| Literature DB >> 34723632 |
Wassihun Wedajo Aragaw1, Christine Roubert2, Evelyne Fontaine2, Sophie Lagrange2, Matthew D Zimmerman1, Véronique Dartois1,3, Martin Gengenbacher1,3, Thomas Dick1,3,4.
Abstract
Cyclohexyl-griselimycin is a preclinical candidate for use against tuberculosis (TB). Here, we show that this oral cyclodepsipeptide is also active against the intrinsically drug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium Mycobacterium abscessus in vitro and in a mouse model of infection. This adds a novel advanced lead compound to the M. abscessus drug pipeline and supports a strategy of screening chemical matter generated in TB drug discovery efforts to fast-track the discovery of novel antibiotics against M. abscessus.Entities:
Keywords: DnaN; Mycobacterium abscessus; NTM; griselimycin; nontuberculous mycobacteria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34723632 PMCID: PMC8765428 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01400-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Structure of cyclohexyl-griselimycin, CGM (12).
In vitro activity of cyclohexyl-griselimycin (CGM) against M. abscessus
| Strains | CLR sensitivity | MIC (μM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGM | CLR | |||
| Culture collection reference strains | ||||
| T28 | Resistant | 0.5 | 3 | |
| Deletion | Sensitive | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
| T28 | Resistant | 0.8 | 6 | |
| Clinical isolates | ||||
| C28 | Sensitive | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
| T28 | Resistant | 0.8 | 6 | |
| T28 | Resistant | 0.8 | 6 | |
| T28 | Resistant | 0.8 | 6 | |
| C28 | Sensitive | 0.2 | 0.6 | |
| T28 | Resistant | 0.4 | 2 | |
| T28 | Resistant | 0.4 | 3 | |
| C28 | Sensitive | 0.1 | 0.6 | |
| Deletion | Sensitive | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
| C28 | Sensitive | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
MICs are defined as drug concentrations causing 90% growth inhibition compared to untreated control and are means from two independent experiments.
Described in references 21, 23, and 24.
erm(41), ribosome methylase. T28 sequevars confer inducible clarithromycin (CLR) resistance. C28 and “deletion” sequevars are CLR sensitive (25). CLR was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and included as a positive control.
FIG 2Bactericidal activity of cyclohexyl-griselimycin (CGM) against M. abscessus. (A and B) Exponential-phase cultures of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 (A) and M. abscessus K21 (B) were treated with CGM at the indicated increasing concentrations, and CFU were enumerated at time zero and after 1 and 3 days by plating appropriate sample dilutions on Middlebrook 7H10 agar (BD Difco) (21). CGM MIC against M. abscessus ATCC 19977, 0.5 μM; CGM MIC against M. abscessus K21, 0.4 μM (Table 1). Note the higher CGM concentrations required to reduce the CFU of M. abscessus K21 cultures compared to M. abscessus ATCC 19977. (C and D) Results of the same experiment carried out with the mainly bacteriostatic clarithromycin (CLR) as a control. Note that M. abscessus ATCC 19977 harbors a functional erm(41) conferring inducible macrolide resistance (reflected by a higher MIC of 3 μM) (Table 1), whereas M. abscessus K21 harbors a noninducible sequevar of erm(41) (reflected by a lower MIC of 0.4 μM) (Table 1). The results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multicomparison (****, P < 0.0001; ns, nonsignificant [P > 0.05]). Experiments were carried out three times independently. Mean values and standard deviations are shown. LoD, limit of detection.
FIG 3In vivo activity of cyclohexyl-griselimycin (CGM) against M. abscessus. NOD SCID mice were infected intranasally with 106 CFU of M. abscessus K21. At 1 day postinfection, 6 mice were euthanized to determine the bacterial load of organs prior to starting chemotherapy. Groups of 6 mice were treated by daily oral gavage for 10 consecutive days with CGM, the control drug clarithromycin (CLR), or vehicle only and were euthanized 24 h after the last dose. The bacterial burden in lungs (A) and spleen (B) was determined by plating organ homogenates on agar. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multicomparison and Tukey’s posttest (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001). One representative data set of two independent experiments is shown. LoD, limit of detection. The LoD for the results depicted in panel A was 10 CFU.