively, in Kras/p53 mutation conditional knock-in (KPC) mice were co-cultured with matched CAFs or mouse mesenchymal stem cells. CAFs were isolated from metastases and subjected to DNA methylation and whole transcriptomic RNA sequencing analysis.
RESULTS: The ability of mouse PDAC tumor cell lines in developing liver or lung-specific metastases was demonstrated in orthotopic models. Tumor cells associated with liver metastasis potential, but not those associated with lung metastasis potential, induced the methylation of metabolism genes including NQO1 and ALDH1a3 and subsequent downregulated mRNA expression of a broader group of metabolism genes in CAFs. DNA methylation and downregulation of metabolism genes in CAFs in liver metastasis, but not those in lung metastasis, appeared to be regulated by DNA methyltransferase. Tumor cells associated with liver metastasis potential, but not those associated with lung metastasis potential, induce inflammatory CAF (iCAF) signatures. CAFs from liver metastasis demonstrated a more homogenous iCAF phenotype, whereas CAFs from lung metastasis maintained the heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: PDAC with organ-specific metastatic potentials has different capacities in inducing methylation of metabolism genes in CAFs, modulating CAF phenotypes, and resulting in different levels of heterogeneity of CAFs in different metastatic niches.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer-associated fibroblast; DNA methylation; Heterogeneity; Organ-specific metastasis; Pancreatic cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34727952      PMCID: PMC8561960          DOI: 10.1186/s13045-021-01203-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1756-8722            Impact factor:   17.388


To the editor Our clinical observations revealed disease heterogeneity among pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with different distant metastatic sites, resulting in distinct clinical outcomes [1]. We sought to investigate the mechanism of organ-specific metastasis in the transgenic KPC mouse model [2] and established two cell lines from primary tumors of KPC mouse with liver metastasis only and KPC mouse with lung metastasis only (Fig. 1a; Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Previously, we demonstrated that PDAC tumor cells induce DNA methylation globally in CAFs [3, 4] and in macrophages [5] including a wide range of metabolism genes resulting in their downregulation. We chose to examine methylation of ALDH1a3 in the glucose metabolism pathway and NQO-1 in the oxidative phosphorylation (OXIPHOS) pathway (Additional file 1: Fig. S1B) and mRNA expression of their related genes (Additional file 1: Table S1). CAFs from liver metastases and lung metastases demonstrated different levels of methylation and mRNA expression in these genes (Fig. 1b–d).
Fig. 1

Distinct DNA methylation patterns in metabolism genes were observed in CAFs isolated from liver metastasis versus lung metastasis. a Establishment of primary mouse PDAC tumor cell lines with organ-specific metastasis potentials. Different KPC tumor cell lines were established from primary pancreatic tumor of KPC mice that developed liver metastasis only and lung metastasis only, respectively. These KPC cell lines were tested for their capacities to generate metastasis in mice through the hemispleen injection model of liver metastasis and the inferior vena cava injection model of lung metastases as described previously [6, 7]. Five mice per group were used to test each KPC cell line using both mouse models, respectively. Numbers of mice that developed large metastatic lesions were indicated. Longer arrows indicate large metastatic lesions; shorter arrows indicate small metastatic lesions. Note that the KPC cell line established from primary tumor with liver metastases consistently gave rise to liver metastasis macroscopically but not lung metastasis (5/5), whereas the KPC cell line established from primary tumor with lung metastases consistently gave rise to lung metastasis (5/5). The lung met tumor cell line was only able to develop a small number of macroscopically visualized metastatic foci when the cell line was injected by the hemispleen technique (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Liver and lung were examined microscopically and confirmed that the liver met tumor cell line only developed micro-metastases in lung (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). b and c Percentages of methylation in the ALDH1a3 and NQO-1 gene were measured in tumor cells and CAFs isolated from primary pancreatic tumor and liver or lung metastases from KPC mouse with only liver or lung metastasis, respectively. Four different CAFs including: (1) CAFs isolated from primary KPC tumors of a mouse that developed liver metastasis only; (2) CAFs isolated from primary KPC tumors of a mouse that developed lung metastasis only; (3) CAFs isolated from liver metastases of a KPC mouse that developed liver metastasis only (liver mets CAFs); (4) CAFs isolated from lung metastases of a KPC mouse that developed lung metastasis only (lung mets CAFs) were all compared to normal pancreas (indicated with black arrow), liver (indicated with red arrow) and lung (indicated with green arrow) fibroblasts. Note that, for both NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 genes, DNA methylation levels were found to be elevated in liver mets CAFs from KPC mouse that developed liver metastasis compared to normal liver fibroblasts. NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 did not show an elevated DNA methylation in lung mets CAFs from KPC mouse that developed lung metastasis compared to normal lung fibroblasts, even though they demonstrated a high-level DNA methylation in CAFs from primary tumors that developed lung metastasis only. The methylation of NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 remained the same in tumor cells from both primary tumors and liver/lung metastases although the methylation level of ALDH1a3 was higher than that of NOQ-1 in tumor cells. Methylation percentage was quantified by MethySYBR real-time PCR (MSP). Black, red, green arrows indicate different comparison groups. Triplicate experimental results are presented as mean ± SEM. *Unpaired t test, p < 0.05. Independent experiments were conducted twice. d Heatmap was generated from the RNA sequencing analysis of mouse CAFs isolated from a KPC mouse that developed lung metastasis (3404LungCAF) only and from a KPC mouse that developed liver metastasis only (4545LiverCAF) to compare expression of selected metabolic genes. Mouse homologs of genes in the ALDH1-associated metabolism pathway and NQO-1-associated oxidative phosphorylation pathway previously found to have a significantly increased methylation level and also a significantly decreased mRNA expression level in CAFs following co-culture with human PDAC tumor cells [3] were selected. Heatmap was generated using transcripts per million (TPM) scores

