| Literature DB >> 34719946 |
Marko Rudar1,2, Jane K Naberhuis1, Agus Suryawan1, Hanh V Nguyen1, Barbara Stoll1, Candace C Style3, Mariatu A Verla4, Oluyinka O Olutoye3, Douglas G Burrin1, Marta L Fiorotto1, Teresa A Davis1.
Abstract
Optimizing enteral nutrition for premature infants may help mitigate extrauterine growth restriction and adverse chronic health outcomes. Previously, we showed in neonatal pigs born at term that lean growth is enhanced by intermittent bolus compared with continuous feeding. The objective was to determine if prematurity impacts how body composition, muscle protein synthesis, and myonuclear accretion respond to feeding modality. Following preterm delivery, pigs were fed equivalent amounts of formula delivered either as intermittent boluses (INT; n = 30) or continuously (CONT; n = 14) for 21 days. Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and muscle growth was assessed by morphometry, myonuclear accretion, and satellite cell abundance. Tissue anabolic signaling and fractional protein synthesis rates were determined in INT pigs in postabsorptive (INT-PA) and postprandial (INT-PP) states and in CONT pigs. Body weight gain and composition did not differ between INT and CONT pigs. Longissimus dorsi (LD) protein synthesis was 34% greater in INT-PP than INT-PA pigs (P < 0.05) but was not different between INT-PP and CONT pigs. Phosphorylation of 4EBP1 and S6K1 and eIF4E·eIF4G abundance in LD paralleled changes in LD protein synthesis. Satellite cell abundance, myonuclear accretion, and fiber cross-sectional area in LD did not differ between groups. These results suggest that, unlike pigs born at term, intermittent bolus feeding does not enhance lean growth more than continuous feeding in pigs born preterm. Premature birth attenuates the capacity of skeletal muscle to respond to cyclical surges in insulin and amino acids with intermittent feeding in early postnatal life.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Extrauterine growth restriction often occurs in premature infants but may be mitigated by optimizing enteral feeding strategies. We show that intermittent bolus feeding does not increase skeletal muscle protein synthesis, myonuclear accretion, or lean growth more than continuous feeding in preterm pigs. This attenuated anabolic response of muscle to intermittent bolus feeding, compared with previous observations in pigs born at term, may contribute to deficits in lean mass that many premature infants exhibit into adulthood.Entities:
Keywords: feeding modality; myonuclear accretion; prematurity; protein synthesis; skeletal muscle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34719946 PMCID: PMC8714968 DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00236.2021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0193-1849 Impact factor: 4.310
Macronutrient composition of total parenteral nutrition.a,b
| Ingredient | Content, g·L−1 |
|---|---|
| Carbohydrate | 91.7 |
| Lipid | 20.8 |
| Amino acids | 66.7 |
aElectrolyte composition (g·L−1): calcium, 0.54; chloride, 1.28; potassium, 1.02; phosphate, 0.47; magnesium, 0.10; sodium, 0.67.
bVitamin and trace minerals (mg·L−1): vitamin A, 1.375; vitamin D, 0.0104; vitamin E, 0.0123; vitamin K, 0.21; thiamine, 20.83; riboflavin, 1.04; niacin, 20.83; pantothenic acid, 4.17; pyridoxine, 2.09; biotin, 0.042; folic acid, 0.42; cyanocobalamin, 0.021; ascorbic acid, 208.3; iron, 26.25; zinc, 26.25; copper, 1.67; manganese, 1.04; selenium, 0.083; chromium, 0.042; iodine, 0.042.
cCarbohydrate supplied as dextrose.
dLipid supplied as intralipid 20%; contains 20% soybean oil, 1.2% egg yolk phospholipids, 2.25% glycerin, and water for injection.
eAmino acids (g·L−1): alanine, 3.34; arginine, 2.84; aspartic acid, 5.14; cysteine·HCl, 1.49; glutamic acid, 6.43; glutamine, 5.14; glycine, 2.51; histidine, 1.67; isoleucine, 3.73; leucine, 6.62; lysine·HCl, 6.24; methionine, 1.67; phenylalanine, 3.41; proline, 4.82; serine, 3.60; threonine, 4.05; tryptophan, 0.77; tyrosine, 0.77; valine, 4.05.
