| Literature DB >> 34722265 |
Mingwei Yang1, Panpan Hu2, Minglun Li3, Rui Ding4, Yichun Wang1, Shuhao Pan1, Mei Kang1, Weihao Kong5, Dandan Du6, Fan Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because of the superficial and infiltrative spreading patterns of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), an accurate assessment of tumor extent is challenging using imaging-based clinical staging. Radiomics features extracted from pretreatment computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging have shown promise in identifying tumor characteristics. Accurate staging is essential for planning cancer treatment, especially for deciding whether to offer surgery or radiotherapy (chemotherapy) in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics as a non-invasive approach for estimating pathological tumor extent in ESCC patients.Entities:
Keywords: CT; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; radiomic; tumor T stage; tumor length
Year: 2021 PMID: 34722265 PMCID: PMC8553111 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Selection flow of ESCC patients.
Figure 2The process of segmentation. (A) VOI contouring on an enhanced axial CT slice. (B) Three-dimensional image of esophageal cancer. VOI, volume of interest.
Figure 3Radiomics analysis workflow.
General clinicopathological characteristics of enrolled patients.
| Characteristics | N |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 116 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 95 (81.9%) |
| Female | 21 (18.1%) |
| Age (years) | |
| ≤65 | 63 (54.3%) |
| >65 | 53 (45.7%) |
| Tumor location | |
| Upper-middle | 11 (9.5%) |
| Middle | 47 (40.5%) |
| Middle-lower | 40 (34.5%) |
| Lower | 18 (15.5%) |
| Tumor grade | |
| Low | 81 (69.8%) |
| High | 35 (30.2%) |
| T stage | |
| T1–T2 | 22 (19.0%) |
| T3–T4 | 94 (81.0%) |
| N stage | |
| N0–1 | 91 (78.4%) |
| N2–3 | 25 (21.6%) |
| TNM stage (8th edition, 2017) | |
| I–II | 56 (48.3%) |
| III–IV | 60 (51.7%) |
| Tumor length (cm) | |
| ≤4.5 | 75 (64.7%) |
| >4.5 | 41 (35.3%) |
Figure 4Radiomics feature heatmap. The x-axis represents each patient, and the y-axis represents each radiomics feature.
Chi-square analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics between clusters.
| Characteristics | χ2 | p |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 0.135 | 0.7134 |
| PFS | 0.024 | 0.8767 |
| pT | 4.993 | 0.0254 |
| pN | 0.067 | 0.7955 |
| HG | 0.244 | 0.6217 |
| VI | 2.926 | 0.0872 |
| TNM stage | 0.224 | 0.6360 |
| Tumor length | 14.262 | 0.0002 |
OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; pT, pathological T stage, pN, pathological N stage, HG, histological grade, VI, vascular invasion.
Figure 5Receiver operating curve analysis for T stage using the radiomics model.
Figure 6Receiver operating curve analysis for length using the radiomics model.
Figure 7Radiomics nomogram for predicting T stage. Radiomic features, which included HL_HIST range absolute and GEOM volume, corresponded to a point by drawing a vertical line from the location on the HL_HIST range absolute axis or GEOM volume axis up to the point axis. The sum of all points was used to predict the T stage by drawing a vertical line up to the invasive axis, where the closer the line was to the left side of the invasive axis, the lower the T stage.
Figure 8Radiomics nomogram for predicting tumor length. Radiomics features, which included HL_HIST range absolute and GEOM volume, corresponded to a point by drawing a vertical line from the location on the HL_HIST range absolute axis or GEOM volume axis up to the point axis. The sum of all points was used to predict tumor length by drawing a vertical line up to the invasive axis, where the closer the line was to the left side of the invasive axis, the shorter the tumor length.