Literature DB >> 34722354

Gender-Related Differences in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Angkawipa Trongtorsak1, Natchaya Polpichai2, Sittinun Thangjui3, Jakrin Kewcharoen4, Ratdanai Yodsuwan3, Amrit Devkota1, Harvey J Friedman5, Alfonso Q Estrada6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gender-related differences in phenotypic expression and outcomes have been established in many cardiac conditions; however, the impact of gender in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between female and male HCM patients.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to October 2020. Included were cohort studies that compared outcomes of interest including all-cause mortality, HCM-related mortality, and worsening heart failure (HF) or HF hospitalization between male and female. Data from each study were combined using the random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies with a total of 9,427 patients (3,719 females) were included. Female gender was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (pooled OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26-2.10, p ≤ 0.001), HCM-related mortality (pooled OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.08-2.01, p = 0.015), and worsening HF or HF hospitalization (pooled OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.76-2.39, p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Female gender was associated with a worse prognosis in HCM. These findings suggest the need for improved care in women including early identification of disease and more possible aggressive management. Moreover, gender-based strategy may benefit in HCM patients.
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender-related differences; Heart failure; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Mortality

Year:  2021        PMID: 34722354      PMCID: PMC8527921          DOI: 10.1159/000517618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulse (Basel)        ISSN: 2235-8668


  41 in total

1.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

Review 2.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barry J Maron
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Trends in Hospitalizations and Survival of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in Four US Communities (2005-2014): ARIC Study Community Surveillance.

Authors:  Patricia P Chang; Lisa M Wruck; Eyal Shahar; Joseph S Rossi; Laura R Loehr; Stuart D Russell; Sunil K Agarwal; Suma H Konety; Carlos J Rodriguez; Wayne D Rosamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Pathophysiology: Why Women Are Overrepresented in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Anna L Beale; Philippe Meyer; Thomas H Marwick; Carolyn S P Lam; David M Kaye
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Gender-related differences in the clinical presentation and outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Iacopo Olivotto; Martin S Maron; A Selcuk Adabag; Susan A Casey; Daniela Vargiu; Mark S Link; James E Udelson; Franco Cecchi; Barry J Maron
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Clinical characteristics of and long-term outcome in Chinese patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hee-Hwa Ho; Kathy L F Lee; Chu-Pak Lau; Hung-Fat Tse
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Effect of Gender and Genetic Mutations on Outcomes in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hannah G van Velzen; Arend F L Schinkel; Sara J Baart; Roy Huurman; Marjon A van Slegtenhorst; Isabella Kardys; Michelle Michels
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Impact of sex on timing and clinical outcome of septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Roy Huurman; Arend F L Schinkel; Peter L de Jong; Marjon A van Slegtenhorst; Alexander Hirsch; Michelle Michels
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.

Authors:  Mark Simmonds
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-11

10.  Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Karel G M Moons; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.273

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.