Distinct DNA methylation patterns in metabolism genes were observed in CAFs isolated from liver metastasis versus lung metastasis. a Establishment of primary mouse PDAC tumor cell lines with organ-specific metastasis potentials. Different KPC tumor cell lines were established from primary pancreatic tumor of KPC mice that developed liver metastasis only and lung metastasis only, respectively. These KPC cell lines were tested for their capacities to generate metastasis in mice through the hemispleen injection model of liver metastasis and the inferior vena cava injection model of lung metastases as described previously [6, 7]. Five mice per group were used to test each KPC cell line using both mouse models, respectively. Numbers of mice that developed large metastatic lesions were indicated. Longer arrows indicate large metastatic lesions; shorter arrows indicate small metastatic lesions. Note that the KPC cell line established from primary tumor with liver metastases consistently gave rise to liver metastasis macroscopically but not lung metastasis (5/5), whereas the KPC cell line established from primary tumor with lung metastases consistently gave rise to lung metastasis (5/5). The lung met tumor cell line was only able to develop a small number of macroscopically visualized metastatic foci when the cell line was injected by the hemispleen technique (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Liver and lung were examined microscopically and confirmed that the liver met tumor cell line only developed micro-metastases in lung (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). b and c Percentages of methylation in the ALDH1a3 and NQO-1 gene were measured in tumor cells and CAFs isolated from primary pancreatic tumor and liver or lung metastases from KPC mouse with only liver or lung metastasis, respectively. Four different CAFs including: (1) CAFs isolated from primary KPC tumors of a mouse that developed liver metastasis only; (2) CAFs isolated from primary KPC tumors of a mouse that developed lung metastasis only; (3) CAFs isolated from liver metastases of a KPC mouse that developed liver metastasis only (liver mets CAFs); (4) CAFs isolated from lung metastases of a KPC mouse that developed lung metastasis only (lung mets CAFs) were all compared to normal pancreas (indicated with black arrow), liver (indicated with red arrow) and lung (indicated with green arrow) fibroblasts. Note that, for both NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 genes, DNA methylation levels were found to be elevated in liver mets CAFs from KPC mouse that developed liver metastasis compared to normal liver fibroblasts. NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 did not show an elevated DNA methylation in lung mets CAFs from KPC mouse that developed lung metastasis compared to normal lung fibroblasts, even though they demonstrated a high-level DNA methylation in CAFs from primary tumors that developed lung metastasis only. The methylation of NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 remained the same in tumor cells from both primary tumors and liver/lung metastases although the methylation level of ALDH1a3 was higher than that of NOQ-1 in tumor cells. Methylation percentage was quantified by MethySYBR real-time PCR (MSP). Black, red, green arrows indicate different comparison groups. Triplicate experimental results are presented as mean ± SEM. *Unpaired t test, p < 0.05. Independent experiments were conducted twice. d Heatmap was generated from the RNA sequencing analysis of mouse CAFs isolated from a KPC mouse that developed lung metastasis (3404LungCAF) only and from a KPC mouse that developed liver metastasis only (4545LiverCAF) to compare expression of selected metabolic genes. Mouse homologs of genes in the ALDH1-associated metabolism pathway and NQO-1-associated oxidative phosphorylation pathway previously found to have a significantly increased methylation level and also a significantly decreased mRNA expression level in CAFs following co-culture with human PDAC tumor cells [3] were selected. Heatmap was generated using transcripts per million (TPM) scores We hypothesized that different methylation patterns in CAFs from different metastatic sites were induced by PDAC tumor cells with different metastasis potentials. We thus studied tumor-induced DNA methylation in the mouse mesenchymal stem cell line (moMSC), the precursor of CAFs, by co-culturing with three different primary PDAC tumor cell lines derived from a KPC mouse without metastasis (PancPrimaryTumorCell), a KPC mouse with liver metastasis only (LiverMetTumorCell), and a KPC mouse with lung metastasis only (LungMetTumorCell). Remarkably, different tumor cell lines showed differential capacities in inducing DNA methylation on NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 in moMSCs (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A and B). mRNA expression of NQO-1 as well as other metabolism genes were also downregulated in moMSC co-cultured with LiverMetTumorCells (Additional file 1: Fig. S2C–E). These results suggested that different PDAC tumor cells show different capacities in possibly shaping metabolic states of CAFs in different metastatic sites. We also developed CAF lines from primary KPC tumor with liver metastasis only (4545PancCAF) or that with lung metastasis only (3403PancCAF) and co-cultured them with matched tumor cells. Induced DNA methylation changes in NQO1 and ALDH1a3 were observed at higher degrees in 4545PancCAF from tumor co-culture compared to its mono-culture than those in 3403PancCAF (Additional file 1: Fig. S2F). Consistently, NQO-1 expression was downregulated in 4545PancCAF from tumor co-culture (Additional file 1: Fig. S2G). ALDH1a3 expression was not downregulated in 4545PancCAF from tumor co-culture, suggesting that ALDH1a3 expression is regulated by a more complex mechanism (Additional file 1: Fig. S2H). We next sought to understand if tumor-induced gene methylation occurred in the metastatic niches where tumor cells metastasized to. We orthotopically implanted KPC cells with both liver and lung metastasis potentials (Fig. 2a). The transplanted mice developed liver and/or lung metastases. NQO-1 methylation was elevated in CAFs isolated from liver metastases compared to normal liver fibroblasts (Fig. 2b), but remained at baseline levels in CAFs from lung metastases (Fig. 2c). Supporting this notion, tumor-induced methylation of NQO-1 and ALDH1a3 and downregulation of their mRNA expression or expression of their related metabolism genes in CAFs from liver metastasis could be reversed by treatment of DNA demethylating agent, decitabine, whereas methylation in CAFs from lung metastasis was not affected (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). Thus, although the primary tumors harbor an organ-specific metastatic potential, metastatic organs possibly harbor contributive factors for an organ-specific tumor-induced metabolism gene methylation.
Fig. 2

