Literature DB >> 3472457

Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.

M F Talass, L Talass, R C Baker.   

Abstract

The response of the soft-tissue profile to retraction of the maxillary incisors is still a matter of controversy. The purpose of this study was to improve the clinician's ability to predict the soft-tissue profile changes caused by retraction of the maxillary incisors by quantifying the profile changes, and identifying and quantifying the contribution of the most significant factors responsible for these changes. The cephalometric records of 80 Class II, Division 1 treated female subjects and 53 untreated female subjects were digitized and analyzed by means of a stepwise multiple regression analysis. The statistical assessment of the data suggested the following conclusions: In general, growth was associated with only minimal changes in the soft-tissue profile in a period not exceeding 36 months. The three clinically significant soft-tissue changes occurring in response to orthodontic treatment that included a mean upper incisor retraction of 6.7 mm were the retraction of the upper lip, the increase in the lower lip length, and the increase in the nasolabial angle. Other soft-tissue changes, which were of little clinical significance, included the retraction of the lower lip, the reduction of the interlabial gap, the increase in the thickness of both the upper and lower lips, the increase in the soft-tissue lower facial height and the lower soft-tissue component, which is the distance between lower stomion and soft-tissue menton. The length of the upper lip did not increase with either growth or orthodontic treatment. In general, changes in the lower lip in response to orthodontic tooth movement were more predictable than those of the upper lip. The low degree of predictability associated with the upper lip response to orthodontic tooth movement may be caused by the complex anatomy and/or dynamics of the upper lip, which could not be evaluated by the presently available cephalometric techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3472457     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90391-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  24 in total

Review 1.  Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?

Authors:  Caroline Wilkinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions.

Authors:  Dimitrios Konstantonis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Ulrich Gross; Linda Frye; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  [The accuracy of soft tissue profile prediction with the "Dentofacial Planner" in skeletal prognathism].

Authors:  E Fischer-Brandies; H Seeholzer; H Fischer-Brandies; R Wimmer
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-10

5.  Is It Possible to Protract the Maxilla by Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Intermaxillary Class III Elastics?

Authors:  Emir Bahman Şahbaz; Emre Cesur; Ayşe Tuba Altuğ; Kutay Can Ergül; Hakan Alpay Karasu; Ufuk Toygar Memikoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

Review 6.  Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rosalia Leonardi; Alberto Annunziata; Valeria Licciardello; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Vertical gingival display changes associated with upper premolars extraction orthodontic treatment: A prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Michel F Fallas; Elham S Abu-Alhaija; Susan N Alkhateeb; Shadi S Samawi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-11-01

8.  Comparison of esthetic outcome after extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment in class II division 1 malocclusion patients.

Authors:  Sneh Lata Verma; V P Sharma; Pradeep Tandon; Gyan P Singh; Kiran Sachan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-04

9.  Evaluation of the Immediate Dentofacial Changes in Late Adolescent Patients Treated with the Forsus(™) FRD.

Authors:  Esen Ali Gunay; Tulin Arun; Didem Nalbantgil
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-10

10.  A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS(2)) and Forsus FRD appliances.

Authors:  Mehmet Oguz Oztoprak; Didem Nalbantgil; Ayhan Uyanlar; Tulin Arun
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.