Ingredient and macronutrient composition of milk replacer formula
| Ingredient, g·kg−1 | |
|---|---|
| Whey protein concentrate | 109 |
| Lactose | 19.6 |
| Corn oil | 39.6 |
| MCT oil | 25.8 |
| Fat Pak 80 | 13.8 |
| Xanthan gum | 0.6 |
| Vitamin premixd | 2.5 |
| Mineral premixd | 11.3 |
| Water | 778 |
| Calculated nutrient content | |
| Total protein, g·kg−1 | 87.7 |
| Total carbohydrate, g·kg−1 | 27.8 |
| Total fat, g·kg−1 | 83.4 |
| Energy, kcal·kg−1 | 1,173 |
aWhey protein concentrate supplied from NutraBio, Middlesex, NJ.
bMedium chain triglyceride oil.
cFat Pak 80 supplied from Milk Specialties Global, Eden Prairie, MN.
dVitamin and mineral premixes supplied from Dyets, Bethlehem, PA.
Calculated volume and nutrient intake from parenteral and enteral nutrition during the first 6 days after birth in pigs
| Volume,mL·kg−1·day−1 | Protein,g·kg−1·day−1 | Carbohydrate,g·kg−1·day−1 | Fat,g·kg−1·day−1 | Energy,kcal·kg−1·day−1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| P | 144 | 9.6 | 13.2 | 3.0 | 114 |
| E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sum | 144 | 9.6 | 13.2 | 3.0 | 114 |
|
| |||||
| P | 120 | 8.0 | 11.0 | 2.5 | 95 |
| E | 54 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 63 |
| Sum | 174 | 12.8 | 12.5 | 7.0 | 158 |
|
| |||||
| P | 144 | 9.6 | 13.2 | 3.0 | 114 |
| E | 72 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 84 |
| Sum | 216 | 16.0 | 15.2 | 9.0 | 198 |
|
| |||||
| P | 96 | 6.4 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 76 |
| E | 108 | 9.6 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 126 |
| Sum | 204 | 16.0 | 11.8 | 11.0 | 202 |
|
| |||||
| P | 60 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 48 |
| E | 135 | 12.0 | 3.8 | 11.3 | 158 |
| Sum | 195 | 16.0 | 9.3 | 12.6 | 206 |
| P | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| E | 180 | 16.0 | 5.0 | 15.0 | 210 |
| Sum | 180 | 16.0 | 5.0 | 15.0 | 210 |
aP, parenteral volume and macronutrient intake.
bE, enteral volume and macronutrient intake.
cSum of parenteral and enteral volume and macronutrient intake.
dVolume and macronutrient intakes on day 6 were maintained until the end of the study on day 22.
Antibody information for antibodies used in immunoprecipitation and immunoblot experiments
| Antibody | Source | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| eIF4E (for immunoprecipitation) | Gift of Dr. Leanord Jefferson, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA | N/A |
| eIF4G | Millipore Sigma | Cat. No. 07-1800; RRID:AB_355697 |
| eIF4E | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 9742; RRID:AB_823488 |
| Raptor (for immunoprecipitation) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 2280; RRID:AB_561245 |
| Rheb | R&D Systems | Cat. No. MAB3246; RRID:AB_2178785 |
| RagA | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 4357; RRID:AB_10545136 |
| RagC | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 5466; RRID:AB_10692651 |
| mTOR | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 2972; RRID:AB_330978 |
| Mios (for immunoprecipitation) | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 13557; RRID:AB_2798254 |
| Sestrin2 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 8487; RRID:AB_11178663 |
| Mios | Proteintech Group | Cat. No. 20826-1-AP; RRID:AB_2878747 |
| p-4EBP1 Thr70 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 9455; RRID:AB_330949 |
| 4EBP1 | Bethyl Laboratories | Cat. No. A300-501A; RRID:AB_2277825 |
| p-S6K1 Thr389 | R&D Systems | Cat. No. AF8963; RRID:AB_355697 |
| S6K1 | Proteintech Group | Cat. No. 14485-1-AP; RRID:AB_2269787 |
| p-Akt Thr308 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 9275; RRID:AB_329828 |
| Akt | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 9272; RRID:AB_329827 |
| p-eIF2α Ser51 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 9721; RRID:AB_330951 |
| eIF2α | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 9722; RRID:AB_2230924 |
| p-eEF2 Thr56 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 2331; RRID:AB_10015204 |
| eEF2 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 2332; RRID:AB_10693546 |
