Literature DB >> 34726535

Interrater Agreement of Bosniak Classification Version 2019 and Version 2005 for Cystic Renal Masses at CT and MRI.

Kimberly L Shampain1, Prasad R Shankar1, Jonathan P Troost1, Maarten L Galantowicz1, Rudra A Pampati1, Taylor R Schoenheit1, David A Shlensky1, Daniel Barkmeier1, Nicole E Curci1, Ravi K Kaza1, Shokoufeh Khalatbari1, Matthew S Davenport1.   

Abstract

Background The Bosniak classification system for cystic renal masses was updated in 2019 in part to improve agreement compared with the 2005 version. Purpose To compare and investigate interrater agreement of Bosniak version 2019 and Bosniak version 2005 at CT and MRI. Materials and Methods In this retrospective single-center study, a blinded eight-reader assessment was performed in which 195 renal masses prospectively considered Bosniak IIF-IV (95 at CT, 100 at MRI, from 2006 to 2019 with version 2005) were re-evaluated with Bosniak versions 2019 and 2005. Radiologists (four faculty members, four residents) who were blinded to the initial clinical reading and histopathologic findings assessed all feature components and reported the overall Bosniak class for each system independently. Agreement was assessed with Gwet agreement coefficients. Uni- and multivariable linear regression models were developed to identify predictors of dispersion in the final Bosniak class assignment that could inform system refinement. Results A total of 185 patients were included (mean age, 63 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 118 men). Overall interrater agreement was similar between Bosniak version 2019 and version 2005 (Gwet agreement coefficient: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.57] vs 0.46 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.51]). This was true for experts (0.54 vs 0.49) and novices (0.50 vs 0.47) and at CT (0.56 vs 0.51) and MRI (0.52 vs 0.43). Nine percent of masses prospectively considered cystic using Bosniak version 2005 criteria were considered solid using version 2019 criteria. In general, masses were more commonly classified in lower categories when radiologists used Bosniak version 2019 criteria compared with version 2005 criteria. The sole predictor of dispersion in Bosniak version 2019 class assignment was dispersion in septa or wall quality (ie, smooth vs irregular thickening vs nodule; 72% [MRI] and 60% [CT] overall model variance explained; multivariable P < .001). Conclusion Overall interrater agreement was similar between Bosniak version 2019 and version 2005; disagreements in septa or wall quality were common and strongly predictive of variation in Bosniak class assignment. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Eberhardt in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34726535      PMCID: PMC8805658          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation.

Authors:  C L Siegel; E G McFarland; J A Brink; A J Fisher; P Humphrey; J P Heiken
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.

Authors:  Kilem Li Gwet
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Bosniak classification system: inter-observer and intra-observer agreement among experienced uroradiologists.

Authors:  Ole Graumann; Susanne S Osther; Jens Karstoft; Arne Hørlyck; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  The Bosniak Classification Gets Even Better.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The Bosniak renal cyst classification: 25 years later.

Authors:  Morton A Bosniak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prevalence of Malignancy and Histopathological Association of Bosniak Classification, Version 2019 Class III and IV Cystic Renal Masses.

Authors:  Justin R Tse; Luyao Shen; Jody Shen; Luke Yoon; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The current radiological approach to renal cysts.

Authors:  M A Bosniak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Progression, interobserver agreement, and malignancy rate in complex renal cysts ( ≥ Bosniak category IIF).

Authors:  Ismail El-Mokadem; Mathew Budak; Sanjay Pillai; Stephen Lang; Robert Doull; Chris Goodman; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Bosniak Classification Version 2019 of Cystic Renal Masses Assessed With MRI.

Authors:  Justin R Tse; Jody Shen; Luke Yoon; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.