PDAC tumor cells with different organ-specific metastatic potentials showed different capacities in modulating the metabolism gene methylation in CAFs and also the heterogeneity of CAFs in metastatic sites. a The schema shows that wild-type C56Bl/6 mice orthotopically implanted with primary pancreatic KPC tumors spontaneously developed liver or lung metastases, which were dissected for CAF isolation by using magnetic beads coupled with anti-FAP antibodies. Two KPC cell lines from mice that developed both liver and lung metastases were orthotopically implanted in the pancreas of 40 mice (20 mice per cell line). As previously shown [6, 7], the majority of mice died from primary tumor growth without metastases. Of 40 mice, 7 of them developed liver metastasis only and 5 developed lung metastasis only. CAFs were isolated from dissected liver and lung metastases. b Percentage of methylation in the NQO-1 gene in CAFs from multiple liver metastases was measured by MSP. Methylation percentage of NQO-1 in normal liver fibroblasts was used as a baseline methylation level for comparison. A1-7: 7 mice developed liver metastasis spontaneously. Note that methylation levels of the NQO-1 gene were elevated in CAFs isolated from liver metastases compared to normal liver fibroblasts. c Percentage of methylation in the NQO1 gene in CAFs from multiple lung metastases was measured by MSP. Methylation percentage of NQO-1 in normal lung fibroblasts was used as a baseline methylation level for comparison. B1-5: 5 mice developed lung metastasis spontaneously. Note that the gene methylation levels of NQO-1 remained at baseline levels in CAFs isolated from lung metastases compared to normal lung fibroblasts. d Heatmap was generated using TPM scores based on the RNA sequencing analysis of mouse moMSC (mMSC) after co-cultured with Liver Met tumor cells (mMSC + liver) and Lung Met tumor cells (mMSC + lung) to compare the expression of iCAF and myCAF signature genes. Red color indicates upregulation in co-culture compared to mono-culture, blue color indicates downregulation in co-culture compared to mono-culture. e Heatmap was generated using TPM based on the RNA sequencing analysis of mouse CAFs isolated from liver metastasis (4545 liver CAF) and from lung metastasis only (3403 lung CAF) to compare the expression of iCAF and myCAF signature genes. f Diagram illustration shows that CAFs in liver metastasis are reprogrammed by PDAC cells with liver metastasis potential and subsequently lose part of their heterogeneity. Note that CAFs in lung metastasis are not reprogrammed by KPC cells with lung metastasis potential and thus maintain their heterogeneity. Image created using Biorender

