| Literature DB >> 34721982 |
Maokai Yan1, Xingyue Jin2, Yanhui Liu2, Huihuang Chen2, Tao Ye2, Zhimin Hou2, Zhenxia Su2, Yingzhi Chen1, Mohammad Aslam1, Yuan Qin1,2, Xiaoping Niu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum L.), the major sugar and biofuel feedstock crop, is cultivated mainly by vegetative propagation worldwide due to the infertility of female reproductive organs resulting in the reduction of quality and output of sugar. Deciphering the gene expression profile during ovule development will improve our understanding of the complications underlying sexual reproduction in sugarcane. Optimal reference genes are essential for elucidating the expression pattern of a given gene by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).Entities:
Keywords: Female gametophyte; Novel genes; Sugarcane; Transcriptome analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34721982 PMCID: PMC8532975 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
The primers and amplification information of candidate reference genes.
| Gene ID/name | Genbank No. | Mean | SD | CV | Primers(F/R) | Length | E (%) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sspon.03G0028120/FAB2 |
| 27.71 | 1.72 | 0.06 | ACCCTTGCTTCAAGGATCAG | 103 | 1.01 | 0.998 |
| GTTGGACTTCCCTGCCATATAC | ||||||||
| Sspon.01G0006710/LOG2 |
| 23.17 | 4.91 | 0.21 | GGAACTAGGTATGAACTGCAAGA | 108 | 0.99 | 0.999 |
| CGGCTCTGAGAGGCAAATAA | ||||||||
| Sspon.08G0004380/VHA |
| 22.25 | 4.52 | 0.20 | AATTGTCGGTGCTGTCTCTC | 106 | 1.02 | 0.998 |
| AGCCAGCTTCTTATCCAATCC | ||||||||
| Sspon.01G0037150/MCB1 |
| 21.73 | 4.16 | 0.19 | CTTGCTCTGCGGTTGTCTAT | 111 | 0.99 | 0.995 |
| GTTTGAGCTTGAGGCATTGTT | ||||||||
| Sspon.06G0026890/ATPase |
| 21.16 | 4.83 | 0.23 | CGATGCGCAAGATGAAGAATG | 111 | 0.97 | 0.996 |
| CGTCCAGATCAAACGGTCTATT | ||||||||
| Sspon.08G0021360/ARM |
| 22.44 | 5.97 | 0.27 | ACAGGGATCAGATGCACAAG | 89 | 1.01 | 0.999 |
| GAGGGAGTCACACCGAATAAAT | ||||||||
| Sspon.01G0020070/TIC110 |
| 23.79 | 3.62 | 0.15 | CAGTACCTGCTGGGCATAAG | 105 | 1.00 | 0.999 |
| AAAGGCCAACTCCTCTTTCTC | ||||||||
| Sspon.03G0026510/VLN3 |
| 26.09 | 1.89 | 0.07 | GTCGACAGGGTTGTCATAACT | 111 | 1.04 | 0.998 |
| CCCATCTACTGCAGCATCTT | ||||||||
| Sspon.03G0047080/GET4 |
| 24.52 | 7.18 | 0.29 | CGCTTCTATGCTGGTGAACT | 98 | 0.99 | 0.995 |
| GGTTCCCTTGAGATAGGTACATT | ||||||||
| Sspon.03G0004010/MOR1 |
| 25.75 | 3.11 | 0.12 | CTAGCTCAGGTGGAGAAGAATG | 101 | 0.99 | 0.998 |
| GCAAACTTTGGAGAGGGTATTG | ||||||||
| Sspon.07G0009240/EF1α |
| 24.70 | 6.09 | 0.25 | CCTCCAGGATGTGTACAAGATT | 97 | 0.98 | 0.999 |
| ACCGAAGGTGACAACCATAC | ||||||||
| Sspon.03G0016270/TUB6 |
| 21.23 | 4.59 | 0.22 | TGCATTGGTACACTGGTGAG | 92 | 1.04 | 0.998 |
| GTACTGCTGGTACTCGGAAAC | ||||||||
| Sspon.08G0001560/GAPDH |
| 19.76 | 5.71 | 0.29 | CCGTGGATGTGTCAGTTGT | 94 | 1.00 | 0.996 |
| CCCTCAGATGCAGCCTTAATAG | ||||||||
| Sspon.08G0008230/UBC28 |
| 20.74 | 5.40 | 0.26 | GGCCCTGTTGCTGAAGATATG | 110 | 1.00 | 0.998 |
| TAGTCCGGTGGGAAGTGAATAG | ||||||||
| Sspon.01G0003870/PP2A |
| 19.59 | 6.22 | 0.32 | CAGGACATATCGGAGCAGTTT | 89 | 1.01 | 0.996 |
| GCCCAGTTATATCCCTCCATAAC | ||||||||
| Sspon.01G0058300/Expressed |
