Jen-Hau Chen1, Hua-San Shih2, Jennifer Tu3, Jeng-Min Chiou4, Shu-Hui Chang2, Wei-Li Hsu5,6, Liang-Chuan Lai7, Ta-Fu Chen8, Yen-Ching Chen2,9. 1. Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Nankang District, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Physical Therapy Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. Graduate Institute of Physiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 8. Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 9. Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive frailty integrating impaired cognitive domains and frailty dimensions has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore 1) associations among frailty dimensions and cognitive domains over time and 2) the extended definitions of cognitive frailty for predicting all-cause mortality. METHODS: This four-year cohort study recruited 521 older adults at baseline (2011-2013). We utilized 1) generalized linear mixed models exploring associations of frailty dimensions (physical dimension: modified from Fried et al.; psychosocial dimension: integrating self-rated health, mood, and social relationship and support; global frailty: combining physical and psychosocial frailty) with cognition (global and domain-specific) over time and 2) time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models assessing associations between extended definitions of cognitive frailty (cognitive domains-frailty dimensions) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: At baseline, the prevalence was 3.0% for physical frailty and 37.6% for psychosocial frailty. Greater physical frailty was associated with poor global cognition (adjusted odds ratio = 1.43-3.29, β: -1.07), logical memory (β: -0.14 to -0.10), and executive function (β: -0.51 to -0.12). Greater psychosocial frailty was associated with poor global cognition (β: -0.44) and attention (β: -0.15 to -0.13). Three newly proposed definitions of cognitive frailty, "mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-psychosocial frailty," "MCI-global frailty," and "impaired verbal fluency-global frailty," outperformed traditional cognitive frailty for predicting all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.49, 6.83, 3.29 versus 4.87; AIC = 224.3, 221.8, 226.1 versus 228.1). CONCLUSION: Notably, extended definitions of cognitive frailty proposed by this study better predict all-cause mortality in older adults than the traditional definition of cognitive frailty, highlighting the importance of psychosocial frailty to reduce mortality in older adults.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive frailty integrating impaired cognitive domains and frailty dimensions has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore 1) associations among frailty dimensions and cognitive domains over time and 2) the extended definitions of cognitive frailty for predicting all-cause mortality. METHODS: This four-year cohort study recruited 521 older adults at baseline (2011-2013). We utilized 1) generalized linear mixed models exploring associations of frailty dimensions (physical dimension: modified from Fried et al.; psychosocial dimension: integrating self-rated health, mood, and social relationship and support; global frailty: combining physical and psychosocial frailty) with cognition (global and domain-specific) over time and 2) time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models assessing associations between extended definitions of cognitive frailty (cognitive domains-frailty dimensions) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: At baseline, the prevalence was 3.0% for physical frailty and 37.6% for psychosocial frailty. Greater physical frailty was associated with poor global cognition (adjusted odds ratio = 1.43-3.29, β: -1.07), logical memory (β: -0.14 to -0.10), and executive function (β: -0.51 to -0.12). Greater psychosocial frailty was associated with poor global cognition (β: -0.44) and attention (β: -0.15 to -0.13). Three newly proposed definitions of cognitive frailty, "mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-psychosocial frailty," "MCI-global frailty," and "impaired verbal fluency-global frailty," outperformed traditional cognitive frailty for predicting all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.49, 6.83, 3.29 versus 4.87; AIC = 224.3, 221.8, 226.1 versus 228.1). CONCLUSION: Notably, extended definitions of cognitive frailty proposed by this study better predict all-cause mortality in older adults than the traditional definition of cognitive frailty, highlighting the importance of psychosocial frailty to reduce mortality in older adults.