| MuRF1 | ECM Biosciences | Cat. No. AP2041; RRID:AB_2208833 |
| Atrogin-1 | R&D Systems | Cat. No. AF5366; RRID:AB_2246979 |
| LC3A/B | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat. No. 4108; RRID:AB_213770 |
| GAPDH | Proteintech Group | Cat. No. 60004-1-Ig; RRID:AB_2107436 |
|
| ||
| Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L)-HRP conjugate | Bio-Rad | Cat. No. 170-6515; RRID:AB_11125142 |
| Goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L)-HRP conjugate | Bio-Rad | Cat. No. 170-6516; RRID:AB_11125547 |
eEF2, eukaryotic elongation factor 2; eIF2α, eukaryotic initiation factor 2α; eIF4E, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E; eIF4G, eukaryotic initiation factor 4 G; LC3A/B, microtubule associated protein light chain; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; MuRF1, muscle RING-finger protein 1; p, phospho; rag, ras-related GTP-binding protein; rheb, ras homolog enriched in brain; Sestrin2, stress response protein 2; S6K1, ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1; 4EBP1, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1.
Antibody information for antibodies used in immunohistochemistry experiments
| Antibody | Source | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
| Subsarcolemmal BrdU+ myonuclei | ||
| Dystrophin (H-300) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | Cat. No. sc-15376; RRID:AB_2091230 |
| BrdU (clone G3G4) | DSHB | Cat. No. G3G4; RRID:AB_2618097 |
| Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat. No. A-11008; RRID:AB_143165 |
| Goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L), biotinylated | Vector Laboratories | Cat. No. BA-9200; RRID:AB_2336171 |
| Sublaminal Pax7+ nuclei | ||
| Laminin | Millipore Sigma | Cat. No. L9393; RRID:AB_477163 |
| Pax7 | DSHB | Cat. No. PAX7; RRID:AB_2299243 |
| Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat. No. A-11034; RRID:AB_2576217 |
| Biotin-SP goat anti-mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 1 specific | Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories | RRID:AB_2338571 |
Figure 1.Initial and final body weights (A), lean mass (B), and fat mass (C) of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT; n = 30 for body weight, 7 male and 23 female; n = 28 for body composition, 7 male and 21 female) or continuous (CONT; n = 14, 5 male and 9 female) feeding for 21 days. Two pigs from the INT group were excluded from body composition analysis due to inadequate sedation for the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. Data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVA. Values are least squares means ± SE; individual data are shown.
Figure 2.Plasma insulin (A), glucose (B), BCAA (C), leucine (D), isoleucine (E), and valine (F) concentrations over 4 h of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT; n = 27, 7 male and 20 female) or continuous (CONT; n = 12, 4 male and 8 female) feeding for 21 days. Three pigs from the INT group and two pigs from the CONT group were excluded from analysis due to nonpatent catheters for blood collection. Data were analyzed by two-factor ANOVA. Values are least squares means ± SE. *P < 0.05 and ‡P < 0.10, INT vs. CONT within time point. BCAA, branched-chain amino acid.
Figure 3.Fractional protein synthesis rate of the longissimus dorsi (LD), gastrocnemius, and soleus muscles of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT) or continuous (CONT) feeding for 21 days. Muscle from pigs fed by intermittent bolus feeding was sampled in the postabsorptive state (INT-PA, before feeding) and in the postprandial state (INT-PP, 60 min after feeding). Data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s procedure. Three pigs from the INT-PA group and two pigs from the CONT group were excluded from analysis due to nonpatent catheters for tracer infusion and blood collection. Values are least squares means ± SE; individual data are shown; CONT, n = 12 (4 male and 8 female); INT-PA, n = 11 (2 male and 9 female); INT-PP, n = 16 (5 male and 11 female). Means without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05.
