| Literature DB >> 34724668 |
Francisco Ferrer1, Marisa Roldão1, Cátia Figueiredo1, Karina Lopes1.
Abstract
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) affecting the kidneys. Compared with typical HUS due to an infection from shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, atypical HUS involves a genetic or acquired dysregulation of the complement alternative pathway. In the presence of a mutation in a complement gene, a second trigger is often necessary for the development of the disease. We report a case of a 54-year-old female, with a past medical history of pulmonary tuberculosis, who was admitted to the emergency service with general malaise and reduction in urine output, 5 days after vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Laboratory results revealed microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Given the clinical picture of TMA, plasma exchange (PEX) was immediately started, along with hemodialysis. Complementary laboratory workup for TMA excluded thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and secondary causes. Complement study revealed normal levels of factors H, B, and I, normal activity of the alternate pathway, and absence of anti-factor H antibodies. Genetic study of complement did not show pathogenic variants in the 12 genes analyzed, but revealed a deletion in gene CFHR3/CFHR1 in homozygosity. Our patient completed 10 sessions of PEX, followed by eculizumab, with both clinical and laboratorial improvement. Actually, given the short time lapse between vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and the clinical manifestations, we believe that vaccine was the trigger for the presentation of aHUS in this particular case.Entities:
Keywords: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Thrombotic microangiopathy; Vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34724668 PMCID: PMC8678224 DOI: 10.1159/000519461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nephron ISSN: 1660-8151 Impact factor: 2.847
Immunological, autoimmune, and complement study
| Analytical parameters | Value | Reference value |
|---|---|---|
| C3 | 70.70 mg/dL | 79.00–152.00 |
| C4 | 21.90 mg/dL | 16.00–38.00 |
| CH50 | 92 U/mL | >42 |
| AH50, % | >137 | >70 |
| Anti-cardiolipin antibody (ELISA) | IgM: 1.90 MPL/mL | Positive: >40.0 |
| Weakly positive: 10.0–40.0 | ||
| Negative: <1.0 | ||
| IgG: 1.10 GPL/mL | ||
| Antinuclear antibody (ELISA) | 0.10 (ratio) | Positive: >1.1 |
| Doubtful: 0.9–1.1 | ||
| Negative: <0.9 | ||
| pANCA (indirect immunofluorescence) | Negative | - |
| cANCA (indirect immunofluorescence) | Negative | - |
| Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody | 0.90 U/mL | Positive: >10.0 |
| (immunofluorescence) | Doubtful: 7.0–10.0 | |
| Negative: <7.0 | ||
| Anti-dsDNA antibody (ELISA) | <10.00 IU/mL | Negative: <100 |
| Positive: ≥100 | ||
| Complement factor I | 2.69 mg/dL | 2.38–3.18 |
| Complement factor B | 38.50 mg/dL | 17.04–51.06 |
| Complement factor H | 54.80 mg/dL | 47.45–65.99 |
| Complement factor H antibody (ELISA) | 8.05 UA/mL | <27 |
| ADAMTS13 activity | 0.79 UI/mL | ≥0.67 |
| ADAMTS13 antibody (ELISA) | 1.19 U/mL | <15 |
Fig. 1Evolution of serum creatinine, urine output, serum hemoglobin, and platelet count in the first 31 days after diagnosis.