Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted significant racial and age-related health disparities. In response to pandemic-related restrictions, orthopedic surgery departments have expanded telemedicine use. We analyzed data from a tertiary care institute during the pandemic to understand potential racial and age-based disparities in access to care and telemedicine utilization. Materials and Methods: Data on patient race and age, and numbers of telemedicine visits, in-person office visits, and types of telemedicine were extracted for time periods during and preceding the pandemic. We calculated odds ratios for visit occurrence and type across race and age groups. Results: Patients ages 27-54 were 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.4, p < 0.01) and 1.2 (95% CI 1.0-1.3, p < 0.05) times more likely to be seen than patients <27 during the pandemic, versus the 2019 and 2020 controls. Patients 54-82 were 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5, p < 0.001) times more likely to be seen than patients <27 during the pandemic versus the 2019 control. Patients 27-54, 54-82, and 82+, respectively, were 3.3 (95% CI 2.6-4.2, p < 1e-20), 3.5 (95% CI 2.8-4.4, p < 1e-24), and 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.4, p < 0.05) times more likely to be seen by telemedicine than patients <27. Among pandemic telemedicine appointments, Black patients were 1.5 (95% CI 1.2-1.9, p < 1e-3) times more likely to be seen by audio-only telemedicine than White patients, as compared with video telemedicine. Conclusions: Telemedicine access barriers must be reduced to ensure that disparities during the pandemic do not persist.
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted significant racial and age-related health disparities. In response to pandemic-related restrictions, orthopedic surgery departments have expanded telemedicine use. We analyzed data from a tertiary care institute during the pandemic to understand potential racial and age-based disparities in access to care and telemedicine utilization. Materials and Methods: Data on patient race and age, and numbers of telemedicine visits, in-person office visits, and types of telemedicine were extracted for time periods during and preceding the pandemic. We calculated odds ratios for visit occurrence and type across race and age groups. Results: Patients ages 27-54 were 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.4, p < 0.01) and 1.2 (95% CI 1.0-1.3, p < 0.05) times more likely to be seen than patients <27 during the pandemic, versus the 2019 and 2020 controls. Patients 54-82 were 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5, p < 0.001) times more likely to be seen than patients <27 during the pandemic versus the 2019 control. Patients 27-54, 54-82, and 82+, respectively, were 3.3 (95% CI 2.6-4.2, p < 1e-20), 3.5 (95% CI 2.8-4.4, p < 1e-24), and 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.4, p < 0.05) times more likely to be seen by telemedicine than patients <27. Among pandemic telemedicine appointments, Black patients were 1.5 (95% CI 1.2-1.9, p < 1e-3) times more likely to be seen by audio-only telemedicine than White patients, as compared with video telemedicine. Conclusions: Telemedicine access barriers must be reduced to ensure that disparities during the pandemic do not persist.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; age disparities; orthopedics; racial disparities; telehealth; telemedicine
Authors: Ugochi T Aguwa; Chibuzo J Aguwa; Michael Repka; Uma Srikumaran; Fasika Woreta; Eric L Singman; Sabrina G Jenkins; Divya Srikumaran Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Sadiq Y Patel; Ateev Mehrotra; Haiden A Huskamp; Lori Uscher-Pines; Ishani Ganguli; Michael Lawrence Barnett Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Lauren A Eberly; Michael J Kallan; Howard M Julien; Norrisa Haynes; Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Ashwin S Nathan; Christopher Snider; Neel P Chokshi; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Samuel U Takvorian; Rebecca Anastos-Wallen; Krisda Chaiyachati; Marietta Ambrose; Rupal O'Quinn; Matthew Seigerman; Lee R Goldberg; Damien Leri; Katherine Choi; Yevginiy Gitelman; Daniel M Kolansky; Thomas P Cappola; Victor A Ferrari; C William Hanson; Mary Elizabeth Deleener; Srinath Adusumalli Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-12-01
Authors: Akshaya V Annapragada; Sabrina G Jenkins; Annika L Chang; Amit Jain; Divya Srikumaran; Uma Srikumaran Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Clara Bonanad; Sergio García-Blas; Francisco Tarazona-Santabalbina; Juan Sanchis; Vicente Bertomeu-González; Lorenzo Fácila; Albert Ariza; Julio Núñez; Alberto Cordero Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Mark É Czeisler; Kristy Marynak; Kristie E N Clarke; Zainab Salah; Iju Shakya; JoAnn M Thierry; Nida Ali; Hannah McMillan; Joshua F Wiley; Matthew D Weaver; Charles A Czeisler; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Mark E Howard Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Noel Oizerovici Foni; Lauro Augusto Veloso Costa; Leandro Manuel Reis Velloso; Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-10-29
Authors: Alessandro Paro; Daniel R Rice; J Madison Hyer; Elizabeth Palmer; Aslam Ejaz; Chanza Fahim Shaikh; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.339