Tissue fractional protein synthesis rates (%/day) of preterm pigs fed by intermittent bolus or continuous feeding for 21 days
| Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue | INT-PA | INT-PP | CONT | |
| Heart | 13.7 ± 0.5b | 16.7 ± 0.4a | 15.7 ± 0.5a | <0.001 |
| Lung | 26.5 ± 1.0b | 30.5 ± 0.8a | 27.6 ± 0.9b | 0.006 |
| Brain | 12.4 ± 0.8 | 13.3 ± 0.6 | 12.0 ± 0.7 | 0.41 |
| Liver | 58.4 ± 1.7 | 62.1 ± 1.4 | 60.4 ± 1.7 | 0.27 |
| Jejunum | 59.5 ± 3.5 | 67.8 ± 2.9 | 63.3 ± 3.3 | 0.19 |
| Pancreas | 82.4 ± 6.1 | 88.8 ± 4.8 | 91.8 ± 5.5 | 0.51 |
Values are least squares means ± SE calculated from one-factor ANOVA and differences among treatments were determined with a Tukey’s post hoc test; CONT, n = 12 (4 male and 8 female); INT-PA, n = 11 (2 male and 9 female); INT-PP, n = 16 (5 male and 11 female). Three pigs from the INT-PA group and two pigs from the CONT group were excluded from analysis due to nonpatent catheters for tracer infusion and blood collection. Labeled means in a row without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05. CONT, continuous feeding; INT-PA, intermittent bolus feeding in postabsorptive state (before feeding); INT-PP, intermittent bolus feeding in postprandial state (60 min after feeding).
Figure 4.Relative abundance of phosphorylated Akt (A), phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1; B), phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1; C), and the active eIF4E·eIF4G complex (D) in the longissimus dorsi (LD), gastrocnemius, and soleus muscles of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT) or continuous (CONT) feeding for 21 days. Phosphoprotein abundance was normalized to the corresponding total protein abundance; eIF4E·eIF4G abundance was normalized to total eIF4E abundance. Representative immunoblots are shown for each treatment group. Muscle from pigs fed by intermittent bolus feeding was sampled in the postabsorptive state (INT-PA, before feeding) and in the postprandial state (INT-PP, 60 min after feeding). Data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s procedure. Values are least squares means ± SE; individual data are shown; CONT, n = 14 (5 male and 9 female); INT-PA, n = 13 (2 male and 11 female); INT-PP, n = 16 (5 male and 11 female). Means without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05. AU, arbitrary units.
Figure 5.Relative abundance of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) with Ras homolog enriched in brain complex (Rheb; A), Sestrin2·GATOR2 complex (B), mTOR·RagA complex (C), mTOR·RagC complex (D), phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α; E), and phosphorylated eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2; F) in the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT) or continuous (CONT) feeding for 21 days. Phosphoprotein abundance was normalized to the corresponding total protein abundance; mTOR·Rheb, mTOR·RagA, and mTOR·RagC abundances were normalized to total mTOR abundance; Sestrin2·GATOR2 abundance was normalized to total Mios (GATOR2) abundance. Representative immunoblots are shown for each treatment group. LD muscle from pigs fed by intermittent bolus feeding was sampled in the postabsorptive state (INT-PA, before feeding) and in the postprandial state (INT-PP, 60 min after feeding). Data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s procedure. Values are least squares means ± SE; individual data are shown; CONT, n = 14 (5 male and 9 female); INT-PA, n = 13 (2 male and 11 female); INT-PP, n = 16 (5 male and 11 female). One measurement for Sestrin2·GATOR2 (CONT group) and mTOR·RagA (INT-PP group) was excluded from analysis due to technical error. Means without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05. AU, arbitrary units.
Figure 6.Ratio of microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3)-II to total LC3 (A), and relative abundance of atrogin-1 (B) and muscle RING-finger protein 1 (MuRF1; C) in the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT) or continuous (CONT) feeding for 21 days. Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 abundances were normalized to GAPDH abundance. Representative immunoblots are shown for each treatment group. LD muscle from pigs fed by intermittent bolus feeding was sampled in the postabsorptive state (INT-PA, before feeding) and in the postprandial state (INT-PP, 60 min after feeding). Data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s procedure. Values are least squares means ± SE; individual data are shown; CONT, n = 14 (5 male and 9 female); INT-PA, n = 13 (2 male and 11 female); INT-PP, n = 16 (5 male and 11 female). Means without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05. AU, arbitrary units.
