Literature DB >> 34724582

A comparison of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancies.

Jonathan J Hue1, Peter Ahorukomeye2, Katherine Bingmer1, Lauren Drapalik1, John B Ammori1, Scott M Wilhelm1, Luke D Rothermel1, Christopher W Towe3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend open adrenalectomy for most resectable adrenal malignancies, minimally invasive adrenalectomies are performed. Robotic adrenalectomies have become more popular recently, but there is a paucity of literature comparing laparoscopic and robotic resections.
METHODS: Patients who underwent a planned minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancies (adrenocortical carcinoma, malignant pheochromocytoma, other carcinoma) were identified in the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was the conversion rate from minimally invasive to open. Other post-operative outcomes and survival were compared.
RESULTS: 416 patients (76.5%) underwent a laparoscopic adrenalectomy and 128 (23.5%) underwent a robotic operation. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar. Approximately 19% of tumors resected by a minimally invasive approach were > 10 cm. The intra-operative conversion rate was decreased among robotic adrenalectomies relative to laparoscopic on univariate (7.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.005) and multivariable (odds ratio 0.39, p = 0.01) analyses. Using marginal standardization, there was a stepwise increase in the conversion rate as tumor size increased (< 5, 5-10, > 10 cm) for laparoscopic (7.5%, 18.0%, 33.2%) and robotic (3.1%, 8.3%, 17.3%) adrenalectomies. Operations which required conversion had a greater margin positivity rate, greater length of stay, and an association with poor overall survival.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to most clinical guidelines, minimally invasive adrenalectomies are being performed on large malignant tumors. A laparoscopic approach was associated with a greater conversion rate and subsequent poor outcomes. If a surgeon is not planning an open adrenalectomy, but adrenal malignancy is a possibility, robotic adrenalectomy may be the preferred approach for resectable adrenal tumors.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adrenalectomy; Adrenocortical carcinoma; Minimally invasive surgery; Pheochromocytoma

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34724582     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08827-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  21 in total

1.  Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Shamil Aliyev; Koray Karabulut; Orhan Agcaoglu; Katherine Wolf; Jamie Mitchell; Allan Siperstein; Eren Berber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Medical Guidelines for the Management of Adrenal Incidentalomas: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Martha A Zeiger; Geoffrey B Thompson; Quan-Yang Duh; Amir H Hamrahian; Peter Angelos; Dina Elaraj; Elliott Fishman; Julia Kharlip
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A letter in response to "Is liver transplantation a viable option for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma".

Authors:  Jonathan J Hue; Lee M Ocuin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Preoperative imaging and prediction of oesophageal conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  P Lainas; D Fuks; S Gaujoux; Z Machroub; A Fregeville; T Perniceni; F Mal; B Dousset; B Gayet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A nationwide analysis of pancreatic cancer trial enrollment reveals disparities and participation problems.

Authors:  Jonathan J Hue; Erryk S Katayama; Sarah C Markt; Mohamedraed Elshami; Joel Saltzman; David Bajor; Amy Hosmer; Shaffer Mok; John Dumot; John B Ammori; Luke D Rothermel; Jeffrey M Hardacre; Jordan M Winter; Lee M Ocuin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  How do SAGES members rate its guidelines?

Authors:  William W Hope; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Implications of Conversion during Attempted Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Olivia M Delozier; Zachary E Stiles; Benjamin W Deschner; Justin A Drake; Jeremiah L Deneve; Evan S Glazer; Miriam W Tsao; Danny Yakoub; Paxton V Dickson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Innovation in endocrine surgery: robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Antonino Agrusa; Giorgio Romano; Giuseppe Navarra; Giovanni Conzo; Gianni Pantuso; Giuseppe Di Buono; Roberto Citarrella; Massimo Galia; Attilio Lo Monte; Gaspare Cucinella; Gaspare Gulotta
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-19

9.  Patient safety and surgical innovation-complementary or mutually exclusive?

Authors:  Dan E Azagury
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-04-02

10.  The prevalence and characteristics of non-functioning and autonomous cortisol secreting adrenal incidentaloma after patients' stratification by body mass index and age.

Authors:  Ana Podbregar; Andrej Janez; Katja Goricar; Mojca Jensterle
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.763

View more
  1 in total

1.  Robotic Adrenalectomy: An Initial Experience in a Turkish Regional Hospital.

Authors:  Ayhan Erdemir; Kemal Rasa
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.