PDAC tumor cells with different organ-specific metastatic potentials showed different capacities in modulating the metabolism gene methylation in CAFs and also the heterogeneity of CAFs in metastatic sites. a The schema shows that wild-type C56Bl/6 mice orthotopically implanted with primary pancreatic KPC tumors spontaneously developed liver or lung metastases, which were dissected for CAF isolation by using magnetic beads coupled with anti-FAP antibodies. Two KPC cell lines from mice that developed both liver and lung metastases were orthotopically implanted in the pancreas of 40 mice (20 mice per cell line). As previously shown [6, 7], the majority of mice died from primary tumor growth without metastases. Of 40 mice, 7 of them developed liver metastasis only and 5 developed lung metastasis only. CAFs were isolated from dissected liver and lung metastases. b Percentage of methylation in the NQO-1 gene in CAFs from multiple liver metastases was measured by MSP. Methylation percentage of NQO-1 in normal liver fibroblasts was used as a baseline methylation level for comparison. A1-7: 7 mice developed liver metastasis spontaneously. Note that methylation levels of the NQO-1 gene were elevated in CAFs isolated from liver metastases compared to normal liver fibroblasts. c Percentage of methylation in the NQO1 gene in CAFs from multiple lung metastases was measured by MSP. Methylation percentage of NQO-1 in normal lung fibroblasts was used as a baseline methylation level for comparison. B1-5: 5 mice developed lung metastasis spontaneously. Note that the gene methylation levels of NQO-1 remained at baseline levels in CAFs isolated from lung metastases compared to normal lung fibroblasts. d Heatmap was generated using TPM scores based on the RNA sequencing analysis of mouse moMSC (mMSC) after co-cultured with Liver Met tumor cells (mMSC + liver) and Lung Met tumor cells (mMSC + lung) to compare the expression of iCAF and myCAF signature genes. Red color indicates upregulation in co-culture compared to mono-culture, blue color indicates downregulation in co-culture compared to mono-culture. e Heatmap was generated using TPM based on the RNA sequencing analysis of mouse CAFs isolated from liver metastasis (4545 liver CAF) and from lung metastasis only (3403 lung CAF) to compare the expression of iCAF and myCAF signature genes. f Diagram illustration shows that CAFs in liver metastasis are reprogrammed by PDAC cells with liver metastasis potential and subsequently lose part of their heterogeneity. Note that CAFs in lung metastasis are not reprogrammed by KPC cells with lung metastasis potential and thus maintain their heterogeneity. Image created using Biorender Nevertheless, it was unknown whether CAFs from different metastatic niches are functionally different. The functions of the subpopulations of CAFs were previously characterized and showed different transcriptomic signatures [8-10]. In our RNA sequencing analysis, mono-cultured moMSCs showed low expression of the majority of inflammatory CAF (iCAF) signature genes (Additional file 1: Table S2) and high expression of some of myofibroblastic CAF (myCAF) signature genes (Fig. 2d). However, upon co-cultured with LiverMetTumorCells, moMSC was programmed to express essentially all iCAF signature genes and the majority of myCAF signature genes. However, expression of the majority of iCAF and myCAF genes in moMSC co-cultured with LungMetTumorCell remained low, suggesting that LungMetTumorCell was not able to program moMSC. As expected, CAFs from lung metastasis expresses both iCAF genes and myCAF genes (Fig. 2e). By contrast, CAFs from liver metastasis did not demonstrate a myCAF signature, but expressed some iCAF genes that were not upregulated in CAFs from lung metastasis. Taken together, CAFs in liver metastasis are more homogeneous likely as a result of reprogramming of myCAF into iCAF by tumor cells that metastasize to liver, whereas CAFs in lung metastasis remain to be heterogenous (Fig. 2f). A change in the heterogeneity of CAFs to a more homogeneous iCAF phenotype may be responsible for the aggressive feature of liver metastasis and is potentially targetable by anti-IL-1β antibody [11]. Additional file 1. Representative images of lung and liver metastases from KPC mice implanted with KPC tumor cells with lung and liver metatasis potentials and schema of how represntative metabolism genes were selected for study.
  11 in total