Relative abundance of phosphorylated signaling proteins in organs of preterm pigs fed by intermittent bolus or continuous feeding for 21 days
| Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue | INT-PA | INT-PP | CONT | |
| Heart | ||||
| p-Akt | 0.34 ± 0.06b | 0.70 ± 0.05a | 0.67 ± 0.06a | <0.001 |
| p-4EBP1 | 0.26 ± 0.06b | 0.57 ± 0.05a | 0.52 ± 0.06a | <0.001 |
| p-S6K1 | 0.29 ± 0.06b | 0.56 ± 0.06a | 0.55 ± 0.06a | 0.005 |
| Lung | ||||
| p-Akt | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | 0.19 |
| p-4EBP1 | 0.43 ± 0.05b | 0.60 ± 0.05a | 0.57 ± 0.05a | 0.049 |
| p-S6K1 | 0.45 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.07 | 0.36 |
| Brain | ||||
| p-Akt | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.87 |
| p-4EBP1 | 0.59 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.73 |
| p-S6K1 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.84 |
| Liver | ||||
| p-Akt | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 0.88 |
| p-4EBP1 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.63 |
| p-S6K1 | 0.54 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.07 | 0.93 |
| Jejunum | ||||
| p-Akt | 0.65 ± 0.07 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.89 |
| p-4EBP1 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.85 |
| p-S6K1 | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.83 |
| Pancreas | ||||
| p-Akt | 0.50 ± 0.07 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | 0.83 |
| p-4EBP1 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.63 |
| p-S6K1 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.82 |
Values are least squares means ± SE calculated from one-factor ANOVA and differences among treatments were determined with a Tukey’s post hoc test; CONT, n = 14 (5 male and 9 female); INT-PA, n = 13 (2 male and 11 female); INT-PP, n = 16 (5 male and 11 female). Labeled means in a row without a common superscript letter differ, P < 0.05. Phosphoprotein abundance was normalized to the corresponding total protein abundance. CONT, continuous feeding; INT-PA, intermittent bolus feeding in postabsorptive state (before feeding); INT-PP, intermittent bolus feeding in postprandial state (60 min after feeding); p, phospho; S6K1, ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1; 4EBP1, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1.
Figure 7.Representative longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle cross-sections stained for sublaminal Pax7+ nuclei (A); muscle cross-sections were stained for laminin (blue), nuclei (red; DAPI), and Pax7 (green). White arrows indicate sublaminal Pax7+ nuclei in the merged image; scale bar = 50 µm. Representative LD muscle cross-sections stained for subsarcolemmal 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU)+ myonuclei (B); muscle cross-sections were stained for dystrophin (blue), nuclei (red; DAPI), and BrdU (green). White arrows indicate subsarcolemmal BrdU+ myonuclei in the merged image; scale bar = 50 µm. Sublaminal Pax7+ nuclei (satellite cells) per 1,000 fibers (C), subsarcolemmal BrdU+ myonuclei per 1,000 fibers (D), and total subsarcolemmal myonuclei per 1,000 fibers (E) in the LD muscle of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT; n = 8, 3 male and 5 female) or continuous (CONT; n = 6, 2 male and 4 female) feeding for 21 days. Nuclei were quantified from an average of 1,600 fiber cross-sections per pig. Data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVA. Values are least squares means ± SE; individual data are shown.
Figure 8.Distribution of longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle fiber cross-sectional areas (CSA) (A) and distribution of LD muscle fiber minimum Feret diameters (B) of preterm pigs provided intermittent bolus (INT; n = 8, 3 male and 5 female) or continuous (CONT; n = 6, 2 male and 4 female) feeding for 21 days. Each data point represents the frequency of fibers within each 100-µm2 bin (CSA) or each 2.5-µm bin (minimum Feret diameter). Fiber CSA and minimum Feret diameters were quantified from an average of 800 fiber cross-sections per pig. Data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVA. Values are least squares means ± SE.