Fahd N Yunus1, Alexander C Perino2,3,4, DaJuanicia N Holmes5, Roland A Matsouaka5, Anne B Curtis6, Kenneth A Ellenbogen7, David S Frankel8, Bradley P Knight9, Andrea M Russo10, William R Lewis11, Jonathan P Piccini5, Mintu P Turakhia2,3,4. 1. Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health Care System, New York, NY (F.N.Y.). 2. Department of Medicine (A.C.P., M.P.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 3. Center for Digital Health (A.C.P., M.P.T.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 4. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (A.C.P., M.P.T.). 5. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (D.N.H., R.A.M., J.P.P.). 6. Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY (A.B.C.). 7. Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (K.A.E.). 8. Cardiovascular Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (D.S.F.). 9. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL (B.P.K.). 10. Cooper Medical School of Rowan Univ, Camden, NJ (A.M.R.). 11. MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (W.R.L.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When presenting for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, women, compared with men, tend to have more nonpulmonary vein triggers and advanced atrial disease. Whether this informs differences in AF ablation strategy is not well described. We aimed to characterize ablation strategy and complications by sex, using the Get With The Guidelines-AF registry. METHODS: From the Get With The Guidelines-AF registry ablation feature, we included patients who underwent initial AF ablation procedure between January 7, 2016, and December 27, 2019. Patients were stratified based on AF type (paroxysmal versus nonparoxysmal) and sex. We compared patient demographics, ablation strategy, and complications by sex. RESULTS: Among 5356 patients from 31 sites who underwent AF ablation, 1969 were women (36.8%). Women, compared with men, were older (66.8±9.6 versus 63.4±10.6, P<0.0001) and were more likely to have paroxysmal AF (59.4% versus 49.5%, P<0.0001). In women with nonparoxysmal AF, left atrial linear ablation was more frequent (roof line: 53.9% versus 45.3%, P=0.0002; inferior mitral isthmus line: 10.2% versus 7.0%, P=0.01; floor line: 46.1% versus 40.6%, P=0.02) than in men. In multivariable analysis, the association between patient sex and complications from ablation was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this US wide AF ablation quality improvement registry, women with nonparoxysmal AF were more likely to receive adjunctive lesion sets compared with men. These findings suggest that patient sex may inform ablation strategy in ways that may not be strongly supported by evidence and emphasize the need to clarify optimal ablation strategies by sex.
BACKGROUND: When presenting for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, women, compared with men, tend to have more nonpulmonary vein triggers and advanced atrial disease. Whether this informs differences in AF ablation strategy is not well described. We aimed to characterize ablation strategy and complications by sex, using the Get With The Guidelines-AF registry. METHODS: From the Get With The Guidelines-AF registry ablation feature, we included patients who underwent initial AF ablation procedure between January 7, 2016, and December 27, 2019. Patients were stratified based on AF type (paroxysmal versus nonparoxysmal) and sex. We compared patient demographics, ablation strategy, and complications by sex. RESULTS: Among 5356 patients from 31 sites who underwent AF ablation, 1969 were women (36.8%). Women, compared with men, were older (66.8±9.6 versus 63.4±10.6, P<0.0001) and were more likely to have paroxysmal AF (59.4% versus 49.5%, P<0.0001). In women with nonparoxysmal AF, left atrial linear ablation was more frequent (roof line: 53.9% versus 45.3%, P=0.0002; inferior mitral isthmus line: 10.2% versus 7.0%, P=0.01; floor line: 46.1% versus 40.6%, P=0.02) than in men. In multivariable analysis, the association between patient sex and complications from ablation was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this US wide AF ablation quality improvement registry, women with nonparoxysmal AF were more likely to receive adjunctive lesion sets compared with men. These findings suggest that patient sex may inform ablation strategy in ways that may not be strongly supported by evidence and emphasize the need to clarify optimal ablation strategies by sex.
Entities:
Keywords:
atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; quality improvement; women’s health
Authors: Sofia E Gomez; Muhammad Fazal; Julio C Nunes; Shayena Shah; Alexander C Perino; Sanjiv M Narayan; Kamala P Tamirisa; Janet K Han; Fatima Rodriguez; Tina Baykaner Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Andrea Demarchi; Giulio Conte; Shih-Ann Chen; Li-Wei Lo; Wei-Tso Chen; Tom De Potter; Peter Geelen; Andrea Sarkozy; Francesco R Spera; Tobias Reichlin; Laurent Roten; Pascal Defaye; Adrien Carabelli; Serge Boveda; Hamed Bourenane; Lisa Riesinger; Simon Kochhäuser; Gala Caixal; Lluis Mont; Daniel Scherr; Martin Manninger; Francesco Pentimalli; Stefano Cornara; Catherine Klersy; Angelo Auricchio Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 4.241