1.  Cross-Species Single-Cell Analysis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Reveals Antigen-Presenting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mohan Bolisetty; Pasquale Laise; William F Flynn; Ela Elyada; Elise T Courtois; Richard A Burkhart; Jonathan A Teinor; Pascal Belleau; Giulia Biffi; Matthew S Lucito; Santhosh Sivajothi; Todd D Armstrong; Dannielle D Engle; Kenneth H Yu; Yuan Hao; Christopher L Wolfgang; Youngkyu Park; Jonathan Preall; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Andrea Califano; Paul Robson; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  IL1-Induced JAK/STAT Signaling Is Antagonized by TGFβ to Shape CAF Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Giulia Biffi; Tobiloba E Oni; Benjamin Spielman; Yuan Hao; Ela Elyada; Youngkyu Park; Jonathan Preall; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Pancreatic Cancer Are Reprogrammed by Tumor-Induced Alterations in Genomic DNA Methylation.

Authors:  Qian Xiao; Donger Zhou; Agnieszka A Rucki; Jamila Williams; Jiaojiao Zhou; Guanglan Mo; Adrian Murphy; Kenji Fujiwara; Jennifer Kleponis; Bulent Salman; Christopher L Wolfgang; Robert A Anders; Shu Zheng; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Heterogeneous Stromal Signaling within the Tumor Microenvironment Controls the Metastasis of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Agnieszka A Rucki; Kelly Foley; Pingbo Zhang; Qian Xiao; Jennifer Kleponis; Annie A Wu; Rajni Sharma; Guanglan Mo; Angen Liu; Jennifer Van Eyk; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas with recurrence limited in lung have a significantly better prognosis than those with other recurrence patterns.

Authors:  Tamna Wangjam; Zhe Zhang; Xian Chong Zhou; Laxmi Lyer; Farzana Faisal; Kevin C Soares; Elliott Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Joseph M Herman; Daniel Laheru; Matthew Weiss; Min Li; Ana De Jesus-Acosta; Christopher L Wolfgang; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-03

6.  Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice.

Authors:  Sunil R Hingorani; Lifu Wang; Asha S Multani; Chelsea Combs; Therese B Deramaudt; Ralph H Hruban; Anil K Rustgi; Sandy Chang; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Semaphorin 3D autocrine signaling mediates the metastatic role of annexin A2 in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kelly Foley; Agnieszka A Rucki; Qian Xiao; Donger Zhou; Ashley Leubner; Guanglan Mo; Jennifer Kleponis; Annie A Wu; Rajni Sharma; Qingguang Jiang; Robert A Anders; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Katherine A Hajjar; Anirban Maitra; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 8.192

8.  Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Öhlund; Abram Handly-Santana; Giulia Biffi; Ela Elyada; Ana S Almeida; Mariano Ponz-Sarvise; Vincenzo Corbo; Tobiloba E Oni; Stephen A Hearn; Eun Jung Lee; Iok In Christine Chio; Chang-Il Hwang; Hervé Tiriac; Lindsey A Baker; Dannielle D Engle; Christine Feig; Anne Kultti; Mikala Egeblad; Douglas T Fearon; James M Crawford; Hans Clevers; Youngkyu Park; David A Tuveson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Pancreatic cancer cells render tumor-associated macrophages metabolically reprogrammed by a GARP and DNA methylation-mediated mechanism.

Authors:  Mengwen Zhang; Xingyi Pan; Kenji Fujiwara; Noelle Jurcak; Stephen Muth; Jiaojiao Zhou; Qian Xiao; Anqi Li; Xu Che; Zihai Li; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-10-29

Review 10.  Epigenetics in modulating immune functions of stromal and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Xingyi Pan; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 11.530

View more
  3 in total

1.  CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor permits the radiation-induced effector T cell infiltration in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jianxin Wang; May Tun Saung; Keyu Li; Juan Fu; Kenji Fujiwara; Nan Niu; Stephen Muth; Junke Wang; Yao Xu; Noah Rozich; Haley Zlomke; Sophia Chen; Birginia Espinoza; MacKenzie Henderson; Vanessa Funes; Brian Herbst; Ding Ding; Christina Twyman-Saint Victor; Qihong Zhao; Amol Narang; Jin He; Lei Zheng
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 14.307

2.  Multiphasic Heterogeneity of Fibroblasts in the Microenvironment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Dissection and the Sum of the Dynamics.

Authors:  Hideaki Ijichi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Bête Noire of Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy: CAF-Mediated Resistance.

Authors:  Pradip De; Jennifer Aske; Raed Sulaiman; Nandini Dey
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.