| 23.37 | 7.09 | 0.30 | CAGTTGTCGAGGGCACTAAA | 96 | 1.02 | 0.998 |
| GCTCAGCATCATTCAGTAAATCC | ||||||||
| Sspon.02G0047450/ACT7 |
| 19.13 | 10.30 | 0.54 | GAGCTATGAGTTGCCTGATGT | 99 | 0.99 | 0.996 |
| CCAGGAGCTTCCATCCTAATC | ||||||||
| Sspon.01G0006610/ACT |
| 19.09 | 9.58 | 0.50 | CCAGCAGGAGTTCTACATCAG | 100 | 1.01 | 0.996 |
| CCTCTCGATGGCTGCTTG |
Notes:
The name, ID and sequence information of these genes is from the Saccharum Genome Database.
(http://sugarcane.zhangjisenlab.cn/sgd/html/index.html).
Figure 1Identification and evaluation of optimal reference genes based on RNA-seq data in sugarcane ovule at different developmental stages.
(A) Statistical analysis of CV and RPKM values of 18 potential candidate genes identified based on RPKM values from the RNA-seq data. The data point in scatter plot shows the variation of given gene’s expression across all tested stages, the horizontal line represents CV = 0.2. Each box represents RPKM values of given gene in box and whiskers plot. (B) Relative expression level of 18 candidate genes was given by dividing RPKM values by average expression values across all sugarcane ovule developmental stages.
Figure 2Ct values of all 18 candidate genes in sugarcane ovule developmental samples.
The raw data of Ct values of 18 genes derived from all stages of sugarcane ovule developmental stages were collected and described using the box and whiskers plot. The box is determined from 25th to 75th percentiles, and the line across the box represents the median. The whiskers represent percentiles from 10th to 90th.
Gene expression stability ranked by geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper and Comprehensive ranking.
| Rank | geNorm | NormFinder | BestKeeper | Comprehensive ranking | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Stability | Gene | Stability | Gene | CV(%) ± SD | Gene | Geomean value | |
| 1 |
| 0.15 |
| 0.09 |
| 5.48 ± 1.52 |
| 2.00 |
| 2 |
| 0.15 |
| 0.10 |
| 6.28 ± 1.63 |
| 2.00 |
| 3 |
| 0.35 |
| 0.10 |
| 11.29 ± 2.68 |
| 2.71 |
| 4 |
| 0.50 |
| 0.26 |
| 11.37 ± 2.92 |
| 3.00 |
| 5 |
| 0.60 |
| 0.41 |
| 17.72 ± 3.85 |
| 3.27 |
| 6 |
| 0.88 |
| 0.80 |
| 18.71 ± 4.16 |
| 3.91 |
| 7 |
| 1.11 |
| 1.12 |
| 19.28 ± 4.46 |
| 6.32 |
| 8 |
| 1.39 |
| 1.50 |
| 20.32 ± 4.30 |
| 8.24 |
| 9 |
| 1.61 |
| 1.74 |
| 20.38 ± 4.32 |
| 8.32 |
| 10 |
| 1.95 |
| 2.22 |
| 21.69 ± 5.35 |
| 9.32 |
Figure 3Comprehensive evaluation and selection of 10 novel genes.
Pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) given by geNorm. Pairwise variation values were calculated to determine the optimal number of reference genes.
Figure 4Relative quantification of target genes in sugarcane ovule samples using two most stable genes and two least genes.
The relative expression levels of CDK (A) and REC8 (B) normalized by the most/least stable reference genes across different sugarcane ovule development stage by qRT-PCR and RPKM values. Bars indicate the standard error (±SE) determined from three biological replicates. Three asterisks (***) indicates significant differences (p < 0.01), and one asterisk (*) represents differences (p < 0.05).